Quantcast
Channel: Business Insider
Viewing all 76301 articles
Browse latest View live

Simone Biles criticized the new head of USA Gymnastics for an anti-Nike tweet

$
0
0

simone biles

  • Simone Biles criticized Mary Bono, the new president of USA Gymnastics, for an anti-Nike tweet.
  • Bono appeared to be joining the right-wing campaign against Colin Kaepernick, the face of a Nike advertising campaign, because he protested police brutality against African-Americans by kneeling during the National Anthem at football games.
  • Bono deleted her tweet and said she regretted it.
  • The USA Gymnastics organization is currently embroiled in several scandals stemming from how it handled former sports doctor Larry Nassar's sexual abusing hundreds of women.

Olympic gymnast Simone Biles criticized Mary Bono, the new head of USA Gymnastics, over a now-deleted anti-Nike tweet.

Bono tweeted a photo of herself filling in the Nike logo on a pair of shoes with a marker while attending an event intended to raise money for the military. She appeared to be joining the right-wing campaign against Nike for featuring Colin Kaepernick, the football player who led national protests of police brutality against African-Americans, in an advertising campaign.

In his protests, Kaepernick sat or kneeled during the national anthem played before football games. Conservative politicians and media figures have sought to distort Kaepernick's protests as one against the military and veterans. Kaepernick is currently a free agent and alleges the NFL blackballed him for his political views, in a case currently making its way through the courts.

Biles, the most celebrated gymnast in the world since breaking a series of records at the 2016 Rio Olympics, called out Bono's tweet as inappropriate.

Nike also sponsors Biles.

Bono has since deleted her tweet, but it's been captured by screenshots.

mary bono tweet nike gymnastics president

In a series of follow-up tweets, Bono said she regretted publicizing her views.

Bono was appointed president and CEO of USA Gymnastics on Friday. She is a former longtime Republican congresswoman, serving between 1998 and 2013. (She was first appointed after the death of her husband, Congressman Sonny Bono, who was previously part of the music duo Sonny & Cher.)

Her appointment comes in the wake of a series of scandals plaguing the USA Gymnastics organization. They stem from years of sexual abuse of gymnasts at Michigan State University by Larry Nassar, the university's former sports medicine doctor. More than 265 women accused Nassar of sexual misconduct, including Biles.

Following the scandal, USA Gymnastics replaced its entire board of directors and forced the resignation of its previous president, Steve Penny.

Visit INSIDER's homepage for more.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Inside the Trump 'MAGA' hat factory


I trekked to the legendary Great Wall of China to see the 13,000-mile treasure for myself, and it's even more incredible than I expected

$
0
0

Great Wall Of China Photos Tour (1 of 1)

  • The Great Wall of China became one of the 7 New Wonders of the World when it was chosen in 2007 by a vote of 100 million people.
  • The Great Wall may be one of the most iconic man-made structures in the world and is a must-see for most travelers.
  • There are many places to see the 13,000+ mile long wall. I decided to visit a section called Mutianyu about 2 hours outside of Beijing.
  • Located in a picturesque verdant valley, the Wall was beautiful and, on a spring day in May,  there was perfect weather and few crowds. I can't wait to visit wilder sections of the Wall on later trips.

While only one of the ancient seven wonders of the world still stands — the Pyramids of Giza — 100 million people voted in 2007 to select a New Seven Wonders of the World.

Among the winners: the ancient city of Petra in Jordan, the Christ the Redeemer Statue in Brazil, Machu Picchu in Peru, Chichen Itza in Mexico, the Colosseum in Rome, and the Taj Mahal in India.

And, last but not least: the Great Wall of China,

Though the Great Wall was not listed as World Heritage site by UNESCO until 1987, it is possibly the most iconic man-made structure in the world. I don't think it's an exaggeration to say it is a must-see for just about every traveler with even a passing interest in seeing China. 

Visiting the Wall can be easy or hard depending on what exactly you want to see. Stretching over 13,000 miles through mountains, grasslands, and deserts, there are lots of places to see The Great Wall. It all depends on how much time you have and what you want to see. 

When I visited China in April, I was on a tight schedule that had me running from Shanghai to Beijing to Shenzhen for a slew of meetings with tech companies. It left me little time to traverse the wilder sections of the Great Wall. But there was no way I was going to miss a chance to see the wonder.

I decided to visit the Mutianyu section of the Wall, just a couple hours outside of Beijing. Located in a picturesque green valley, the well-maintained section is one of the most popular places to walk the Wall.

It was the perfect trip to see 3,000-years worth of history in a single day.

Here's what the experience was like:

SEE ALSO: One of the 7 wonders of the world is a 10,000-year-old city hidden in the desert — and in real life, it's more incredible than you can imagine

DON'T MISS: I've been traveling the world for 6 months, and I've found real life doesn't always live up to the hype. These are the most disappointing places I've been.

While most people tend to think of The Great Wall as one giant thing, it's actually a series of sometimes connected, sometimes independent fortifications built along China's historical northern border.



There are any number of sections to visit, but the most popular tend to be those within a few hours of Beijing. The Badaling section, the closest to Beijing is easy to walk but very crowded, while the Simatai section is further away, quiet, unrestored, and requires a difficult hike. The Mutianyu section is somewhere in between those two.



After about a two-hour drive north from Beijing, I arrived at the Mutianyu section of the Great Wall. There's a big paifang, or Chinese gateway arch, to let you know you're in the right place.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

I've been a CEO for 7 years — here's the best advice I can give you about being successful in the role

$
0
0

Rich McBee Headshot for bio April17 (1)

  • Becoming a CEO means you were probably already good at whatever executive position you held previously within your company. 
  • But leading the company as CEO requires a few different skills that you might not yet know.
  • Rich McBee, CEO of Mitel since 2011, shares six things he learned about the role and what it takes to succeed in the top job.
  • First-time CEOs might not know that you'll constantly be judged, you serve many masters, and how to navigate people issues from the start.

As a kid, I had one answer when asked what I wanted to be when I grew up: a CEO of a public company.

Funny as that may sound, I had my sights on the corner office for as long as I can remember. I didn't know what the job would entail back then, but even in my earliest years I'd pore over the Wall Street Journal, absorbing as much business knowledge as possible.

I finally achieved my childhood dream in 2011, when I became CEO of Mitel.

Was I ready? I sure thought so — I had the operational side wired. But there are a lot of things you can't be trained for; some things you must experience for yourself.

Fast forward seven years, and I've learned  countless lessons I'm happy to share with first-time CEOs and those who aspire to the role. I won't share insights from a strategy or operations perspective here. You are probably already good at that, or you wouldn't be in your role.

Instead, I'll just offer some observations from the chair.

1. Develop a thick skin

Get ready for judgment. In the role of CEO, you're no longer the giver; you're now the receiver. Internal pressure and public criticism come with the job—both sometimes appropriate and sometimes unfounded. Either way, count on being second guessed consistently.

In my early days at Mitel, a blogger made a comment online criticizing me personally, something along the lines of: "McBee couldn't manage his way out of a wet paper bag." I won't lie, this stung for a minute — or maybe a bit longer. But you have to get over it. At the same time, we were getting a lot of accolades from industry and financial analysts for executing our strategy and delivering results. You know if you have the right strategy and whether you're delivering on it. It's all about having a thick skin and staying focused.

