Quantcast
Channel: Business Insider
Viewing all 76301 articles
Browse latest View live

The cannabis producer Cronos goes bananas after 'Mad Money' host Jim Cramer called it '2nd best' in the industry (CRON)

$
0
0

jim cramer

  • Cronos, the Canadian cannabis producer, gained more than 15% Monday after getting an endorsement from the "Mad Money" host Jim Cramer.
  • After Friday's closing bell, Cramer said the company was the "second best" in the industry, behind Canopy Growth.
  • Back in December, the cigarette maker Altria invested 2.4 billion Canadian dollars, or $1.8 billion, in Cronos.
  • Watch Cronos trade live.

The Canadian cannabis producer Cronos soared Monday, gaining more than 15%, after getting an endorsement following Friday's closing bell from the "Mad Money" host Jim Cramer.

"They've got a very important tie-up with Altria,"Cramer said during the "lightning round" part of his show. "We have been recommending, just so you know, that Canopy CGC is the best. But Cronos is second best and it's been a fantastic stock. It has very good management, by the way."

In December, the cigarette giant Altria invested 2.4 billion Canadian dollars, or $1.8 billion, in Cronos in an effort to diversify away from its cigarette business.

"Altria is the ideal partner for Cronos Group, providing the resources and expertise we need to meaningfully accelerate our strategic growth," Cronos CEO Mike Gorenstein said in a press release at the time.

"The proceeds from Altria's investment will enable us to more quickly expand our global infrastructure and distribution footprint, while also increasing investments in R&D and brands that resonate with our consumers."

And last February, Cronos became the first company that grows and sells marijuana to be listed on a US exchange, paving the way for others in the industry.

Cronos has been red-hot in 2019, up more than 76% including Monday's gain. It was trading near $18.50 a share.

Cronos

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: North Korea's leader Kim Jong Un is 35 — here's how he became one of the world's scariest dictators


These are the top 15 US banks ranked by the mobile banking features consumers value most

$
0
0

This is a preview of a research report from Business Insider Intelligence, Business Insider's premium research service. This report is exclusively available to enterprise subscribers. To learn more about getting access to this report, email Senior Account Executive Chris Roth at croth@businessinsider.com, or check to see if your company already has access


New data shows that mobile features have become a key factor that customers weigh when choosing a bank. 

Screen Shot 2018 11 30 at 4.34.28 PMIn Business Insider Intelligence's second annual Mobile Banking Competitive Edge study, 64% of mobile banking users said that they would research a bank's mobile banking capabilities before opening an account with them. And 61% said that they would switch banks if their bank offered a poor mobile banking experience.

For channel strategists, the challenge in attracting mobile-minded customers is knowing when to bet budgets and political capital on developing emerging features. It's complicated by most flashy features — such as voice assistants, smartwatch banking, and bank-offered mobile wallets — being deemed a "must" by analysts, media, and rival banking executives. 

4by3catThe Mobile Banking Competitive Edge Report uses data to inform channel investment decisions by highlighting which mobile banking features are most valuable to customers. Our study has data on consumer demand for 33 in-demand mobile capabilities across six key categories. 

Using that consumer data, the study benchmarks the largest 20 banks and credit unions in the US by whether they offer the cutting-edge mobile features that customers say they care about most. What sets our benchmark apart is that it weights every feature according to customer demand data — not subjective analyst opinion.  

Channel strategists within financial institutions use our report to see which innovative features they should prioritize in development pipelines and to find out how they compare with rival banks and credit unions in offering those features.

Business Insider Intelligence fielded the Mobile Banking Competitive Edge Study to members of its proprietary panel in August 2018, reaching over 1,200 US consumers — primarily handpicked digital professionals and early-adopters, making our sample a sensitive indicator of emerging features. 

Here are a few key takeaways from the report:

  • Citi snagged first overall. The bank led the account access section, tied for first in account management, and ranked highly in all the other categories of the study. Wells Fargo took second place, leading in security and control and transfers. USAA came in third, NFCU was fourth, and Bank of America rounded out the top five.
  • Demand for security features is sizzling. Following a year of huge breaches being announced at companies like Facebook and Google, consumers' security concerns jumped to become the most important category. The category included the No. 1 feature overall: the ability to turn a payment card on or off. 
  • Digital money management features are also highly demanded. Chase and Wells Fargo may be onto something with their millennial-focused banking apps, Finn and Greenhouse, as the generation had sky-high demand for the six features in the category. The most popular feature in the category was the ability to separate recurring payments, such as Netflix and gym memberships.

 In full, the report:

  • Shows how 33 mobile features stack up according to how valuable customers say they are.
  • Ranks the top 20 US banks and credit unions on whether they offer each of those features.
  • Analyzes how demographics effect demand for different mobile features.
  • Provides strategies for banks to best attract and retain customers with mobile features.
  • Contains 63 pages and 30 figures.

The full report is available to Business Insider Intelligence enterprise clients. To learn more about this report, email Senior Account Executive Chris Roth (croth@businessinsider.com).  

Business Insider Intelligence's Mobile Banking Competitive Edge study includes: Ally, Bank of America, BB&T, BBVA Compass, BMO Harris, Capital One, Chase, Citibank, Fifth Third, HSBC, KeyBank, Navy Federal Credit Union, PNC, Regions, SunTrust, TD, Union Bank, US Bank, USAA, and Wells Fargo.

SEE ALSO: These are the trends creating new winners and losers in the card-processing ecosystem

Join the conversation about this story »

Dunkin’ is selling a donut filled with cookie dough and brownie batter for Valentine’s Day

$
0
0

Cookie Dough _ Brownie Batter Double Filled Donut

  • Dunkin' is selling its first-ever double-filled donut for Valentine's Day.
  • It features cookie dough-flavored buttercream and brownie batter flavored filling.
  • The brand is also selling heart-shaped donuts and Bling Sprinkles Donuts for the season.

Dunkin' may have dropped the "Donuts" from its name, but the brand's commitment to creating new donut flavors has stayed strong.

This Valentine's Day, Dunkin' will be selling its first-ever donut with two different fillings: the Cookie Dough and Brownie Batter Double-Filled Donut.

"Available for a limited time, this square-shaped specialty donut is perfect for sharing with your perfect pairing,"the brand explained in a press release. The donut in question will have twice the regular filling with both brownie batter-flavored buttercream filling and cookie dough-flavored filling. It will also be iced with chocolate and sprinkled with crumbled pie topping.

Dunkin' is offering other limited edition donuts for Valentine's Day, too

Valentines Day Donuts

Dunkin' is also reviving its heart-shaped donuts in both Boston Kreme and Jelly flavors and unveiling Bling Sprinkles Donuts in Chocolate Bling Frosted, Strawberry Bling Frosted, and Vanilla Bling Frosted.

These tasty new treats and old favorites will only be available for a limited time

new dunkin logo cups

The treats will likely be available until the end of February. And while enjoying your treats, you can also check out Dunkin's rebranded logo. Earlier this year, the brand officially dropped the "Donuts" part of their name and the new packaging and branding has been introduced in 2019.  

Visit INSIDER's homepage for more.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Japanese lifestyle guru Marie Kondo explains how to organize your home once and never again

Delta, United, and American bracing for monster storm and issuing travel vouchers. Here's what to know if you're flying.

$
0
0

snow airport

  • Winter Storm Jayden is expected dump heavy snow across the Midwest and Northeast.
  • Even the Deep South will get some snow.
  • In preparation, Delta, United, American, and others are letting passengers traveling this week rebook tickets free.

The National Weather Service has issued winter-storm warnings and watches across much of the Midwest, Deep South, and Northeast.

People in cities such as Chicago, Atlanta, and Detroit should prepare this week for Winter Storm Jayden, which is expected to dump heavy snow.

That's in addition to what the weather service is referring to as a "very dangerous and life-threatening arctic air mass" sweeping the region.

It's just bad news for those with travel plans.

More than a thousand flights out of Chicago's two major airports had been cancelled as of 4 p.m. on Monday, according to the Chicago Department of Aviation. Flights arriving at O'Hare were delayed by 80 minutes, on average, and departing flights by 31 minutes.

Many airlines are offering vouchers in preparation.

Delta

Over the weekend, Delta issued a weather waiver for those traveling on January 27 and 28 through 16 Midwestern airports, including Chicago's O'Hare and Midway.

