Quantcast
Channel: Business Insider
Viewing all 76301 articles
Browse latest View live

Traditional TV usage is declining across every demographic — here's how digital media companies are recreating content bundles

$
0
0

This is a preview of a research report from Business Insider Intelligence. Current subscribers can read the report here.

tv usage decline

As streaming becomes an increasingly mainstream behavior among consumers, the video industry has produced new combinations of streaming video programming services to prepare for the progressive overhaul in how media is distributed.

These streaming bundles have emerged in response to the problems of media fragmentation, cord-cutting, and high consumer costs. Declining usage of traditional TV across every demographic, particularly among young viewers, has also demanded new solutions to the traditional distribution model that is pay-TV.

Although streaming media bundles are still evolving, four distinct models have emerged:

  • Skinny bundles — Cheaper, streaming versions of the traditional pay-TV bundle, but with fewer channels.
  • SVOD aggregators — Facilitate a la carte sign-ups to third-party streaming services through a central user portal. The primary example so far is Amazon Channels, Amazon's SVOD partner program. 
  • SVOD integrations — SVOD services like Netflix that bring their offerings to a traditional operator's service.
  • Streaming service partnerships — Combine one or more streaming services under a single offering, at a lower cost than the total price separately.

In the SVOD Bundling Report, Business Insider Intelligence examines the state of the US video ecosystem and how media companies are refining their distribution strategies to meet the changing needs of consumers. The report situates each of the four bundle model types within the overall SVOD market, and investigates the overarching advantages and challenges each faces. Finally, we predict how player dynamics might transform and adapt, outlining best practices for providers to succeed within the new TV landscape.

Here are some of the key takeaways from the report:

  • SVOD bundles partake in a growing SVOD market in the US. Business Insider Intelligence estimates that the SVOD market totals $13.6 billion in 2018, primarily driven by uptake on services from SVOD giants Netflix, Hulu, and Amazon Prime Video. 
  • Streaming video accessed on over-the-top (OTT) platforms is going mainstream, while consumers — particularly younger viewers — are reducing usage on live, linear TV. Traditional TV usage among viewers ages 18-24 has dropped 48% since 2011, 35% among 25-34 year olds, and 18% in the 35-49 demographic. 
  • Skinny bundle services are growing in popularity, with 7.2 million subscribers in the US, but they suffer fundamental financial sustainability problems. 
  • Distributors with at-scale platforms and powerful back-end tech can capitalize on the growing consumer demand for content consolidation among consumers. Faced with a fragmented and expanding universe of content options, more than two-thirds of consumers say they would prefer to get all their services from a single source, per Hub Entertainment Research. 
  • Winners in the bundling shakeout will have prioritized internet-connected tech, an effective user experience, reasonable pricing, and content diversity. 

In full, the report:

  • Identifies the four SVOD model types that have emerged as alternatives or supplements to traditional distribution.
  • Investigates the top advantages and challenges of each model type.
  • Outlines strategies that players across media and distribution companies can use to address business or market challenges.
  • Explores how the dynamics of each model type will evolve as services converge under new bundled offerings.

 

Join the conversation about this story »


AI IN BANKING AND PAYMENTS: How artificial intelligence can cut costs, build loyalty, and enhance security across financial services

$
0
0

maturity of AI solutions

This is a preview of a research report from Business Insider Intelligence, Business Insider's premium research service. To learn more about Business Insider Intelligence, click here

Artificial intelligence (AI) is one of the most commonly referenced terms by financial institutions (FIs) and payments firms when describing their vision for the future of financial services. 

AI can be applied in almost every area of financial services, but the combination of its potential and complexity has made AI a buzzword, and led to its inclusion in many descriptions of new software, solutions, and systems.

This report from Business Insider Intelligence, Business Insider's premium research service, cuts through the hype to offer an overview of different types of AI, and where they have potential applications within banking and payments. It also emphasizes which applications are most mature, provides recommendations of how FIs should approach using the technology, and offers examples of where FIs and payments firms are already leveraging AI. The report draws on executive interviews Business Insider Intelligence conducted with leading financial services providers, such as Bank of America, Capital One, and Mastercard, as well as top AI vendors like Feedzai, Expert System, and Kasisto.

Here are some of the key takeaways:

  • AI, or technologies that simulate human intelligence, is a trending topic in banking and payments circles. It comes in many different forms, and is lauded by many CEOs, CTOs, and strategy teams as their saving grace in a rapidly changing financial ecosystem.
  • Banks are using AI on the front end to secure customer identities, mimic bank employees, deepen digital interactions, and engage customers across channels.
  • Banks are also using AI on the back end to aid employees, automate processes, and preempt problems.
  • In payments, AI is being used in fraud prevention and detection, anti-money laundering (AML), and to grow conversational payments volume.