2. You are in a league of your own, yet you serve many masters

Making the move from senior executive to the CEO is a more significant transition than many realize.. For one, you're in a league of your own. As an executive, you're a member of a team and you drive a piece of the company strategy. As a CEO, that strategy —good or bad— is ultimately yours. You own it. You lead the team. Employees look to you for the direction they will execute against.

That said, don't be fooled into thinking the CEO is his or her own boss and operates with free reign. In fact, I have more bosses today than ever. As a member of the executive staff, you have one boss. As a CEO, the board of directors is your boss, so you may have five, seven, or more on the board to report to — and,there are also the shareholders.

When it comes to board members, they do work together, but they also  exert their independence. Each board member may want to review something different — or they may want to review the same thing, but in a different way. You may have to learn six or seven ways of reviewing the same material for someone with a different perspective or preference.

Developing a relationship with each member is critical, and so is speaking with each one before board meetings. You'll want to be aware of their concerns to head off issues, or at least be prepared when the topic comes up.

3. Nothing is more important than putting the right people in the right place, at the right time

There's a fine line between showing compassion and doing what's right for your team and the company. It can be easy to give people too much time to fix a situation, or to jump in and do their job for them. But you need to trust your gut and recognize when something isn't working out. Don't waste time—make the change and do it quickly. When I talk with other CEOs, the most consistent regret is not moving fast enough on the people issues.

If you are brought in to accelerate or lead through a time of significant transition, take a hard look at your management team. It's critical to determine quickly who will be effective, and who may not have the appropriate skill set and experience to take the company forward with you. Nothing is more important than putting the right people in the right place, at the right time—for them and the company.

4. You are the roadshow

As an executive leader at a public company, you may have participated in investor roadshows. As the CEO, you are the roadshow.

They want to hear from you and understand your strategy. Then, they're going to judge you on whether it makes sense and if they think you can execute it.

I've always said, a company's stock price is equal to its Fair Market Value + Greed – Fear. I'll give you an example of what I mean. Some time ago, I was waiting for my turn to present at an analyst event while a CEO in front of me was giving his pitch. At one point, he said something that caused a chilling effect. He said his company had the right strategy, but cautioned it was going to be very difficult to execute. That one word, "difficult," caused instant fear.

As I looked around the room, people were picking up their mobile phones, while he was still presenting, and giving instructions to sell.

Never forget: Everything you say, every tone in your voice and your body language ,is being observed. Make sure you're projecting what you mean—all the time, every time.

5. Your values can determine your value

In today's world of instant communication and social media, it's easy to broadcast every single thought without an understanding of who it is reaching. It can also blur lines between your opinion and what your company stands for. If your stakeholders—customers, employees, investors, etc.—get wind of your views and don't agree, they may factor these views into decisions they make about you and your company.

Your personal communications strategy should be considered a key aspect of the company's overall reputation management. This doesn't mean you shouldn't have a voice or an opinion on issues impacting your industry and your company. You just need to carefully consider what you're saying and how it could be perceived by the various stakeholders, especially at a time when people are constantly trying very hard to read between the lines.  

6. Have fun

Being a first-time CEO is exciting; you've worked hard, so enjoy it. You're opening the door to new possibilities and providing a fresh perspective to impact the future of your company.

However, you must be prepared to face the added internal and external pressures to succeed in the role. Never ever fail to admit when you're wrong. Admit it and move on. Face the dynamics of being a new CEO and approach the ever-evolving business landscape head-on. You can't know it all, but you can assemble a team that does. Look to retain or hire, in every position, a person who can do that job better than you (and yes, there is a person out there who can do that position better than you.)

Have fun, set high expectations and be deliberate. Most of all, remember it's all about the people. THEY are the company.

Rich McBee brings more than 25 years of experience in telecommunications to his position as President and Chief Executive Officer of Mitel, leading Mitel's strategy, business performance, and global execution. Appointed to the role in January 2011, Rich is responsible for advancing Mitel's evolution and leadership in the business communications market, driving revenue growth and profitability, and devising and executing business strategies.

SEE ALSO: I'm the CEO of a Fortune 500 company, and training for a half-marathon taught me 3 major business lessons

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Why horseshoe crab blood is so expensive

The Coast Guard is catching more drug-running subs, but most 'very stealthy' narco subs are probably going undetected

It looks like Amazon could be about to launch a full online store in Brazil — but a tough retail climate might make it 'uncomfortable' (AMZN)

$
0
0

Brazil

  • Amazon appears to be preparing to open a full online store in Brazil, according to analysts based in the country.
  • Brazil is a promising market because it is one of the largest developing economies in the world and the largest in Latin America.
  • Still, it has been difficult historically for foreign retailers to do business there.
  • Amazon has taken a slightly different, and slower, approach to entering Brazil than it has with its other international forays.

Amazon in Brazil could be about to take on a whole new meaning beyond the name of the enormous rainforest that runs through the country.

It's looking increasingly likely that the American e-commerce giant is about to become a bigger player in Brazil's shopping ecosystem.

Amazon has sold books and some digital services in Brazil since 2014. But according to analysts at the Brazil-based firm BTG Pactual, which cited talks with suppliers and partners, Amazon could be planning to open a full, direct online store selling a variety of other items — including toys, baby products, electronics, computers, and appliances — as soon as this month.

It's a move that has been brewing for a while. Brazil offers good prospects for foreign investment as it is one of the largest developing economies in the world and the largest in Latin America.

Reuters reported in February that Amazon was in talks with suppliers, had opened a warehouse for distributing goods, and had entered into talks with a freight airline. Bloomberg also reported this month that Amazon had entered into a pilot agreement with CargoX, a Brazilian trucking startup that focuses on moving cargo around the country.

Amazon declined to comment.

Amazon is also hiring direct retail positions in São Paulo, according to its job website. The advertised jobs include responsibilities like managing inventory (Senior Instock Manager) and managing relationships with vendors (Senior Vendor Manager Retail), which could indicate a ramping up of inventory. Amazon is hiring for 23 new positions on its retail team in São Paulo for Amazon.com.br.

Amazon has been looming over Brazil for a while. It has operated a marketplace — facilitating sales between third parties — for books, electronics, and home appliances since 2017.

But it has moved slowly in creating the same direct retail experience that it offers in the other global markets where it operates.

"They are uncomfortable in not being able to deliver a top-notch user experience," Fabio Monteiro, a retail research analyst at BTG Pactual, told Business Insider. "Brazil is one of the most complex countries to operate. If you are a foreign retailer, it's really complex."

There are many reasons for that, Monteiro said, including a complex tax structure that varies from state to state, and a logistics system that relies on traversing sometimes-dangerous roads because of a lack of rail and navigable waterways.

Payment systems are also different in Brazil. Many Brazilian customers expect retailers to offer payment plans, especially for high-ticket items, which involve the retailer taking on some credit risk that wouldn't normally be involved in a direct sale.

Brazil is also exiting a recession and weathering a political crisis, which could make selling there more risky than it might otherwise be.

There are many stories of foreign retailers pulling out of Brazil, either after experiencing the difficult retail climate for themselves or further evaluating the country and deciding not to start operating there. In June, Walmart announced it was pulling out of Brazil and selling its assets in the country to a local player. The deal was valued at next to nothing, and Reuters reported that Walmart owed $3 billion in back taxes to a variety of state governments in Brazil.

Amazon fulfillment center Seattle

Opening a full online store wouldn't change Amazon's pace of entry into the market, however. Amazon's relatively slow place is in contrast with the volume of its investment in other countries like India.