Delta said those who have travel plans involving those 16 airports can make a one-time change to their travel plans with no fee. You can see the full list here.

United

United is offering travel vouchers for those traveling across the Eastern US between January 27 and February 1. The dates are different for each city, but the latest travel can be booked is February 4.

United provides more information here.

JetBlue

Those flying traveling on January 27 or 28 through Chicago or Minneapolis-Saint Paul must reschedule their flights on a date no later than January 30. JetBlue's travel alert page explains how.

Southwest

Flights to airports in Chicago, Atlanta, New York (LaGuardia), and more are all eligible to be rebooked free. Winter Storm Jayden is expected to hit those regions at different days throughout the week, and eligibility for rebooking is different for each city.

Those flights need to be rescheduled on a date no more than two weeks from their original date of travel. Here's more information.

American Airlines

For those traveling on January 29 or 30 through American Airlines in the Northeast US and Canada, passengers can change their flight for no additional fee. Tickets must be rebooked for a date between January 28 and February 2.

The same stipulation applies for the Upper Midwest for flights booked on January 27 or 28. Tickets have to be changed to somewhere from January 26 to February 1. For Chicago only, a trip booked January 27 to 30 can be changed in the date range of January 25 and February 3.

More information available for American Airlines here.

Frontier

Frontier has already canceled several flights in the upper Midwest. Other trips can be rebooked free.

Travel booked between January 27 and 29 to airports in that region, including Minneapolis/St. Paul and Detroit, can be rebooked free for a date no later than February 13. Learn how to rebook your Frontier flight here.

Spirit

Flights to Chicago and Detroit on January 27-28 must be rebooked by January 31. If booked for a date later than January 31, there won't be a modification change but the fare may be different.

More information available from Spirit here.

Did we miss any airlines? Contact the reporter at rpremack@businessinsider.com.

SEE ALSO: These 20 airlines are the least likely to have delayed flights

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: What it's like to win the Gumball 3000 where drivers party until 2 am every night and drive 3,000 miles in 7 days

The government shutdown may be over, but the damage to national parks like Joshua Tree and Yellowstone could be permanent

$
0
0

national parks trash HIGH RES

  • The government shutdown is over, but conservationists are warning that it may have caused permanent damage to national parks.  
  • A former employee at Joshua Tree National Park called the effects "irreparable" at a rally the day after the shutdown.
  • Illegal activity at national parks may have threatened wildlife ecosystems and altered animals' behavior. 
  • Diverting entrance fees to keep the parks open could also have lasting financial repercussions. 

A day after President Trump declared an end to the government shutdown, more than 100 people gathered for a rally near Joshua Tree National Park in Southern California. The rally originally aimed to oppose the shutdown, but it quickly morphed into a critique of America's attitude toward national parks. 

During prior shutdowns, administrations have suspended all operations at parks, including visitor access. The Trump administration deviated from this standard by leaving parks open to the public, with only certain federal employees around to provide emergency services.

Read more:National parks have already reached a nightmare scenario during the government shutdown

The shortage of park employees led to major damage, including garbage scattered along major highways and restrooms overflowing with trash and human feces.

These acts of vandalism are now being cleaned up by volunteers and park rangers, but their financial and environmental impacts — including damage to wildfire, infrastructure, and local ecosystems — could linger for years to come.

Joshua Tree was among the parks hit hardest by the shutdown, with reports of visitors defacing rocks with graffiti, camping illegally, and cutting down trees that have been around for centuries.

joshua tree trash

The activity forced the park to temporarily close its campgrounds, although it managed to remain open to visitors, despite previously announcing that it would shutter its gates.

At Saturday's rally, a retired Joshua Tree superintendent, Curt Sauer, told the crowd that the park had been forced to operate with only 40% of its maintenance staff and 20% of its resource management scientists. He also said that the park diverted $300,000 worth of entrance fees — which were supposed to go toward maintaining trails, upgrading campgrounds, and building a new visitor center — to continue operations during the shutdown.  

"You were told that the park was adequately staffed and protected," Sauer said to protesters. "That was a false statement from Washington. It was a kind of, you know, fake news!"

Parks are still concerned about safety

As a wave of parks begins to resume normal operations, park rangers will be tasked with assessing the damage inflicted by their absence. 

While some parks employees returned to work smiling and eager to welcome visitors, many are scrambling to ensure that conditions are safe for the public. 

At Death Valley National Park, on the border of California and Nevada, staffers are working to remove flood debris from the water system at a campground. 

Employees at Olympic National Park in Washington are plowing roads, clearing toppled trees, and conducting safety checks. The park's popular mountainous area, Hurricane Ridge, won't resume operations until February 1st.  

Mesa Verde National Park in Colorado will also hold off on reopening until February 4th, giving employees time to repair a road and guardrail that were damaged by falling rocks.

Environmental damage could be permanent

While some parks have set aside days for repairs, other issues could take much longer to fix. 

By week four of the shutdown, a senior director at the National Parks Conservation Association (NPCA), John Garder, estimated that the damage to national parks "could last years, if not decades."

In some cases, he said, the effects could be permanent.

This sentiment was echoed by Curt Sauer, who predicted that what happened to Joshua Tree during the shutdown would be "irreparable for the next 200 to 300 years."

joshua tree

Much of the damage has to with long-term threats to wildlife and the environmental ecosystem. 

"There is a biological crust on the soil [in national parks] that supports a web of life," said Garner. "Damage to those soils by people parking or camping in inappropriate places could last for decades because of the sensitivity of that fragile ecosystem."

Garner also pointed to illegal off-roading in places like Joshua Tree and Death Valley, which could pose a similar threat.

One hazard that's difficult to assess is the amount of wildlife that might have been exposed to human trash.

"Whether it's a fox, a coyote, or a raccoon, any kind of wildlife that gets into human trash can lead to problems for that animal later because they will seek it out as a food source," said Bart Melton, the wildlife program director at NPCA. Bears that gain access to human food can lose their fear of people and potentially attack.

Melton also noted that the shutdown put on a hold on critical wildlife research, including research on endangered species.

With the staff at Yellowstone National Park on furlough, he said, no one was around to monitor species like elk, wolves, or grizzly bears.

The shutdown also pressed pause on the world’s longest continuous study of predators and prey, which had been tracking the activity of wolves at Isle Royale National Park in Michigan for 60 years. Researchers were put on furlough just after the first set of wolves was reintroduced to the habitat. 

"To have a gap in that study right after the wolves were reintroduced is a real shame," said Melon. "I’m sure that's going to be a blank spot on the page."

The financial repercussions are long-lasting

The effects on scientific studies, wildlife habitats, and environmental ecosystems are made more egregious by a lack of funding for the National Parks Service, which has long been deficient in both cash and resources.  

Over the last several years, Garner said, parks have seen an increase in visitors, but a steady decrease in staff. Even before the shutdown, the NPS was hamstrung by a $11.6 billion backlog on repairs.

The parks service now faces more than $13 million in uncollected entrance fee revenue as a result of the shutdown, according to the NPCA. That's on top of any new financial burdens created while employees were out, including cleanup efforts and stalled maintenance projects.

“If the parks service isn't provided with additional money from Congress to address the financial impacts of the shutdown, it's fair to say that this is going to further challenge an already underfunded agency, which is deeply concerning," said Garner.

Even more concerning, he said, is damage that cannot be fixed with funding.

"There could [have been] looting of irreplaceable artifacts or vandalism to sites of historical significance," he told Business Insider. "Some damage can be repaired, but some things can be lost forever."

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Bed bug infestations are only getting worse — here's why they're so hard to kill

An NYU professor says the debate about the future of AI is distorted by 'a tremendous amount of misplaced optimism and fear'

$
0
0

amy webb

  • Amy Webb is an NYU professor and futurist who studies artificial intelligence.
  • At a Davos panel of AI experts, she argued that the exaggerated fears and optimism around the technology come from ignoring the fact that humans are in charge of its development and use.
  • She cautioned against both the current American and Chinese approaches, of a lack or abundance of oversight, and advocated for setting both national and international regulations and standards.
  • This article is part of Business Insider's ongoing series on Better Capitalism.

It can be hard to distinguish sci-fi fantasies from projections on where artificial intelligence is headed.

New York University professor Amy Webb, who is also the founder of the Future Today Institute and author of the upcoming book "The Big Nine," put it bluntly: "There's a tremendous amount of misplaced optimism and fear when it comes to AI."

Webb was one of the members of the panel moderated by Wired's editor in chief, Nicholas Thompson, at the World Economic Forum's 2019 annual conference in Davos, Switzerland. "I think the key issue, not just in a regulatory issue conversation framework, but just in general for us all to bear in mind, is there are nine companies that control the future of AI, and as AI is the next era of computing, we ought to be paying attention to them," Webb said.

Those nine companies are the American giants Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Facebook, IBM, and Apple (which Webb likes to call the G-MAFIA), as well as the Chinese internet leaders Baidu, Alibaba, and Tencent (commonly referred to as the BAT companies).

Webb explained:

"The challenge is that there's a relatively few number of people who are making decisions on behalf of us all. And it's not just software at this point. They are building the frameworks, they are building custom silicon, and every single company has to align themselves with one of these big nine. And every single consumer is touching one of those companies.

"The G-MAFIA are publicly traded companies and they are, as a result of that, very much beholden to Wall St. In the United States, we have no regulations, so there's an antagonistic relationship between DC and the Valley. And in China, Baidu, Alibaba, and Tencent are also independent companies — it's China, so they're tethered to the wills of Beijing.

"And this sets, I think, humanity and democracy as we know it up for some challenges in the years to come."

So what does that mean?

Well, first of all, Webb said, "'AI' is a pretty meaningless term that even the AI community itself disagrees on." Her fellow panelists Lee Kai-Fu, Chinese venture capitalist and AI researcher, and David Siegel, computer scientist and investor, agreed, noting that AI has become a catch-all for software that can use data sets to influence decisions it makes on its own. To Webb's overall point about the confusion around AI developments, Lee added that, at least right now, AI's use of "deep learning" is a tool for humans.

Webb explained that it's necessary to understand that we're in charge of AI. There is nothing inevitable about an AI revolution, and that's why it's worth taking a sober look at what AI is and whose hands are on the dials.

Don't fear the robots — be wary of the people who control them

In another Davos presentation, MIT researcher Joy Buolamwini illustrated how facial-recognition AI learns from given data sets. She shared her team's research with IBM, which showed that while its software was highly accurate in recognizing light-skinned faces, it had difficulty recognizing faces of people with dark complexions. IBM had its team bolster its data set and made the tool substantially more accurate.

Read more: Top highlights from Davos 2019

Similarly, AI has the potential to assist medical professionals with predictive analytics, but in the United States, software has been largely reliant on synthetic data sets due to privacy issues. AI is not an unstoppable, omniscient force, but is very much in our control.

In the panel, Webb argued that as the use of AI as a tool proliferates, governments will need to make important decisions. She expressed skepticism of both the prevailing approaches thus far: the American approach of no oversight or the Chinese approach of total oversight.

Webb said that while countries will have their own priorities, there needs to be private-public partnerships over establishing guidelines for how citizens' data is collected and how it will be utilized by AI-powered software.

Over the next 50 years, we shouldn't be afraid of a sci-fi style threat from rebellious sentient robots, but we should be wary of how both corporations and governments are utilizing increasingly sophisticated software. We need to set rules and standards for the sake of individuals' rights, Webb argued. AI is a tool, and while dangerous in the wrong hands, it's one that has the potential to better the lives of millions of people.

As she wrote in the introduction to her book, "The Big Nine aren't the villains in this story. In fact, they are our best hope for our future."

You can watch the full panel discussion below:

SEE ALSO: An MIT researcher who analyzed facial recognition software found eliminating bias in AI is a matter of priorities

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Reddit cofounder Alexis Ohanian isn't worried about Elon Musk's vision of 'Terminator'-like robots taking over humanity

These 5 hedge funds may have gotten hit the hardest by Nvidia's plunging stock (NVDA)

$
0
0

nvidia jen-hsun huang ceo


Nvidia plunged 14% Monday after the chipmaker slashed its fourth-quarter revenue guidance, citing significantly weaker economic conditions in China. Five hedge funds could have lost hundreds of millions of dollars as a result of the warning.

"Q4 was an extraordinary, unusually turbulent, and disappointing quarter,"Jensen Huang, Nvidia founder and CEO, said in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

"As we worked through Q4, the global economy decelerated sharply, particularly in China, affecting consumer demand for NVIDIA gaming GPUs. Also, with initial shipments of new high-end RTX GPUs selling above MSRP, some customers may have delayed their purchase while waiting for lower price points and further demonstrations of RTX technology in actual games."

The chipmaker cut its revenue guidance to $2.2 billion, plus or minus 2%. Previously, it expected revenue of $2.7 billion, plus or minus 2%.

And some of Nvidia's biggest shareholders, famous names in the hedge fund industry, could be paying the price. By Markets Insider's calculation, Nvidia's plunge on Tuesday could have caused the five biggest hedge-fund investors to lose $202 million in total.

To clarify, the firms could have sold their shares before Monday, avoiding some or all of the decline. Additionally, they could have hedged their positions, offsetting any losses.

Below are five hedge funds that own the largest positions in Nvidia, according to their most recent filings:

Coatue Management

Position: 1,110,330 shares

Percent of Nvidia outstanding: 0.18%

Potential loss: $24.6 million

 

Source: Bloomberg



AQR Capital Management

Position: 1,554,254 shares

Percent of Nvidia outstanding: 0.25%

Potential loss: $34.4 million

AQR did not immediately respond to request for comment.

 

Source: Bloomberg



Renaissance Technologies

Position: 2,091,465 shares

Percent of Nvidia outstanding: 0.34%

Potential loss: $46.3 million

Renaissance did not immediately respond to request for comment.

 

Source: Bloomberg



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Here's an early glimpse into the autonomous trucking market — and how self-driving technology is disrupting the way goods are delivered

$
0
0

autonomous trucking graphic

This is a preview of a research report from Business Insider Intelligence, Business Insider's premium research service. To learn more about Business Insider Intelligence, click here. Current subscribers can read the report here.

Trucking is set to transform radically in the coming years, with innovative technologies enabling trucks to take over more and more driving responsibilities, saving time and money for operators and businesses that rely on shipping.

Autonomous trucks are being tested on roads around the world, and systems from startups like Peloton and Embark could make their way into commercial trucks as soon as next year. Fleets will be able to leverage autonomous technologies to cut costs and gain a critical edge over competitors.

But to start planning for, and to eventually implement, those technologies, companies need to know what sorts of systems will be ready and when, and what regulatory hurdles will need to be overcome to get autonomous trucks on the road. 

In The Autonomous Trucking Report, Business Insider Intelligence provides an early glimpse into the emerging autonomous trucking market. First, we look at the trucking market as it stands today, offering a basic profile of the industry and highlighting a number of the challenges and issues it faces. Then, we go through the three waves of autonomous technology that are set to upend the industry — platooning, semi-autonomous systems, and fully autonomous trucks — looking at who is making strides in each of these areas, when the technology can be expected to start making an impact, and what companies can do to get ahead of the curve.

Here are some of the key takeaways:

  • Advanced and autonomous technology will enable operators and shipping firms to eradicate some of the challenges that have long plagued them. Trucks will take over more and more driving responsibilities, saving time and money for operators and businesses that rely on shipping.
  • The impact of autonomous technologies on the trucking industry will come in three major waves: platooning or fuel-saving vehicle convoys, semi-autonomous highway control systems, and fully autonomous trucks.
  • Change to the trucking industry will be gradual but inexorable. Companies with foresight can start to make long-term plans to account for the ways that autonomous technologies will change how goods and products move from place to place.

In full, the report:

  • Analyzes the development of autonomous trucking technology.
  • Explains the waves in which advanced and autonomous technologies will start to impact the trucking industry, providing detailed explanations of how a company can take advantage of the disruptive technology transforming logistics at each stage.
  • Profiles the efforts of the companies that are at the forefront of new technology in trucking, looking at what they're working on and when their efforts could start to impact the market.

To get this report, subscribe to a Premium pass to Business Insider Intelligence and gain immediate access to:

This report and more than 275 other expertly researched reports
Access to all future reports and daily newsletters
Forecasts of new and emerging technologies in your industry
And more!
Learn More

Or, purchase & download The Autonomous Trucking Report directly from our research store

Join the conversation about this story »


This $150 exercise device mimics what NASA sends into space with astronauts — I thought it was gimmicky at first, but I'm still using it 2 months later

$
0
0

The Insider Picks team writes about stuff we think you'll like. Business Insider has affiliate partnerships, so we get a share of the revenue from your purchase.