"They are not in a hurry in Brazil," Monteiro said. "The opportunity they are seeing in other places like India is greater."

It remains to be seen whether Amazon will ramp up its investment to become a dominant player in Brazil like it has done in other markets like the UK and Germany. If Amazon has any advantage over the country's incumbents, it would be in the technology they're bringing, Monteiro said. But that might not be enough to overcome the structural challenges.

"The problem is some of the processes that Amazon has that are kind of black boxes that they usually don't adapt when they enter a new country," Monteiro added. "In Brazil they are being forced to adapt this system. This is really a big nightmare for any technology company."

Have an Amazon news tip? Email this reporter at dgreen@businessinsider.com.

SEE ALSO: There's more evidence that the race for Amazon's HQ2 is still wide open

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Why silk is so expensive

Jon Gruden is reportedly set to start a 'fire sale' in Oakland and trade away 2 more top players

$
0
0

Jon Gruden

  • The Oakland Raiders are reportedly shopping former first-round picks Amari Cooper and Karl Joseph.
  • Dealing either of the two players would be yet another substantial roster shake-up by newly appointed head coach Jon Gruden.
  • Gruden's first foray into roster management with the Raiders included his widely criticized decision to trade away Khalil Mack.


Jon Gruden's tenure with the Oakland Raiders has not gotten off to a great start.

After bringing Gruden in on a 10-year deal worth $100 million, expectations were high in Oakland, but the Raiders have fallen well short of meeting them, stumbling out of the gate to a 1-4 record.

Gruden's most notable contribution to the team has not been anything he's brought to the Raiders, but rather what he has given away — namely, 2016 defensive player of the year Khalil Mack, who Gruden traded away to the Bears in a much-criticized move.

Now, it seems that Gruden isn't yet done tinkering with the Raiders roster, with Fox Sports' Jay Glazer reporting that Oakland is currently shopping two other former first-round draft picks — safety Karl Joseph and wide receiver Amari Cooper — for potential suitors. Glazer goes as far as to call it a "fire sale" in Oakland.

Gruden hasn't wasted his time reshaping the Raiders franchise, cutting ties with players like Michael Crabtree and Marquette King in addition to moving Mack in the 2018 offseason. 

With dramatic moves still potentially left to be made, it's clear that tearing down and attempting to build back up the Raiders roster will be one of the defining aspects of Gruden's comeback in Oakland. 

SEE ALSO: One year after Ben McAdoo was ripped for benching Eli Manning the move has proven prophetic

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: What it takes to be an NFL referee

25 photos show Hurricane Michael's destruction from the sky

$
0
0

mexico beach 3

Hurricane Michael left a wake of destruction after making landfall in Florida on Wednesday.

Among the hardest-hit areas was the small seaside town of Mexico Beach, where entire rows of homes by the ocean were swept away, leaving only their concrete foundations behind.

As residents returned to their homes and businesses, photojournalists used helicopters to document the damage from above. Here's what they found.

SEE ALSO: Florida homeowners got a surprise when 4 kittens fell out of their attic after the roof collapsed during Hurricane Michael

READ MORE: Before-and-after photos show Hurricane Michael's catastrophic destruction in Florida

Hurricane Michael made landfall near Mexico Beach, Florida, around noon local time on Wednesday as a Category 4 hurricane with 155 mph winds.

Source: Business Insider



That made it the third-strongest hurricane in history to make landfall in the continental US.

Source: Business Insider



Gov. Rick Scott of Florida said the National Guard rescued about 20 people who decided to ride out the storm in Mexico Beach.

Sources: Business InsiderAP



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Keep your day job, move slowly, and don't worry about building a unicorn: A New York 'startup school' eschews everything Silicon Valley ever preached

$
0
0

Tacklebox Accelerator

  • Many people wonder how to start a business successfully. According to Brian Scordato, the founder of Tacklebox Accelerator, the first thing to do is keep your day job.
  • Tacklebox is a six-week program geared toward founders with full-time jobs. Scordato helps those founders bring their business concepts to fruition, slowly and steadily.
  • Tacklebox doesn't take equity; instead it charges founders $2,500.
  • Scordato and Tacklebox alums and mentors say even if you go through the program and realize you don't want to pursue your business idea any longer, that's still a positive outcome.
  • Tacklebox has a broad definition of success, and Scordato thinks it's OK that not every company will be a billion-dollar business.

The first thing to know as a founder in Tacklebox Accelerator is that you will not "move fast and break things."

That mantra, once touted by Facebook and other tech companies, is antithetical to the Tacklebox approach to entrepreneurship. At the first of each session's six workshops, Tacklebox founder Brian Scordato says as much to the founders seated before him.

Instead, Tacklebox is about making slow and steady progress. Case in point: Scordato advises the founders not to quit their day job until they're (almost) certain their business is viable.

Launched in 2015, Tacklebox is a six-week program during which Scordato guides about eight founders, many of whom still have full-time jobs, in bringing their business ideas to fruition. Tacklebox isn't an accelerator in the traditional sense: Founders don't give up equity in their companies; instead, they pay $2,500 to attend what can seem like "startup school."

The goal, Scordato said, is to show founders that successful entrepreneurship is, above all, "practice-able and teachable and learnable."

Entrepreneurs who keep their day jobs may be more successful in the long run

Admittedly, the slow-and-steady strategy isn't the sexiest. A story about an entrepreneur who up and quit her day job to pursue her startup dreams is generally much more compelling than an entrepreneur who waited it out until the time was just right.

But Scordato makes a persuasive case for caution. "You're always proving that this is worth your time," he told me.

"A lot of our founders have really, really good jobs and they've busted their asses to create a little bit of savings," he said. "Most of our founders don't come in and say, 'I hate my job; I want to leave.' It's more like, 'I really, really like my job. It's helped me gain this certain insight and I want to start a company based on that. But I want to make sure that it's worth leaving this awesome job for it.'"

What's more, he said, having a full-time job means you necessarily have limited time to work on your business. So you have to prioritize, and do only the tasks that are most important. "It's interesting how it works when you force yourself into the confines to really focus on the 80/20 stuff," Scordato said, referring to the idea that 20% of your efforts often produce 80% of your results.

Scordato's observations are backed by some research and anecdotal evidence.

In his 2016 book, "Originals," Wharton professor Adam Grant wrote that, contrary to popular belief, the most successful entrepreneurs don't quit their day job to start a company. One University of Wisconsin study found that entrepreneurs who kept their day jobs were 33% less likely to fail than those who don't.

Grant cites the example of Bill Gates, who was testing his idea for Microsoft on the side before he took a leave of absence from Harvard to go all in.

Similarly, Kathryn Minshew, a cofounder and the CEO of The Muse, didn't quit her job at McKinsey until she was confident in the strength of her business. And the founders of jewelry company Aurate told Business Insider that starting a business on the side, while they were employed at Marc Jacobs and Goldman Sachs, made them better entrepreneurs.

"Some people think about founders and think about startups as 23-year-olds starting something, and it's actually a good idea for them to do it even if it fails. It's a cool life experience," Scordato said. "That's for the most part not my founders. My founders have enormous opportunity cost for starting these things."

Scordato also looks specifically for founders who have developed domain expertise over the course of their career. "You should have been subconsciously preparing to build this company for a long time, in a way such that your skill sets and knowledge bases have already distanced you from any competition," he said.