OYO

  • A high-quality exercise device is easy to use, motivates you enough to keep you coming back to it, and provides noticeable improvements to your health.
  • I like the OYO Personal Gym because you can adjust the resistance to really push yourself, and it comes with access to dozens of workout videos, including the 10-Week Challenge.
  • Though it's more expensive than some home gym equipment (currently starting at $149.95 on Amazon), it's more affordable than a gym membership, is backed by a full three-year warranty, and you can easily bring it with you when traveling.

From the Shake Weight to the Thighmaster to the Body Blade, there are countless gimmicky exercise devices that prey on people trying to turn over a new leaf in their physical fitness. Most of this equipment is eventually donated to secondhand stores where they serve as just another exhibit in the "Museum of Fitness Fads Gone Bad."

At first, I thought the OYO Personal Gym was going to be another of these short-lived crazes. But, after coming back to it time and again for the last 60 days, my opinion has changed. Read on to learn more about my experiences with this device.

OYO fitness 3

My first experiences with the OYO Personal Gym

OYO sent me both versions of their personal gym to test: the Pro and the LE. Both options come with two 10-pound and one five-pound flex packs, leg and door anchors, an exercise wall chart, and a nutrition guide. Both are backed by a full three-year warranty. The OYO Personal Gym works by providing between 10 and 25 pounds of resistance as you push it together or pull it apart with your hands or with the attachments. You adjust the resistance using the flex packs provided.

The Pro version of the gym costs $50 more than the LE and connects to the OYO app on iOS devices via Bluetooth. The app keeps track of how many reps you have completed, logs your workouts, and offers coaching advice based on your workouts.

The same technology astronauts use in space

For this review, I had the opportunity to talk to former astronaut Dr. Leroy Chiao, who spent over six months on the International Space Station and is a spokesperson for the OYO Personal Gym. "When up in orbit, it's very important to exercise," Dr. Chiao said. "On Earth, if you miss a workout, you at least walk around a bit to work the muscles. In space, it's more like you're laying in bed for months at a time. Without exercise, your muscles quickly atrophy and your bones demineralize."

"When I was up in space, I used what was called the iRED, or Interim Resistive Exercise Device," Dr. Chiao continued. "I came back physically stronger in each physical test, and I had immeasurable bone loss in the bone density scan. This was a testament to the effectiveness of the iRED."

"Fairly recently, Paul Francis (founder and CEO of OYO Fitness) got in touch with me to let me know he created the iRED and had patented the SpiraFlex technology and used it in the OYO. I became very interested." Dr. Chiao now brings the OYO with him when he's traveling so he can get his exercise in.

OYO

How the OYO Personal Gym performed

At first, it took a little getting used to the OYO. Specifically, when I was transitioning from pulling the ball-like handles out to pushing them together, I had to make sure that the dowels attached to the handles were back to their original position, or else I couldn't squeeze the device together properly. After the first couple of workouts, I had the hang of it and rarely ran into trouble with this.

I really liked that OYO made it clear where I should start by offering the 10-Week Challenge. This is a series of 36 workout videos that feature a broad array of exercises performed in three to five circuits. Each exercise lasts approximately 30 seconds for the first three weeks. Then, OYO Director of Fitness Nick Bolton ups it to one minute per exercise. And, with week 5, the challenge shifts from three workouts per week to four.

Since I had other training regimens I had to stay on top of for roller derby, I didn't stick with the schedule of the 10-Week Challenge, but I still got a lot out of progressing through it. As of this writing, I'm through week 7 of the challenge.

I received the OYO right as the Michigan weather made outdoor exercise virtually unbearable. Fortunately, this device made it so I didn't have to step outdoors to get a dripping-sweat workout. I got in the habit of working out first thing in the morning – before I was awake enough to talk myself out of it. I found it was an excellent way to start the day. It got my blood flowing and helped me keep my focus throughout the day.

OYO

Some concerns about the device

I was not a fan of the OYO app. First of all, all of my devices are Android so I had to borrow my wife's phone to use the app. I had to reconnect each time I used the OYO device, which took a few tries. I didn't find the rep tracking to be all that helpful, and I already keep a log of my workouts in a spreadsheet so I didn't need the log feature. If you do go with the Pro version and want to follow the workouts, I recommend casting your device onto a larger screen. It's difficult and awkward to try to watch the videos on a small iPhone screen.

I found the leg attachments and door anchors were only marginally useful. I didn't use the door anchors at any point. None of the 10-Week Challenge exercise videos I followed used them. The leg attachments were cumbersome. They were okay attached to the ankles during hip opening and squeezing exercises, but beyond that, it got dicey.

Specifically, the single-leg kickback was the bane of my existence. I was supposed to attach one leg attachment to my bicep and the other to my ankle then kick back while on my hands and knees. The attachment did not fit on my large bicep. So, I put it on my wrist. The motion was still so uncomfortable that I had to modify the exercise.

The bottom line

Overall, I am surprised by how helpful the OYO Personal Gym is. As a runner, cyclist, and roller derby skater, I primarily focus on my legs and have neglected my upper body for decades. Consequently, I suffer from chronic back pain. The OYO Personal Gym changed all of this. Now, I have an easy way to fit a challenging full-body workout into my fitness regimen without having to leave my home. I strongly recommend the OYO to anyone interested in improving their overall physical fitness. I also suggest that you seriously commit to the 10-Week Challenge if you do give the OYO a shot.

Buy the OYO Personal Gym on Amazon starting at $149.95

Join the conversation about this story »

Amazon's playbook for upending healthcare is getting clearer, and pharmaceutical companies can't wait for the tech giant to make its move

$
0
0

Jeff Bezos

Amazon has the entire $3.5 trillion healthcare industry on edge.

News of the retail behemoth's acquisition of PillPack, its plans for a joint healthcare venture with JPMorgan and Berkshire Hathaway, and its work supplying hospitals with health equipment have all sent would-be competitors like pharmacies and drug wholesalers into a tizzy.

The fear is that Amazon will upend the healthcare industry, relentlessly compressing health companies' margins and siphoning off their customers in the same way it has in the publishing and retail industries. Yet we're still in the early innings of figuring out Amazon's healthcare ambitions, and the company has said little about them publicly. For instance, while it seems likely that Amazon could get involved in selling and shipping drugs or medical equipment, it's unclear what impact it could have on the big pharmaceutical companies themselves.

While on a trip to San Francisco for the annual J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference, Business Insider asked pharmaceutical executives and healthcare experts for their perspectives on Amazon's healthcare strategy — and whether they think Amazon will become a competitor. Amazon did not immediately return a request for comment.

When it comes to Amazon's healthcare ambitions, one thing is clear: "They're going to do a lot,"Jorge Conde, a general partner at venture-capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, told Business Insider.

That's based on the moves Amazon has already made, like the PillPack acquisition and the health joint venture, as well as Amazon's work in genomics through Amazon Web Services. Conde sees the retail giant going beyond that.

"They're going to straddle the entire healthcare value chain in some way, shape, or form," Conde said.

The ultimate disintermediator

For the most part, the pharmaceutical executives Business Insider spoke with didn't see themselves as the entities that would face disruption. The business of developing new pharmaceuticals and manufacturing them is a time- and capital-intensive process.

Rather, Amazon's potential — as the pharmaceutical industry sees it — has everything to do with how it could affect the rest of the healthcare industry.

"The big, big potential improvement frankly is on the rest," said Hervé Hoppenot, CEO of cancer drugmaker Incyte.

From when a drug is made to when a patient picks it up at a pharmacy counter, as many as five companies can be involved. Each company makes a tidy profit along the way. And as prices increase, so do those profits. Pharmaceutical companies have been pointing to the intermediaries in the system as the reason for the rising prescription costs patients are facing at the pharmacy counter.

Read more:The CEO of Merck has an ominous warning for the middlemen who stand between drug makers and patients

Christi Shaw, the president of Lilly Bio-Medicines, the business within Eli Lilly that comprises neuroscience and immunology, said she personally is hopeful that tech companies could help patients better afford medications.

"It'd be nice to go back to making medicines that help improve patients' lives and not be focused on the questions of access and rebates," Shaw said.

"I'm of the mind that if an Amazon can take the distribution system, fine," Shaw said. "If Google can help us with technology to better improve patient outcomes, that's going to help patients. It's going to increase the bar for innovation, it's going to give us real-time data, it's going to tell us how we can price to the value of the outcome. So I'm extremely excited about it and I wish they could go faster."

Paul Hudson, the CEO of Swiss drug giant Novartis's pharmaceuticals unit, is also eager to see what Amazon and other tech companies bring to the table.

"I love the tech potential disruption to our industry. I think we should have to stay relevant," Hudson told Business Insider.

Novartis for its part has been pushing to increase the use of technology in its business.

"We have a digital-data obsession that means that we won't be one of the losers. Perhaps we're one of the biggest winners," Hudson said. "The world is not a piece of paper with a prescription on it anymore."

Amazon could be a partner for big pharma

Some pharmaceutical leaders see Amazon as a potential partner. Rick Suarez, AstraZeneca's vice president of US market access, is in charge of making sure patients get access to their medications, including working with health insurers and employers.

"There is tremendous opportunity for public and private partnerships that would include new partners in the marketplace," Suarez told Business Insider.

That's especially true in the context of the healthcare joint venture that aims to lower costs for Amazon, JPMorgan, and Berkshire Hathaway employees.

"If there is an opportunity to work closely to solve for issues that their employee population would have been plagued by — for example, diabetes or cancer or respiratory — there's a huge opportunity for us at AstraZeneca to be a partner," Suarez said.

The potential to make disruptive moves

Nina Kjellson, a general partner at venture firm Canaan Partners, has been watching with interest the areas where Amazon has already started selling health-related goods, such as durable medical equipment and over-the-counter medications.

Should Amazon start to dispense and ship prescription drugs as well, companies like CVS Caremark and Express Scripts, which have businesses mailing out prescriptions, should be terrified, she said.

"They have the wherewithal to be the mother of all mail-order pharmacies," Kjellson said.

Hudson said he met with the PillPack team at the JPMorgan conference and they told him a little about their initial goals.

"They don't talk about dominating the world," Hudson said. "They talk about understanding consumers as patients and distributing medicines to them in a way that suits the patient best. I get that. We'll wait and see what that looks like."

Axel Bouchon, who heads up Leaps by Bayer, an organization within pharma giant Bayer focused on finding and funding breakthroughs, sees tech companies dipping their toes into healthcare in areas that are the closest to their hearts.

For Google, that's through processing data in companies such as Verily. For Apple, that's through the Apple Watch and its health tracking. But for the big tech players — including Amazon — he doesn't see those moves as their big jumps into healthcare.

"Like Amazon bought Whole Foods, someone will buy a pharmaceutical player," Bouchon said. Or a pharmaceutical company could buy a tech player, he said. "I think it works both ways."

When Amazon bought Whole Foods, Bouchon said he remembers thinking that was a smart deal. Collaborations can only get you so far — once you own a business, you can get a better understanding of it.

But in the meantime, Amazon's already cemented itself as a player in the healthcare industry.

"Will they be a significant player? They already are," Conde said.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The worst thing people do to wake up in the morning, according to a sleep scientist

12 pantry staples that don't last as long as you think they do

$
0
0

pantry-shelves-food-groceries

  • Whether dealing with pantry staples or leftovers that we put in the back of the freezer and totally forget about, it's easy to think that certain foods will last forever — or at least for a very long time.
  • But some foods expire much more quickly than you'd think, potentially leading to illness or an overall unpleasant taste.
  • INSIDER spoke with two chefs and a registered dietitian, and they told us about many foods don't last nearly as long as you think they do.

Few of us are able to reasonably consume all of our food before it expires — after all, expiration dates aren't always the best guideline to work from, because plenty of foods last much longer than we might believe, leading many of us to throw out food that is still safe to eat.

But then life gets in the way and we end up with a stocked pantry or freezer filled with food that sits for days, weeks, months … or even years, and we're left wondering if those pantry staples like canned tomatoes or frozen leftovers are safe to eat, especially when they look and smell totally fine.

INSIDER spoke with two chefs and a registered dietitian, and they told us about many of the foods that don't last nearly as long as you think they do and some of them will definitely surprise you.

Check your condiments — opened ketchup and mayonnaise can go bad within weeks.

Ketchup and mayo aren't refrigerated in stores and often have listed expiration dates years in the future, but that doesn't mean your jumbo jar of mayo will last into the next presidency.

According to Isabel Maples, MEd, RDN, a Virginia-based registered dietitian nutritionist and volunteer spokesperson for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, you should consume your favorite condiments within weeks, even if they're refrigerated.

She says that ketchup and chili sauce are safe for up to 12 months if unopened, but should be consumed within one month if opened. Mayo will last 10 to 12 weeks in the fridge once opened.

The trouble with condiments is that "the texture and flavor will be compromised," according to Alisa Rosa, an executive chef.

Mustard, however, will last up to two years if unopened, around six to eight months if opened and un-refrigerated, but longer if kept sealed in the fridge.



Tea and coffee can go bad much more quickly than you'd think.

We tend to think that "nonperishable" means it will last forever, but this is rarely the case, according to our experts.

In fact, tea, including tea bags, loose teas, and instant tea, should be consumed within one year. "The oils in tea will go rancid," explained Rosa.

As for coffee, Rosa told INSIDER that the beans or grounds will go rancid "after time … especially if the packaging has been opened." Maples recommends consuming within two to four weeks if opened and a year if unopened. For instant coffee, java drinkers can eke out a bit more time: two months if opened and six months if unopened. She adds, "For longer shelf life, store in the freezer, not the refrigerator."



Some canned goods can last up to five years — others expire much more quickly.

Stocking up on canned goods might seem like a good way to save money on pantry essentials so that you'll always have them on hand. But the safety of these items typically depends on how acidic the canned good is … meaning tomato-based cans and canned fruits like pineapple will lose their quality much faster.

Maples recommends consuming highly acidic canned goods within 18 months, adding, "canned goods like green beans are probably good for five years even they aren't stored in a crawl space or attic where they're exposed to heat."

"Use a first-in, first-out rotation to use up older pantry items first. Inspect cans before using them; avoid bulging, cracked or leaking cans," she told INSIDER. "Don't use cans that squirt liquid when opened. And don't taste the contents to see if they are safe — just throw them away. Look at ‘best by' and ‘expiration dates' when cleaning out your pantry."

"For most pantry items, the issue in storing foods too long is food quality, not food safety," she said, adding, "Never taste foods to see if they are safe. Pathogens are usually not detected like that but still can make you sick." The ideal storage temps for pantry items range between 50 and 70 degrees, according to Maples.

All three experts agree that canned goods will begin to taste less like what they should and more like a metallic "can," thanks to broken down texture over time.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Why the esports audience is set to surge — and how brands can take advantage of increased fans and viewership

$
0
0

This is a preview of a research report from Business Insider Intelligence, Business Insider's premium research service. To learn more about Business Insider Intelligence, click here. Current subscribers can read the report here.

esports audience 2 1

Esports, which is short for electronic sports, refers to competitive video gaming watched by spectators. Esports are not as mainstream as traditional sports in the US, but the number of esports fans globally is still sizable. The worldwide esports audience reached 335 million in 2017, according to Newzoo. 

And there’s still significant room for growth beyond that — we predict that 600 million consumers globally will watch esports in 2023, up 79% from 2017. 

A growing number of brands are acting to capitalize on the growth of esports as the majority of professional gaming fans are millennials and open to brand sponsors. Sixty-two percent of US esports viewers are aged 18-34, according to Activate, while 58% have a positive attitude towards brand involvement in esports, per Nielsen.

Meanwhile, Newzoo anticipates global esports sponsorship revenue to reach $359 million in 2018, up 53% year-over-year. The growing esports audience and brand activity helps explains why high-profile public figures are jumping in to capitalize on the action: In late October, basketball legend Michael Jordan and platinum-selling artist Drake both made investments into separate esports ventures, for example. 

In this report, Business Insider Intelligence will explain the growth of the esports audience and why it presents an attractive advertising opportunity for brands. We'll begin by exploring the key drivers and barriers affecting esports audience growth. Finally, we'll detail the benefits of advertising to esports fans and outline the best practices for implementing a successful esports ad campaign.

The companies mentioned in this report are: Alibaba, Arby's, Audi, Bud Light, Hyundai, Intel, Mastercard, McDonald's, Red Bull, Skillz, and Turner.