Indeed, an MIT study found the average age of a successful startup founder is 45. The study authors found that work experience explains much of the age advantage. They write in the Harvard Business Review,"Relative to founders with no relevant experience, those with at least three years of prior work experience in the same narrow industry as their startup were 85% more likely to launch a highly successful startup."

If a founder goes through Tacklebox and decides not to pursue their business idea, that's still considered a success

Tacklebox Accelerator

The most recent cohort of Tacklebox businesses included a dating app, a startup to make travel more comfortable, and a career-management platform.

I sat in on two of the workshops and listened to a recording of a third. At the first workshop, Scordato told the founders that sometimes, people get to the end of the program and realize they don't want to launch their startup. "That's OK, too," he said.

I was skeptical: Who spends six weeks and $2,500 only to realize, oops, their business idea stinks? But the Tacklebox alums I spoke with said they'd rather spend some time and money to realize their business idea isn't workable than quit their jobs and blow a huge amount of cash, only to reach the same conclusion a year down the line.

Shawn Cheng, a partner at the venture production studio ConsenSys Labs, has been a mentor to Scordato and to Tacklebox founders; he told me that the biggest value of the program is learning "how to learn," or learning "how to walk away."

Most startup accelerators take an "all or nothing" approach, Cheng said, in that you either build a company or waste everyone's time; Tacklebox is geared toward founders thinking that "they have an idea and they want to be testing it, and they want to be talking to more people about it, but they're not quite sure how they should validate it in order to put everything else in their lives on hold to pursue it."

Sam Alston, the founder of Big Lives, which identifies up-and-coming fashion designers, was in the eighth cohort of Tacklebox, in 2017. She credits the program with giving her the confidence to leave her job, as a client development director at Louis Vuitton.

Alston said she frequently recommends Tacklebox to aspiring entrepreneurs, noting that Scordato is transparent about the fact that "the skills that you gain should allow you to then test any business idea"— not just the one you're currently working on. "It's really selling a framework rather than consulting on a specific business."

Scordato also told me that a handful of founders have gone through Tacklebox with one business idea, realized they didn't like it, and waited another year or so before going through Tacklebox again with a better one.

It's a program Scordato might have benefited from earlier in his career. In the past 11 years, he's launched three startups, aside from Tacklebox: a recruiting platform for college basketball, a dating app, and a social-networking app. None of them are still in operation.

Scordato's real talent seems to be spotting other entrepreneurs with potential and giving them the guidance and mentorship they need to develop their nascent businesses. He also brings in a series of outside experts, including successful founders and investors like Cheng. Each cohort of founders gets a chance to pitch their businesses to a group of investors, less to convince them to sign on and more to get feedback about how well they articulate their business' mission and goals.

Unicorns aren't the only startups welcome at Tacklebox

Tacklebox Accelerator

Tacklebox has fed a few startups into Y Combinator, such as The Lobby, which gives job candidates a chance to chat with employees at top finance firms. While its founder Deepak Chhugani was in Tacklebox, he and Scordato devised a plan to get him into Y Combinator. Tacklebox also introduced Chuugani to Angela Lee, the founder of the venture-capital firm 37Angels and chief innovation officer at Columbia Business School, who wound up investing in The Lobby later on.

Chuugani is glad he went through Tacklebox before Y Combinator. He told me that, in Y Combinator, after three months, if you don't think your idea is viable, it's a much more high-stakes situation. "You're forced to find any idea that might work," he said, "because now you've raised money from the accelerator." He added, "YC changed my life," but "you should be a little bit prepared to know what you're getting yourself into if you're going to raise money."

Despite Chhugani's success, Scordato said that the majority of Tacklebox startups aren't suited to Y Combinator. The Lobby "has the potential to be a very high-growth, very huge exit sort of company," but it's an exception.

Some founders go onto more niche accelerators, like New York Fashion Tech Lab — but for about half of Tacklebox startups, Scordato said, "maybe they need a little bit of money to build the initial tech platform, or they need to hire someone to do that, but it's not going to be a big challenge. They can start operating and become profitable quickly."

Lee, the 37Angels founder, said Scordato and Tacklebox are more open-minded about success than most other startup accelerators. That is to say, getting into the uber-selective Y Combinator isn't the only measure of success.

Lee mentioned the concept of "lifestyle startups," a term that's emerged in the last decade to describe a business that doesn't need venture capital and won't necessarily be worth $1 billion, ever. Lee said the term is often perceived negatively; but lifestyle startups, she said, are welcomed at Tacklebox. A lifestyle startup can still bring in $10 million a year, she said — and "since when did making $10 million a year become a failure?"

"We LOVE those," Scordato wrote in an email, referring to lifestyle startups. "What we really stress is that companies that could be great lifestyle businesses and probably won't be unicorns shouldn't try to become unicorns. They should build sound, revenue-generating businesses that can build great products at a high margin for a (relatively) small group of customers."

In an irony that's not lost on its founder, Tacklebox itself is one such startup. "I love that Tacklebox is practicing what it's preaching," Cheng said. He mentioned that Tacklebox has already gone through several iterations, holding workshops on weekends, mornings, and evenings, and offering higher and lower price points.

"It's got to be scary for Brian," Cheng added, "but I commend him for that and for not being afraid of trying new things and experimenting."

SEE ALSO: 'Entrepreneurship porn' lures young people with a pretty picture of startup life, but it glosses over the most dangerous parts

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: I woke up at 4:30 a.m. for a week like a Navy SEAL


Meghan Markle's makeup artist reveals his beauty secrets

$
0
0

Celebrity makeup artist Daniel Martin is known for creating beautiful and natural makeup looks–including Meghan Markle's wedding-day makeup. We sat down with him in New York to discuss the no-makeup makeup trend, his go-to products, and steps to beautiful, glowy skin. 

Martin recently partnered with Hilton as part of the Hilton Passport Project to ensure travelers have picture-perfect passports with the goal of encouraging the 60% of Americans without passports to apply for one.

Following is a transcript of the video.

Daniel Martin: Hi guys, I'm Daniel Martin. I'm a celebrity makeup artist based here in New York City.

I think people resonate with the makeup that I do, and the point of view that I do, because for the past few years, we've been living in a time where, through social media, especially Instagram, we've been seeing so much makeup. It almost became normal, so I feel like, especially through Meghan's wedding, that she kinda showed the world that you don't need a lot to be comfortable in your own skin, and I think now, people are starting to feel confident, and owning their own beauty, because they don't need a lot.

Depending on the person, there's definitely a lot of makeup that goes into a no-makeup makeup, but I would say that good skin care practices definitely make a huge difference in feeling confident in not putting anything on. But at the end of the day, you wanna be able to own your own beauty, whether that's a dark eye, or a red lip, almost wearing it like a lip balm. You find what you're most proud of, and just accentuate that, because at the end of the day, it's about owning your own beauty and feeling confident in your own skin.

For beautiful, glowy skin, my must-have products would be... Tatcha makes this incredible primer that blurs out imperfections, and it creates this nice luminosity to the skin. Honest Beauty has this incredible magic balm that you can use on the highest parts of your face. It's this beautiful emollient base that you can actually hydrate your lips with. I've used it on the collarbone, the eyelids. Also, Dior. The Backstage foundation adds this beautiful medium coverage to the skin that looks like skin, so you can use it with your finger, you can use it with a brush, but it gives you that really beautiful radiance that everybody wants, that thinks that they need a lot of time to do, but they actually don't.

If you're gonna splurge on any product, I would say it's your skincare. You do wanna take care of your skin, and I feel like if you take care of your skin, whatever makeup you put on top of it will just lay beautifully, so I would spend more money on your complexion products, rather than color.

Steps to glowy skin is to, one, make sure that the skin's at a neutral place, being that you want to use a toner to kind of balance out the pH, so you kinda see where any redness is, or any kind of dehydration is happening on your skin. The second part is to use a moisturizer, all over the face, to really understand where your glowy parts are. And then, after you've done your skin care, you can go in and use foundation, usually in the T-zone, to even out any kind of redness or discoloration, and then use either a cream highlighter or a powder in the highest parts of your face, so it'd be around the cheek, brow bone, Cupid's bow, just really pop those areas on the face.

I think what's on trend for fall, for makeup, is you're going to see a lot more people comfortable in their own skin, and not wearing a lot of makeup. It's either gonna be like a funky color in the eye, or an accent lip, or maybe something different embellished on the face, like a rhinestone glued by the eye or something. But I feel like it's about individuality this season, and I feel like, culturally, it's about that as well. About owning your own beauty.

Join the conversation about this story »

Trump just met with a classic-rock legend and a missile-defense expert — and it was the same guy

Richard Branson is sitting on a $5 billion fortune but spent years cringing over displays of wealth — see how the eccentric billionaire likes to spend his money

$
0
0

richard branson

  • Sir Richard Branson, founder of the Virgin Group, has an estimated net worth of $5 billion.
  • When he spends his money indulgently, it's only to make money in return — like renting out real estate he owns, such as Necker Island.
  • In fact, Branson once said in an interview that he's "embarrassed" by displays of wealth, like leaving large tips and buying things for "pure luxury."
  • A member of the Giving Pledge, Branson would rather spend his money on philanthropy.

Nearly 50 years after dropping out of high school at age 15 and founding his first business, Sir Richard Branson is now the billionaire chair of the Virgin Group, which brings in more than $21 billion annually in global revenue.

Having overseen approximately 500 companies, Branson, who is known for his charisma and eccentric behaviors, has an estimated net worth of $5 billion.

Ever the savvy businessman, Branson has spent some of his billions indulgently, but only to make money in return — like renting out real estate he owns (think Necker Island). When it comes down to it, Branson is rather frugal, opting not to own objects of pure luxury. He also donates much of his time and money to philanthropic efforts.

Below, see how the eccentric leader spends his billions.

SEE ALSO: Warren Buffett is the world's third-richest man — see how the notoriously frugal billionaire spends his fortune

DON'T MISS: Bill Gates is worth $95 billion and he plans to give most of it away — here's how he spends his money now, from a luxury car collection to incredible real estate

Richard Branson launched his first business at age 15. In 1972, he founded Virgin Records and went on to launch the Virgin Group conglomerate. Through this, he's built an estimated $5 billion net worth.

Source:Forbes, Business Insider



Branson is well-known for his jet-setting adventures and eccentricity, such as dressing as a butterfly to run a marathon.

Source: Business Insider



Virgin Media, Virgin Australia, and Virgin Atlantic are some of the biggest companies under Virgin Group.

Source:Financial Times



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

So many animals will go extinct in the next 50 years that it will take Earth at least 3 million years to recover, a study has found

$
0
0

indri madagascar

  • The Earth is undergoing a mass extinction, which is caused by human activity that destroys habitats and kills off species.
  • In a new study, Danish researchers concluded that so many mammal species will go extinct in the next 50 years that the planet's evolutionary diversity won't recover for at least 3 million years. 
  • The scientists said their findings could be used to help determine which endangered species are the biggest priorities for conservation efforts.

Humans will cause so many mammal species to go extinct in the next 50 years that the planet's evolutionary diversity won't recover for 3 to 5 million years, a team of researchers has found.

The Earth may be entering its sixth mass extinction: an era in which the planet's environments change so much that most animal and plant species die out. The International Union for the Conservation of Nature predicts that 99.9% of critically endangered species and 67% of endangered species will be lost within the next 100 years.

The five other times a mass extinction has occurred over the past 450 million years, natural disasters were to blame. But now, human activity is killing mammal species.

In a study published Monday in the journal PNAS, scientists from Aarhus University in Denmark calculated how fast extinctions are happening, and how long it would take for evolution to bring Earth back to the level of biodiversity it currently has.

The scientists concluded that in a best-case scenario, nature will need 3-5 million years to get back to the level of biodiversity we have on Earth today. Returning to the state Earth's animal kingdom was in before modern humans evolved would take 5-7 million years.

Evolution can't keep up

Evolution is the planet's defense mechanism against the loss of biodiversity. As habitats and climates change, species that can't survive die, and new species slowly emerge. But it takes a long time for new species to fill the gaps — and that process is far slower than the rate at which humans are causing mammals to go extinct.

For their calculations, the Aarhus University researchers used a database containing existing mammal species and mammals that already went extinct as humans spread across the planet. They combined that data with information about extinctions expected to come in the next 50 years, and used advanced simulations of evolution to predict how long recovery would take.

Their estimates are based on an optimistic assumption that people will eventually stop ruining habitats and causing species to die out, and the extinction rate will go back down. But even in that best-case scenario, the timeline depends on how quickly mammals start recovering. If the extinction rate doesn't start falling for another 20-100 years, more species will likely disappear, causing greater diversity loss, the study said.

Litopterns mammal extinction

The researchers noted that in their model, certain species were given more importance than others. Matt Davis, a paleontologist at Aarhus University who led the study, cited the shrew as an example. There are hundreds of species of shrew, so if one or two go extinct, that would not kill off all shrews on Earth.

But there were only four species of sabre-toothed tigers on the planet. So when they all went extinct, many years of evolutionary history disappeared with them. 

"Large mammals, or megafauna, such as giant sloths and sabre-toothed tigers, which became extinct about 10,000 years ago, were highly evolutionarily distinct," Davis said in a press release. "Since they had few close relatives, their extinctions meant that entire branches of Earth's evolutionary tree were chopped off."

The research could help conservationists  

Today, other large animals like the black rhino are facing extinction. Asian elephants' chance of making it to the 22nd century is less than 33%, the study found. These elephants are one of only two remaining species from a group of mammals that once included mastodons and mammoths.

"We now live in a world that is becoming increasingly impoverished of large wild mammalian species," Jens-Christian Svenning, an Aarhus University professor who researches megafauna, said in the press release. "The few remaining giants, such as rhinos and elephants, are in danger of being wiped out very rapidly."

He noted that the planet no longer boasts giant beavers, giant deer, or giant armadillos.

Though the researchers' findings are dire, the scientists said their work could be used to figure out which endangered species are evolutionarily unique, which might help conservationists decide where to focus their efforts to prevent the most devastating extinctions.

SEE ALSO: 13 rare animals that are teetering on the brink of extinction

SEE ALSO: Study reveals how 500 years of human exploitation has created a dangerous 'extinction vortex' in one of the world's most important forests

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Researchers want to try a cutting-edge technique to save rhinos from extinction

Instacart crashed late Sunday, leaving furious shoppers waiting all night for deliveries that never arrived

$
0
0

instacart shopper suv

  • Instacart's network crashed late Sunday, leaving customers waiting hours for food deliveries that never arrived. 
  • "I waited close to 6 hours for my order before canceling it," one customer tweeted. "The worst service ever."
  • Some customers said they were unable to cancel orders that were automatically rescheduled to the middle of the night or the following day. 
  • The network issue has since been resolved, and impacted customers can now cancel or reschedule their orders, according to someone with knowledge of the company's outage.