Here are some of the key takeaways from the report:

  • The number of esports fans globally is anticipated to climb 59% over the next five years, but there’s still significant room for growth.
  • This expansion will be driven by many factors, including investment from traditional sports leagues, a higher number of broadcast deals, and the expansion of the mobile-based esports scene.
  • The majority of esports fans are millennials, while data suggests that Gen Zers are more receptive to nontraditional sports, like esports, than traditional sports.
  • Brands can sponsor esports leagues, competitions, and players as well as advertise on digital platforms like Twitch to reach the eyeballs of esports fans.
  • Whatever shape a brand's esports ad campaign eventually takes, displaying an authentic commitment to the gaming world is paramount.

 In full, the report:

  • Outlines the drivers and potential barriers to esports audience growth.
  • Details the various reasons esports fans are a compelling advertising opportunity for brands.
  • Discusses the different ways brands can invest spend to reach the eyeballs of esports fans.
  • Explains best practices brands advertising to esports fans should adopt in order to make inroads with the gaming community. 

 

SEE ALSO: The eSports competitive video gaming market continues to grow revenues & attract investors

Join the conversation about this story »

10 things you probably didn't know about 'The Princess Diaries'

$
0
0

the princess diaries

  •  During an interview on "Watch What Happens Live with Andy Cohen,"Hathaway confirmed there will be a third "Princess Diaries" film. 
  • The first two films were directed by Garry Marshall, who made a cameo in the film as did his daughter and grandchildren. 
  • You might be surprised to learn that Hathaway had plenty of creative input in the film and the broken hairbrush and pore strips can be credited to her.

Anne Hathaway is a queen of the people and giving her subjects exactly what they want: A third installment of "The Princess Diaries." Hathaway finally confirmed that the rumors were true and Queen Mia Thermopolis is officially returning to the big screen.

So far, we don't have many details on what fans can expect from the new film, but one thing is for sure, Julia Andrews is coming back.

While we collectively wait for a release date and confirmation of Chris Pine's return, relive the magic of the royal film with 10 things you didn't know about "The Princess Diaries" first two films.

Several big-name actors had small roles in the film.

2001 was nearly two decades ago and, if you haven't watched the OG "Princess Diaries" film since then, you've probably forgotten that both Mandy Moore and Sandra Oh were featured in the film. Moore, who is a lead character on the award-winning show "This Is Us," played mean girl Lana Thomas, and Golden Globe winner Sandra Oh played Vice Principal Gupta.



Fat Louie was more than just a Hollywood trained cat.

Fat Louie, aka the unrecognized star of the films, wasn't just a well-trained Hollywood actor — he was also Anne Hathaway's in real life pet. Or, at least one of the four cats that played the character was owned by Hathaway. Fun fact, Fat Louie even has an IMDB page.



"The Princess Diaries" was Hathaway's first film.

Although Hathaway had previously appeared in the TV series "Get Real," the Meg Cabot book-turned-movie was Hathaway's first Hollywood film.

She told Glamour magazine in 2013 that her starring role as a princess in this hit film caused her to be labeled as a "good girl" in the industry, a label she spent years trying to break free of.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Pelosi invites Trump to give State of the Union address on February 5 after cancelling original date

$
0
0

UNITED STATES - JANUARY 17: Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., holds her weekly on camera press conference in the Capitol on Thursday, Jan. 17, 2019.(Photo By Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call)

  • House Speaker Nancy Pelosi invited President Donald Trump to deliver the State of the Union address on February 5.
  • Pelosi noted that Trump agreed to the new date in a conversation between the two on Monday.
  • The annual address to a joint session of Congress had initially been canceled, with Pelosi citing the government shutdown.

WASHINGTON — House Speaker Nancy Pelosi invited President Donald Trump to deliver his State of the Union address, rescheduling the date of what became a political football during the record-long partial government shutdown in January.

In a letter on Monday, Pelosi formally invited Trump to deliver the annual address to a join session of Congress on February 5. The letter also noted that Pelosi spoke with Trump on Monday and that he agreed to the set date next month.

Read more: Trump signs bill to reopen government for 3 weeks, ending record 35-day shutdown

The State of the Union had initially been postponed by Pelosi. The original date was supposed to be January 29, but Pelosi informed Trump the two would have to renegotiate until the shutdown ended or he could instead submit it in writing.

Pelosi also declined the White House the opportunity to conduct a walkthrough of the House chamber in preparation for the event when Trump made clear he intended to deliver the address as planned.

In what was largely viewed as a retaliation to Pelosi, Trump canceled a bipartisan congressional delegation to Afghanistan. The episode sent Capitol Hill into chaos, setting off angry responses from across the political spectrum. Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham even characterized Trump's cancelation of the trip as a "sophomoric response."

When Trump and congressional leaders reached a deal to reopen the government with a short-term continuing resolution on Friday, Pelosi reiterated that the January 29 date for the State of the Union was off the schedule and new date would need to be agreed upon.

Submitting the State of the Union in writing was customary until President Woodrow Wilson did so in 1913. Until then, the last president to deliver it in person was John Adams, the United States' second commander-in-chief.

SEE ALSO: The complete history of the US State of the Union address

SEE ALSO: 'It's a sign somebody cares': Federal workers in Washington line up around the block for a free meal as shutdown extends to day 35

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: MSNBC host Chris Hayes thinks President Trump's stance on China is 'not at all crazy'

Starbucks' former CEO Howard Schultz has been battling Trump for years. Now, he is considering running for president. (SBUX)

$
0
0

howard schultz starbucks

President Donald Trump slammed former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz on Twitter on Monday morning. 

"Howard Schultz doesn't have the 'guts' to run for President!" Trump tweeted. "Watched him on @60Minutes last night and I agree with him that he is not the 'smartest person.'"

Read more:Trump slams Howard Schultz after the ex-Starbucks CEO announces he's considering running for president

The attack came after Schultz announced he was "seriously considering running for president as a centrist independent."

"Not only the fact that this president is not qualified to be the president, but the fact that both parties are consistently not doing what's necessary on behalf of the American people and are engaged every single day in revenge politics," Schultz said in an interview with "60 Minutes" on Sunday.  

The battle of the wealthy businessmen has been a long time coming.

Trump bashed Starbucks on the campaign trail in 2015. And, Schultz has criticized Trump's politics for years. 

Here's a look at how the feud between the two men has evolved as Starbucks has become the focus of a culture war in Trump's America:

SEE ALSO: Democrats are begging Howard Schultz not to run for office — and threatening a Starbucks boycott if he does

Trump first took on Starbucks as a political foe in 2015, while campaigning in the 2016 presidential race.

The then-presidential hopeful brought up the topic of the chain's decision to release simple, red holiday cups for the 2015 holiday season during a pre-debate rally in Springfield, Illinois.

"No more 'Merry Christmas' at Starbucks," Trump said to a crowd of about 10,200, reports the Washington Post."Maybe we should boycott Starbucks. I don't know. Seriously. I don't care."

Trump also said that he might terminate Starbucks' lease in Trump Tower over the red cups. More than three years later, the location remains open

Read more:Trump suggests boycotting Starbucks' plain red holiday cups



Trump's critics called for Starbucks to end its Trump Tower lease.

In 2016, Starbucks supporters attempted to take matters into their own hands, asking the company to terminate its lease. Hundreds of people pledged to buy more than $40,000 in Starbucks gift cards if the company terminated its lease.

"The money Starbucks gives Trump every month is used to fund the bigotry and racism that he broadcasts across the country," the pledge read. "Macy's, NBC-Universal, ESPN, Apple, and NASCAR have all cut ties with Trump, but Starbucks continues to hold out, forcing us to unwillingly fund Donald Trump's hate with every latte bought."

Read more:Starbucks customers have pledged to buy $40,000 in gift cards if the coffee giant ditches Donald Trump



Schultz endorsed Hillary Clinton for president in the 2016 presidential race, slamming Trump.

In September 2016, Schultz endorsed Clinton, the first time he publicly came out in support of a presidential candidate. 

"I think it's obvious that Hillary Clinton needs to be the next president," Schultz told CNN's Poppy Harlow. "On the other side, we've seen such vitriolic display of bigotry and hate and divisiveness, and that is not the leadership we need for the future of the country."

Read more:Starbucks CEO endorses Hillary Clinton



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

The NBA's recent history of trading superstars is a bad omen for the Pelicans

$
0
0

anthony davis 1

  • Anthony Davis is the latest NBA superstar to request a trade in advance of his free agency.
  • In recent years, teams dealing superstars have not always fared well on the trade market, with deals that either focused on getting back proven players over future assets, or deals that didn't land the team any top-tier talent.
  • The Pelicans will likely try to get players who can help now and future assets, but recent history suggests that it will be hard to do.

Anthony Davis' trade request from the New Orleans Pelicans is the latest example of what's become known as "pre-agency" in the NBA.

Star players have exerted their power in the NBA by demanding trades from their teams with their free agency on the horizon. The idea is that, if they're unhappy, they can force their teams to move them before they leave for nothing in free agency.

It also allows them some control over where they land. Opposing teams won't give up much in value if they don't feel they can re-sign those stars. Players will send out signals about which teams they will or will not re-sign with to land in more preferable destinations.

Read more: Anthony Davis' trade demand sets up an high-stakes showdown over the next 10 days

We've seen this happen with numerous players in recent years — Jimmy Butler (twice), Paul George, Kyrie Irving, and Kawhi Leonard. DeMarcus Cousins was traded by the Sacramento Kings before they had to decide on him.

The situations weren't all congruent, but across all of them, there has been one consistent factor — middling returns.

Trades can take years to play out and be properly analyzed. But over the last two seasons, nearly all of the deals that involved superstar players trading teams resulted in average to underwhelming returns thus far. Here's a look:

  • 2/20/17 — DeMarcus Cousins and Omri Casspi traded to the New Orleans Pelicans for Buddy Hield, Tyreke Evans, Langston Galloway, 2017 first-round pick (No. 10, became Zach Collins), and 2017 second-round pick (No. 34, became Frank Mason)
  • 6/22/17 — Jimmy Butler traded to the Minnesota Timberwolves for Zach LaVine, Kris Dunn, and No. 7 pick (became Lauri Markkanen)
  • 6/30/17 — Paul George traded to the Oklahoma City Thunder for Victor Oladipo and Domantas Sabonis
  • 8/30/17 — Kyrie Irving traded to the Boston Celtics for Isaiah Thomas, Jae Crowder, Ante Zizic, 2018 first-round pick (No. 8, became Collin Sexton), and 2020 second-round pick
  • 7/18/18 — Kawhi Leonard and Danny Green traded to the Toronto Raptors for DeMar DeRozan, Jakob Poeltl, top-20 protected 2019 first-round pick
  • 11/12/18 — Butler and Justin Patton traded to the Philadelphia 76ers for Robert Covington, Dario Saric, Jerryd Bayless, and 2022 second-round pick

kyrie irvingThat's a lot to unpack. None of those trades could be considered disasters except for the Cavs' trade of Irving, which went sour because Thomas was hurt, ineffective, later traded, and the pick landed lower than most expected.

In the other trades, the team dealing the star player got back at least one solid player, which is fine. The Kings basically turned Cousins into Hield, Harry Giles, and Justin Jackson; Hield is already positively affecting winning this season.

Markkanen is already a centerpiece for the Bulls, and they paid LaVine like one.

The Spurs and Wolves both opted to try and stay competitive by getting ready-to-play players over assets. It has worked in the Spurs' case.

So yes, teams have gotten some pieces, but not massive returns. For how hard it is to land a true star in the NBA, none of those returns have drastically changed a team's outlook. The Spurs are still competitive, but will face more obstacles in maintaining their competitiveness in the future or veering toward a full rebuild. The Wolves got solid contributors back, but nobody who appears to be a true building block. Markannen looks like a nice player, but it's unclear if he's a true star to build around.

The only trade that's turned into a win-win for both teams is the Pacers-Thunder trade for Paul George. Nobody expected Oladipo and Sabonis to turn into the players they are today, and many analysts crushed the Pacers for not getting draft picks in return. The Pacers got a little lucky — how many "second draft" players like Oladipo suddenly realize their potential after being traded twice and turn into actual stars? It's a small list. Their return would be even more positive if they managed to get a draft pick back from the Thunder.

Two things are working in the Pelicans favor — Davis won't be a free agent until 2020, so teams trading for him have more time with him. That should increase the quality of offers. Davis is also a better player than any of the names above.

The Pelicans will presumably look for players who can help them right away, plus assets in young players and picks for Davis. That's pretty standard in superstar trades, but the Pelicans, already in a small market where they struggle to maintain relevancy, likely aren't eager to start a full-scale rebuild around project players and loads of picks.

There's no pleasant route the Pelicans can take. If they trade Davis before the trade deadline (February 7) this year, they'll never get to hear the Boston Celtics' offer (due to contract complications, the Celtics can't trade for Davis this season) or know for sure if they'll be getting the No. 1 pick in 2019 back.

If they hold onto Davis, they risk seeing worse offers (as Davis will be closer to free agency), plus dealing with locker room turmoil with a player who wants out.

Such is life in the NBA with superstars, and once Davis is moved, the clock will reset until a new big-name superstar approaches free agency.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: What will happen when Earth's north and south poles flip

Live TV musicals like 'Rent' are missing the mark. Here are 2 things they're consistently getting wrong.

$
0
0

rent musical fox

  • "Rent: Live" aired on Monday.
  • The show, which was supposed to air entirely live, seems to be hard to review because most of the telecast was previously recorded due to its star Brennin Hunt breaking his foot. The actor, who played Roger, suffered the injury during a dress rehearsal the night before the live show.
  • Had the production taken a note from the world of theater and cast understudies the show could have aired live as planned instead of airing recorded rehearsal footage the world wasn't supposed to see.
  • "Rent: Live" also fell victim to a problem that plagues most of the recent live TV musicals: poor sound mixing.

 

Between NBC's "The Sound of Music Live!" and Monday's "Rent: Live" on Fox, live TV musicals have made great strides since 2013.

Leading actor choices keep getting better, and the set designs have gone from basic to brilliant. With 2016's "Grease: Live," live audiences were finally incorporated to mimic the energy of live theater.

But, TV hasn't fixed everything.

The networks need to take a few more pages from live theater's book.

Understudies aren't a cop-out. They're the lifeblood of the theater.

Fox's "Rent: Live" aired with mostly previously recorded footage from a dress rehearsal because the actor who played Roger, Brennin Hunt, had broken his foot and was unable to perform.

rent fox musical

Most headlines of the announcement joked about "the show must go on" quality of it all. Yet, technically, the show didn't truly go on. Fox opted out of airing most of the show live and only switched gears for the final 10 or 15 minutes. While viewers at home watched the previously recorded footage, the in-studio audience saw a staged reading of the musical that featured Hunt in a cast and wheelchair.

Read more: Fox's 'Rent' was the lowest-rated live TV musical ever

Unlike most professional theater productions, Fox didn't cast any understudies for its leads.

Live theater is thrilling because anything can happen, including the bad, so productions have always been smart to have a fail-safe in understudies.

Understudies are actors who learn another actor's role in order to be able to replace them whenever needed.

Were this not "Rent: Live" and instead a revival of "Rent" on Broadway, an understudy for Hunt would have gone on without a beat. The show would be performed as intended with its proper choreography and energy.

Audiences may sigh when a big name misses a show, but theater standards are high and understudies are just as equally talented as the lead cast. They have to be in order to keep an entire role memorized while also performing ensemble duties or other tasks.

Understudies keep shows going. After all, some of Broadway's biggest names got their starts as understudies. When Ethel Merman couldn't perform, Elaine Stritch stepped up. Not too shabby.

There needs to be a better audio balance between the actors, the band, and the audience.

Even though "Rent: Live" aired previously recorded footage, it still suffered the same problem many of the recent telecasts faced: sound mixing.

Sound mixing is the complex art of tweaking audio levels to make all the different sources of sound feel seamless and cohesive.

rent fox vanessa hudgens

When it comes to the live TV musicals, striking a balance between the actors, the band, and the audience is crucial. And it's something even the best telecasts — looking at you, "Jesus Christ Superstar Live in Concert"— struggle with. Sometimes the music overpowers the singing, but more often than not, the audience overpowers the singing. 

Live theater necessitates a live audience. It's one of the biggest reasons, among many others, "The Sound of Music Live!" and "Peter Pan Live!" fell so flat. It's part of the energy and the experience.

But it's off-putting that during "What You Own" in "Rent: Live," the audience screamed so loudly as Brennin Hunt's Roger and Jordan Fisher's Mark performed that the lyrics were inaudible several times.