Dozens of Instacart customers are furious after a network outage left them waiting all night for food deliveries that never arrived. 

"Do NOT subscribe to Instacart," Mick Weidner wrote on Twitter. "They screwed up my order yesterday. I tried to contact them in multiple ways. I tried to cancel my subscription and was told I can't. So I resubmitted my order and it appears that the order didn't process. Terrible company!"

Another customer tweeted: "I waited close to 6 hours for my order before canceling it. The worst service ever."

Instacart confirmed the outage on Twitter, writing, "Our site is currently experiencing technical difficulties. We are actively working on the issue and apologize for the inconvenience."

Dozens of people took to social media to complain that the company never directly notified customers of the outage. Several said they were unable to reach Instacart's customer service when their orders failed to arrive. Some said their orders were automatically rescheduled to the middle of the night or the next day.

"I ordered Instacart today to be delivered in two hours," one customer tweeted. "They never showed up, didn't notify me or anything. I log in to check status and they postponed it to tomorrow from 9-11 am when I'll be at work. I’m furious. No response back to my complaint."

On Monday morning, some customers said they still hadn't heard anything from Instacart about the outage or what would happen to their missing deliveries. 

The outage also impacted Instacart employees who fill and deliver shoppers' orders.

"I am a shopper and was stuck at the grocery store from 6 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. last night," Stephanie Abene tweeted. "Due to the outage, I was never able to checkout and deliver a very difficult and substitution heavy order to my customer. I want to be compensated for my time and the inconvenience."

The network issue has since been resolved, and impacted customers can now cancel or reschedule their orders, according to someone with knowledge of the company's outage.

Here's what customers are saying on Twitter about the incident:

 

 

 

SEE ALSO: Sears is shuttering 142 stores, with liquidation sales starting immediately — here's the complete list of closing stores

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Why vanilla is so expensive

'To them it was a science fiction story': A VC who dropped out of MIT at age 14 explains why investors are starting to pour hundreds of millions into a field they had previously snubbed

$
0
0

laura deming

  • When Laura Deming launched the Longevity Fund seven years ago, there weren't many investments going into experimental treatments aimed at helping us live healthier and longer. 
  • But now, the anti-aging field about to take off, she says. She's backed five companies, which have gone on to raise hundreds of millions from investors. 
  • "We've seen what happens with no resources," Deming told Business Insider. "Now that we have resources what will happen?"

Laura Deming isn't new to investing in aging.

Since launching her Longevity Fund seven years ago, she's seen the industry go from one side of the spectrum — little to no funding, and in turn, little research happening — to today's explosion of interest from investors in funding work to get humans living healthier and longer. 

Deming has backed five companies which have gone on to raise a combined $500 million in capital. One of her investments, Unity Biotechnology, went public in 2018 and entered human trials in June.

On Wednesday, her first class of companies graduated from her fund's Age1 accelerator, aimed at helping younger companies advance their research. The six companies include one focused on hibernation and how humans could tap into animals' "superpowers" and a spin-out from a regenerative medicine lab that's focused on reversing arthritis. Others, like Spring Discovery, are aiming to speed up the process of discovering new aging therapies.

Deming, who's now 24, recalls when she first tried to fundraise for her fund after moving to the Bay Area. When first talking to the biotech venture capital crowd, they were skeptical. 

"To them it was a science fiction story," Deming said. For the most part, biotech investments had been flowing into cancer-focused biotechs, another area that's been exploding. In 2017 alone, $133 billion was spent on cancer treatments, and there were an estimated 700 companies have cancer drugs in development. 

"I don't blame them, if I were in their shoes having spent the past two decades investing in cancer how would I process the idea of aging?" she said.

The anti-aging field has seen its fair share of failures, as well. For example, Elixir Pharmaceuticals, a company founded in the early 2000s that was backed by ARCH Ventures, ultimately shut down.

These days, Deming isn't alone in the space. Companies like Alphabet's Calico and drug giant Novartis have also taken up research on aging, while startups like Ambrosia Medical are embarking on controversial research, charging $8,000 to participate in a trial to see how blood transfusions from younger people. And analysts expect one type of anti-aging therapeutic, known as senolytics, to upend a $20 billion market.  

Now, Deming has heard from investors looking for her help vetting potential investments in the space. Ideally, the more capital flowing into the space, the more the field can advance. To be sure, drug development is risky, and it's possible the field of aging will see failures in the future — potentially alongside successes. 

"We've seen what happens with no resources," she said. "Now that we have resources what will happen?"

See also:

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 3 surprising ways humans are still evolving

The cofounder of Instagram on why he left Facebook: 'No one ever leaves a job because everything's awesome' (FB)

$
0
0

kevin systrom instagram

  • Instagram cofounder Kevin Systrom has spoken out about why he left the company in September.
  • Speaking at a conference on Monday, the entrepreneur admitted that "no one ever leaves a job because everything is awesome."
  • There have been reports of tensions between Facebook CEO and Kevin Systrom (and fellow cofounder Mike Krieger) prior to his departure.

Instagram's former CEO Kevin Systrom has spoken out about his exit from the company he cofounded, admitting that "no one ever leaves a job because everything is awesome."

Appearing onstage at the Wired 25 conference in San Francisco on Monday, the social media exec made his first major public remarks since the news broke he was quitting Instagram in September. The 34-year-old entrepreneur cofounded Instagram with Mike Krieger in 2010, and remain at the company after it was acquired by Facebook for $1 billion in 2012.

There have been multiple reports in the media that Systrom and Krieger's joint departure was at least in part due to tensions with Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, and disagreements about the direction of the product.

Systrom acknowledged there were some tensions — while playing down their impact and speaking more broadly about his future.

"I think any time you leave anything it's sad, even if it's your decision," Systrom said. "But at the same time you can't evolve as an individual or a person unless you make big changes in your life. And no decision is either all good- or all bad-feeling, it's always a mix of the two, but that's not a reason not to do it."

He added: "To be clear, when you leave something, sometimes it's because it's incompatible with what you wanna do, or things change or whatever, but in this case there are no hard feelings at all. I'm excited to do something new and I think Instagram's in a really, really good place."

So what is the new thing Systrom is planning to do next? The exec declined to comment on any future business ventures, though said he has been taking flying lessons, spending time with his nine-year-old daughter, and providing some mentorship to companies he has previously made angel investments in.

But his remarks suggested he was definitely considering starting a new business: "I'm 34, I think I have a few more Instagrams, time-wise, in me," he said. "I'm not sure that we'll ever do something nearly as impactful."

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Apple took another subtle jab at Facebook during its iPhone XS event


Bedbugs and fleas can both make you itch — here's how to tell which one you have

$
0
0

flea versus bed bugBedbugs and fleas are two blood-sucking bugs that can be tough to deal with. And although they do have similarities, the differences between them are pretty distinct— and some of the biggest differences come down to their bites. 

Here are some of the major similarities and differences between bedbugs and fleas if you aren't quite sure what bug you're dealing with. 

Both bugs survive on their host's blood.

Bedbugs and fleas survive on blood from a host, according to Terminix. This means that both bedbugs and fleas will try to bite humans and animals when necessary.

Both insects only like the blood from mammals, and bedbugs prefer humans. Fleas typically prefer the blood of furry mammals, but they can jump onto humans and bite them as well.

 

 



Fleas and bedbugs have some similarities.

Both small, wingless insects, fleas and bedbugs are a reddish-brown color. Although both bugs are visible to the naked eye, they often come into your home without a trace.

 

 



Bedbugs and fleas are nocturnal.

Fleas and bedbugs can loosely be labeled as nocturnal, meaning they are usually more active at night. This makes it harder to spot them, especially if you don't have any itchy, red bites.

Both bugs can live for quite a long time without blood from a host, fleas for up to 100 days and bedbugs for up to a few weeks

Read More: Here's what to do when you find out you have bedbugs



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Why hurricanes hardly ever hit Europe

$
0
0

You don't have to live far inland to avoid hurricanes. Just move to Europe. It rarely sees full-on hurricanes. But that may soon change. Following is a transcript of the video.

Europe hasn't had a hurricane reach its shore in over 50 years. Now don't get the wrong idea. Hurricane season still brings a hefty dose of wind and rain. But Europe has something that North America doesn't, when it comes to protection against hurricanes. Location.

Hurricanes usually form off the coast of West Africa, where warm water near the Equator and high humidity create columns of rapidly rising rotating air. It's the perfect recipe for a storm. Now the more warm, moist air that the system picks up, the stronger it becomes. That's why a tropical storms can quickly grow into a full on hurricane as it marches across the Atlantic. Now normally hurricanes are propelled on a westward track by the trade winds, caused by the Earth's rotation. That's why Europe as well as the West Coast of the US, rarely experience full on hurricanes. But that's not the whole story.

After all, since the year 2000, remnants of around 30 hurricanes have reached Europe. For comparison, Florida has seen 79 real hurricanes over the same time frame. By the time these remnants make landfall, they've went from a hurricane force, to a tropical storm or weaker. And that's where Europe's location comes into play. In order for a hurricane to head towards Europe, something crucial has to happen. It has to travel really far North by about 200 miles. Once a storm system reaches 30 degrees north, it encounters the subtropical jet stream. Which moves in the opposite direction of the trade winds. And therefore, blows the storm East But because the storm is now farther North, the waters underneath are colder by up to about five to 10 degrees Celsius. Which means less energy available to feed the storm. And as a result, it starts to die down by the time it's headed for Europe. Even though it's no longer a hurricane, it still packs a punch when it hits shore. In fact, most of these hurricane remnants will combine with other nearby cyclones and weather fronts, that create high winds and rain that mainly hit Ireland and Great Britain. But have been known to reach as far as Greece or even farther in Northern Russia. Typical damages include power outages, flooding, and occasionally casualties. Most recently the remnants of Hurricane Ophelia made landfall in Ireland and Scotland in 2017. About 50,000 households in Northern Ireland lost power. Three deaths were reported and downed trees closed many of the public roads and highways. This was the worst storm that Ireland had seen in 50 years. And it may be a sign of what's to come.

As global surface temperatures rise, it will also increase the sea surface temperatures in the Northern Atlantic. Which researchers estimate could contribute to an increase in the number of hurricane force storms that reach Europe. Some experts predict that by the end of the 21st century, Europe could experience, on average, 13 powerful storms each year during hurricane season. Compared to the two per year it sees now.

Join the conversation about this story »

A wave of senior departures, lost market share, and a 20% drop in fees: A dismal year in investment banking at Bank of America (BAC)

$
0
0

Brian Moynihan

  • Bank of America Merrill Lynch's investment banking woes continue to mount.
  • While overall profits in the third-quarter soared 32% to $7.2 billion, investment banking fees in the firm's Global Banking division fell 20% to $643 million.
  • It was the continuation of a dismal year for the unit, which has lost market share to its top rivals and dropped in the league tables.
  • The bank has also experienced a wave of senior departures, with more managing director exits in investment banking since 2017 than any of its US competitors, according to a report.
  • "This is about renewing our focus and reenergizing our teams," CFO Paul Donofrio said on Monday.

Investment banking was one of the few sore spots in an otherwise strong third-quarter earnings report for Bank of America Merrill Lynch.

While overall profits in the third-quarter soared 32% to $7.2 billion, investment banking fees in the firm's Global Banking division dropped 20% to $643 million. 

It was the continuation of a dismal year for the unit, which for the first nine months of 2017 saw fees dip 20% from $2.7 billion to $2.1 billion. JPMorgan Chase and Citigroup reported earnings Friday and saw smaller investment banking declines of 1% and 8%, respectively. 

In earnings calls on Monday with the media and analysts, Bank of America top executives said the division isn't living up to its potential.

"I know we can do better. I came from investment banking. I know they've built a great business, they have great bankers. We have one of the best platforms on the planet," CFO Paul Donofrio said. "This is about renewing our focus and reenergizing our teams."

While investment banking comprises a much smaller slice of Bank of America's business than its powerhouse consumer retail division — which reported $3.1 billion in profits in the quarter — the firm is a perennial a top-three player on global dealmaking league tables. It has slipped to fourth thus far in 2018, losing market share while rivals have made significant gains, according to data from Dealogic.

The firm's share in global investment banking fees dropped to 5.7% — down from 6% in 2016 and 2017 — while JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley all posted gains. 

The decline has happened amid a bumper year for mergers-and-acquisitions, with a record $3.1 trillion in announced deals in the first three quarters.

There's no single explanation for the investment banking drop-off, though many cite a too-conservative approach, which grew even more risk averse following the $292 million loss on a margin loan involving South African retailer Steinhoff International in the fourth quarter of 2017. 

The firm's leaders noted the episodic nature of dealmaking, and the misfortune of having huge deals fall through, as Bank of America did with the potential $34 billion Comcast-21st Century Fox deal, which crumbled in July after Disney swooped in with a higher bid. 

Some have questioned leadership at the top. Outgoing corporate and investment banking chief Christian Meissner, and his lieutenant and head of investment banking Diego De Giorgi, have taken heat for allegedly creating factions and alienating some bankers. 

It's unclear whether that's to blame for senior bankers jumping ship, but Bank of America has experienced more churn than its US competitors in investment banking.

The bank lost 28 managing directors in investment banking to other banks in 2017 and the first half of 2018, according to data from a top Wall Street headhunting firm. Among those losses are Aaron Packles, co-head of US financial institutions banking, who left for Jefferies, and Bill Frauenhofer, head of global semiconductors banking, who left for Morgan Stanley.

By contrast, JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs lost 13 MDs during that span and Morgan Stanley lost 22, according to the report. 

That tally doesn't include departures to the buy-side, corporations, or out of the industry, such as capital markets chief A.J. Murphy, who left in May to private-equity firm Silver Lake, or Anwar Zakkour, the global head of technology banking, who departed in January. 

A Bank of America spokesman noted that the investment bank has hired 49 MDs since 2017. 

Executives said Monday they were confident in their deal pipeline and that the business would rebound, a turnaround effort that will be spearheaded by Matthew Koder, the president of the firm's Asia-Pacific operations and Meissner's replacement.

"We know we can get our fair share out of that business," CEO Brian Moynihan said on the earnings call with analysts. "We can do better and we'll just keep pushing away at it."

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Beware one huge mistake investors often make when the economy is at a crossroads, says Charles Schwab’s investment chief

Stephen Hawking's warning that genetically altered superhumans could wipe out the rest of us doesn't mention a likely characteristic of the future elite

$
0
0

Stephen Hawking

  • The Sunday Times published an excerpt from Stephen Hawking's posthumously-published book "Brief Answers to the Big Questions" in which the esteemed scientist warned that genetically-enhanced humans could become a dominant overclass.
  • This is a concept that has been explored in science fiction, and emerging technologies combined with rising inequality could lead to such a dystopian outcome.
  • Hawking doesn't write that the first humans to take advantage of genetic modification will be the ones who can afford it, but it's hardly a stretch to expect the ultra-rich to become the first super-humans.