The same happened during "Jesus Christ Superstar Live" when Brandon Victor Dixon performs "Heaven on Their Minds" and Norm Lewis begins his beautiful baritone in "This Jesus Must Die." (The woos are even included in the album.)

Live TV musicals don't need just any audience. They need a theater audience. Broadway icon Laura Benanti said,"A theater audience would have made ['Rent: Live'] perfect."

How is this different?

It's called theater etiquette. At the appropriate times, you laugh, you clap, you cheer, but more than anything you respect the people up on stage.

It's an unspoken rule, but it's one all good theatergoers abide by, and it's one they need to instill in the live TV musicals studio audience.

Visit INSIDER's homepage for more.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This tiny building in Wilmington, Delaware is home to 300,000 businesses

3 great TV shows to watch on Netflix this week

$
0
0

Ted and Alexis on Schitt's Creek season four Pop TV

Don't let the gigantic Netflix catalog overwhelm you with choices this week. INSIDER is here to once again recommend the best TV shows on the streaming service you can watch this week. 

First up, we turn to the infamous serial killer everyone is talking about this week thanks to a new fictional movie starring Zac Efron as Ted Bundy. 

"Conversations With a Killer: The Ted Bundy Tapes"

Conversations with a Killer The Ted Bundy Tapes S01E01 Netflix

Seasons: 1

Episodes: 4

"Conversations with a Killer" is a four-part documentary series about Ted Bundy, a man convicted in the 1970s of one kidnapping and three murders. Before his death, Bundy is said to have confessed to killing more than 30 women. The Netflix documentary gives an overview of his life, arrest, and death using "present-day interviews, archival footage, and audio recordings made on death row."

If you're a true-crime fan, you won't want to miss this miniseries. 

Read more:How Ted Bundy got away with so many murders, according to a forensic psychologist

"Schitt's Creek"

schitts creek

Seasons: 4

Episodes: 51

"Schitt's Creek" is a Canadian CBC-original series which airs on PopTV in the US, but has found a larger devoted fan base thanks to the first four seasons streaming on Netflix. The comedy series, created by father-son duo Eugene and Dan Levy, tells the story of a once-wealthy family reduced to living in a town (called Schitt's Creek) that they once purchased as a practical joke.

Dan Levy serves as the showrunner of the series, and has cultivated one of the best comedies on television right now thanks to the smart writing and impeccable character development. The small-town comedy shtick gives way to fantastic character development and heart-melting romantic subplots by the third and fourth seasons. 

"Jeopardy!"

Alex Trebek Jeopardy

Seasons: 2

Episodes: 35

In a brilliant (if unexpected) move, Netflix has syndicated two "Jeopardy!" tournaments for your streaming pleasure. The Tournament of Champions and Battle of the Decades episodes showcase some of the most brilliant minds to ever appear on the trivia show, and you'll find yourself sucked into the fast-paced format and unique personalities of the contestants. 

Read more:These are the hardest 'Jeopardy!' questions that stumped even the contestants — can you get them right?

Whether you're an existing "Jeopardy!" fan or have never tuned into the show before, the episodes streaming on Netflix are a perfect 20-minute dose of TV for when you're not sure what else to watch. 

Visit INSIDER's homepage for more.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 7 science-backed ways to a happier and healthier 2019 that you can do the first week of the new year

THE US TELEHEALTH MARKET: The market, drivers, threats, and opportunities for incumbents and newcomers

$
0
0

bii us telehealth lumascape

This is a preview of a research report from Business insider Intelligence, Business Insider's premium research service. To learn more about Business Insider Intelligence, click here

Telehealth — the use of mobile technology to deliver health-related services, such as remote doctor consultations and patient monitoring — is enabling healthcare providers and payers to address the US healthcare industry’s growing list of problems.

The proliferation and rapid advancement of mobile technology are spurring telehealth adoption, and many believe that 2018 could be the tipping point for the telehealth market.

In this report, Business Insider Intelligence defines the opaque US telehealth market, forecasts the market growth potential and value, outlines the key drivers behind usage and adoption, and evaluates the opportunity telehealth solutions will afford all stakeholders. We also identify key barriers to continued telehealth adoption, and discuss how providers, payers, and telehealth companies are working to overcome these hurdles.

Here are some of the key takeaways:

  • Telehealth is enabling healthcare providers and payers to address the US healthcare industry’s growing list of problems, including rising healthcare costs, an aging population, and the transformation of healthcare from service-centric to consumer-centric, which is straining healthcare system resources and threatening to drive up payer costs.
  • Although telehealth solutions aren't suitable for all patients, right now, about 45% of the US population, or 147 million consumers, falls within the addressable market.
  • Despite low usage rates, most consumers are open to using telehealth solutions, according to the 2018 Business Insider Intelligence Insurance Technology Study. 
  • A range of companies are well-positioned to generate savings in terms of revenue and avoid potential pitfalls by deploying telehealth solutions.

 In full, the report:

  • Offers an overview of different types of telehealth services and their applications in the US healthcare ecosystem. 
  • Highlights the growth drivers and opportunities of these applications.
  • Includes exclusive data and insights from the 2018 Business Insider Intelligence Insurance Technology Study. 
  • Provides examples of key players in the telehealth market, including insurers, medical device makers, and health networks. 
  • Gives recommendations on how health networks and payers should approach using and deploying telehealth solutions.

Subscribe to an All-Access pass to Business Insider Intelligence and gain immediate access to:

This report and more than 250 other expertly researched reports
Access to all future reports and daily newsletters
Forecasts of new and emerging technologies in your industry
And more!
Learn More

Purchase & download the full report from our research store

Join the conversation about this story »

Acting attorney general Matt Whitaker says he thinks the Mueller probe is 'close to being completed'

$
0
0

Robert Mueller

  • Acting attorney general Matthew Whitaker said he thinks the Russia investigation is "close to being completed."
  • The FBI has been investigating Russia's interference into the 2016 election since 2016.
  • Several associates of President Donald Trump have been charged by the special counsel Robert Mueller, and many are cooperating with prosecutors, including the former national security adviser, Trump's former lawyer, the former deputy campaign chairman, and the former campaign chairman.
  • Trump is a figure of interest in multiple threads of the Russia investigation. He was also an unindicted co-conspirator in a separate criminal case brought against Michael Cohen by the Manhattan US attorney's office.
  • Justice Department veterans say that even if prosecutors have enough evidence to indict Trump, they would refrain from doing so because current department guidelines say a sitting president cannot be charged with a crime.

Matthew Whitaker, the acting attorney general, said Monday that the special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election is "close to being completed."

"Right now the investigation is, I think, close to being completed, Whitaker said. "And, I hope that we can get the report from Director Mueller as soon as possible."

Whitaker made the statement during a news conference at which the Justice Department announced it was formally charging the Chinese telecom company Huawei and its CFO with helping banks sidestep sanctions on Iran and for stealing trade secrets.

The FBI has been investigating Russia's interference in the election since the summer of 2016. As part of the investigation, Mueller is also looking into whether members of President Donald Trump's campaign secretly worked with Moscow to tilt the election in his favor, and whether Trump sought to obstruct justice when he fired FBI director James Comey in 2017.

Last week, prosecutors charged the longtime GOP strategist Roger Stone with obstruction, false statements, and witness tampering. Legal scholars say more indictments against Stone's associates will likely be handed down in the coming weeks as well.

Several other Trump associates have also been charged, including former national security adviser Michael Flynn, former campaign chairman Paul Manafort, former deputy campaign chairman Rick Gates, and former campaign aide George Papadopoulos. Dozens of Russian nationals and several Russian entities have also been charged as part of the probe.

Trump is a figure of interest in many threads of the investigation, including Comey's firing and other reported efforts to hamper the investigation; the Trump Organization's efforts to build a Trump Tower in Moscow; Russia's hack of the Democratic National Committee; WikiLeaks' subsequent dissemination of stolen emails; a meeting between top campaign officials and Russians at Trump Tower in June 2016; and more.

He was also named as an unindicted co-conspirator in a separate criminal case against his former lawyer, Michael Cohen, brought by the US attorney's office in Manhattan.

Justice Department veterans say that even if prosecutors have evidence showing that Trump engaged in criminal conduct, it's unlikely he would be indicted because current Justice Department guidelines say a sitting president cannot be charged. 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: MSNBC host Chris Hayes thinks President Trump's stance on China is 'not at all crazy'

Viewing all 76301 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>