The Sunday Times published an excerpt from Stephen Hawking's posthumously-published book "Brief Answers to the Big Questions," to be released Tuesday, October 16.

In it, Hawking wrote that humanity is "now entering a new phase of what might be called self-designed evolution, in which we will be able to change and improve our DNA." He predicted that, while it's likely that we would begin with medical interventions to cure or prevent genetic diseases, scientists would eventually discover how to modify more complex traits like intelligence and aggressiveness.

Hawking warned that the power to change DNA could lead to the emergence of a genetically-enhanced elite that could eventually dominate or even wipe out the genetic have-nots of a future civilization:

"But some people won't be able to resist the temptation to improve human characteristics, such as size of memory, resistance to disease and length of life.

"Once such superhumans appear, there are going to be significant political problems with the unimproved humans, who won't be able to compete. Presumably, they will die out, or become unimportant. Instead, there will be a race of self-designing beings who are improving themselves at an ever-increasing rate."

So the ultra-elite of the future will be healthy, intelligent, and long-lived. They'll probably also be rich.

Fast Company's Michael Grothaus pointed out that it's not unlikely the super humans will be ultra-rich. After all, who can afford the newest, ground-breaking technology? The people who can afford everything else.

Looking at the current state of society, one can see how Hawking could extrapolate such a genetically polarized future, and how money would factor into it. Income and wealth inequality are high and rising, while intergenerational mobility is stagnant in many parts of the US, as The New York Times recently reported.

Emerging technologies like fast genome sequencing and genetic modification using CRISPR, if accessible only to a small, wealthy elite, could lead to the kind of genetic class divide Hawking described.

The idea of genetic enhancement leading to a dominant class of superhumans has been explored in science fiction, including the classic Star Trek episode "Space Seed" and the 1997 movie "Gattaca." As Professor Hawking warned, emerging technologies could make those dystopian visions come true.

Read the full excerpt from "Brief Answers to the Big Questions" at the Sunday Times here.

SEE ALSO: The economy of every state, ranked from worst to best

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: I woke up at 4:30 a.m. for a week like a Navy SEAL

4 reasons why you're not losing weight on a gluten-free diet

$
0
0

Gluten-free bread

  • Many people confuse the gluten-free diet for a weight-loss diet.
  • Some people need gluten-free diets because they are intolerant or sensitive to the protein commonly found in wheat, rye, and barley.
  • A gluten-free diet is not necessarily healthier than a normal diet, which is often why it's not linked with weight loss.

You may have heard the term "gluten-free" lately, but are likely a little confused about what exactly gluten is.

According to the Celiac Disease Foundation, gluten is a protein found in cereal grains like wheat, rye, and barley. Unfortunately, because "gluten-free" is often followed by the word "diet," many people have equated a gluten-free diet with a weight-loss diet, which it is not.

People who live by a gluten-free diet do so because they have a gluten intolerance or sensitivity. A gluten-free diet simply means a diet that is free from gluten.

The reason you're not losing weight on a gluten-free diet is that you're not supposed to, much in the same way that you wouldn't lose weight on a peanut-free diet because of a peanut allergy.

Bonnie Taub-Dix, RDN, creator of BetterThanDieting.com and author of "Read It Before You Eat It - Taking You from Label to Table," explained to INSIDER that "you're not losing weight [because] gluten-free doesn't mean that it is low in fat or low in calories or low in sodium. It doesn't really mean that it's healthy just because it doesn't have gluten in it."

Or as David L. Katz, MD, MPH, FACPM, FACP, FACLM and author of the book "The Truth about Food: Why Pandas Eat Bamboo and People Get Bamboozled" put it, "gluten-free, per se, tells you nothing about the overall nutritional quality."

Many people confuse "diet" with "dietary restrictions"

spanish restaurant bread

Yes, it's called a "gluten-free diet," but more accurately, it is a dietary restriction. Because of the prevalence of gluten-free food in the news and celebrities who talk up their "gluten-free diets," many individuals mistakenly think that it's a new weight loss diet when it's not.

"Gluten-free became so popular in the news," Dr. Taux-Dix explained, "and when something is in the headlines — especially for people that haven't been successful on other diets — they just want to be the hummingbird of diets and jump on this one too."

Dr. Taub-Dix also added that people often mistakenly conflate "gluten-free diet" with "weight loss diet" because people falsely equate the word "free" with "low calories" and "diet" with "weight loss."

In actuality, the only people who need a gluten-free diet are those with gluten intolerances (i.e. celiac disease) or those with a sensitivity to it (i.e. IBS, migraines, etc).

Gluten-free is confused for a carb-free diet

pizza hut gluten-free

There have been many variations on the "carb-free" diet over the years — the Atkins diet, for example — many of which reportedly helped people lose weight, but gluten-free is not carb-free. Because gluten is in all bread products, people have conflated it with what they traditionally call "carbs."

"[Gluten-free] does not mean that it's calorie free or even carb free," Dr. Taub-Dix stated.

Going gluten-free is not healthier for you

Gluten Free Bread

If you don't have a gluten sensitivity, there is no real reason to avoid it — in fact, avoiding gluten when you have no reason to do so, can actually hurt your health.

"There are many good and bad foods with and without gluten," according to Dr. Katz. "But that simply means that cutting gluten makes no sense unless you are sensitive to gluten. There are far better ways to improve your diet, because cutting gluten could very well lower the overall quality of the diet, by taking out whole grains, and replacing them with gluten-free junk."

Whole grains are often the biggest missing piece in gluten-free diets, which provide b vitamins and fiber — something that most gluten-free "grain" substitutes cannot.

Dr. Katz said, for example, that "whole wheat bread will be at least as nutritious, and often more so than any gluten-free counterpart." Plus, Dr. Katz added that when someone goes on a gluten-free diet, they consume less fiber overall, and fiber plays an important role in weight loss.

In fact, most gluten-free bread varieties are made with a combination of potato and tapioca starches, xanthan gum, and other flour alternatives that contain very little nutritional value, whereas the whole grains found in "normal bread"are natural sources of fiber.

There is so much gluten-free "junk food" available now

gluten free cupcakes

There are now so many gluten-free junk food substitutes that are just as unhealthy in large doses as the real thing "

"Gluten-free doughnuts and gluten free candy and gluten free cookies are not exactly healthy foods just because they don't have gluten in it," said Dr. Taub-Dix.

Oftentimes, gluten-free individuals might feel deprived of the snacks they used to enjoy, so they overeat with gluten-free junk food. In fact, Dr. Katz says that the food industry knows that gluten-free individuals feel deprived and do everything to serve them the cookies, cakes, and crackers they used to love but in new gluten-free form.

At the end of the day, Dr. Katz put it simply: "There is no reason to cut gluten for weight loss. None. Zero. Cutting gluten means no whole grain oats or wheat, two highly nutritious foods, good for both health and weight control."

When you see a product in the store labeled "gluten-free," all that means is that there is no gluten in it, which is an indicator to individuals who are allergic or sensitive to it.

Visit INSIDER's homepage for more.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's what caffeine does to your body and brain

Viewing all 76301 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images