 In full, the report:

  • Offers an overview of different types of AI and their applications in payments and banking. 
  • Highlights which of these applications are most mature.
  • Offers examples where FIs and payments firms are already using the technology. 
  • Provides descriptions of vendors of different AI-based solutions that FIs may want to consider using.
  • Gives recommendations of how FIs and payments firms should approach using the technology.

Subscribe to an All-Access membership to Business Insider Intelligence and gain immediate access to:

This report and more than 250 other expertly researched reports
Access to all future reports and daily newsletters
Forecasts of new and emerging technologies in your industry
And more!
Learn More

Purchase & download the full report from our research store

Join the conversation about this story »

Lawyer signals that the legal battle with the US over the fate of the Huawei CFO will be a political one

$
0
0

huawei we love you

  • A lawyer for Sabrina Meng Wanzhou, daughter of Huawei's founder and the company's CFO, just spoke to the press about her defense.
  • Huawei's CFO Sabrina Meng Wanzhou was detained and arrested in Canada on behalf of the US, where she is awaiting extradition. 
  • Meng and her father's company have been accused of bank fraud and violating US sanctions against Iran. 
  • From the moment Meng was arrested, China has made its fury plain, outright accusing Canada and the US of political scheming against Huawei and China.
  • This is the first time her legal defense has hinted at taking advantage of the grim, high-stakes political pall hanging over the case.

A lawyer for Sabrina Meng Wanzhou, daughter of one of China's richest men and CFO of Huawei the telecom company her dad founded, just hinted at her defense strategy. And the Trump administration may be in for a long, difficult, and highly politicized court battle to secure her extradition from Canada. 

Richard Peck, the lead counsel for Meng told Canada's Globe and Mail newspaper on Monday that the case was "remarkably" political.

By speaking to the media, Meng's lawyers have sent the first signals that this is a case that will be played out in public headlines and in political arenas, just as it will in the courts. 

Meng's case has been a lightning rod for the evolving tensions, not only between the US and China on trade, but for Canada, who is caught between two increasingly antagonistic superpowers.  

Since Meng’s arrest, two high-profile Canadians have been detained in China. A third Canadian, has been re-tried in a Dalian court for drug smuggling, where the sentence was increased to death.

Following her arrest at the Vancouver airport in December, trilateral relations have been put to the test, Meng's lawyers may use the tightrope tension to their advantage.

"The political overlay of this case is remarkable," Peck told the Globe and Mail, referring to his client Meng.

"That’s probably the one thing that sets it apart from any other extradition case I’ve ever seen," he said. "It’s got this cloud of politicization hanging over it."

Why Meng's lawyers are calling the case politicized.

Writing in the Globe and Mail, Professor Wesley Wark at the University of Ottawa suggested that the US government "showed its hand" last week, in its indictments of criminal misconduct on the part of Huawei and its leadership. 

Among other charges, the Justice Department accused Meng and Huawei of sidestepping US sanctions on Iran by telling a global bank it had no relationship with Skycom, which the US said is controlled by Huawei. Skycom sold more than $100 million in banned technologies to Iran.

In another indictment filed in Seattle, Huawei was charged with wire fraud, stealing trade secrets, and obstructing justice. US prosecutors accused the company of stealing robotics technology from carrier T-Mobile.

"Like it or not, this legal conflict has become a high-stakes geopolitical battle for Canada, because of our arrest of executive Meng Wanzhou... Canada-Chinese relations have suffered greatly, and two Canadians have been arbitrarily detained in China in an exercise of 'hostage diplomacy,'" Wark wrote.

For his own part, in December, the President Donald Trump told Reuters he would gladly intervene in the Justice Department’s case against Meng if it would serve US national security interests or fast track a trade deal with China.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau fired his ambassador to China John McCallum last week for going off topic when speaking about the case and complaining that the request of the United States had put Canada in jeopardy.

McCallum told Chinese-language media last week that Meng had some "strong arguments" against extradition to the US and that Meng’s extradition "would not be a happy outcome."

Canadian Justice Minister David Lametti told Reuters his office would not guess at or question Meng's defense strategy.

"We are committed to a fair process unfolding before the courts and the steps undertaken by the Department of Justice Canada on this case have followed due process, in accordance with the Extradition Act, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and our Treaty with the United States," a spokeswoman for Canada’s Department of Justice told the newswire.

SEE ALSO: Canada fired its Chinese ambassador after his 'mind-boggling' remarks on the arrest of Huawei's CFO

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: China made an artificial star that's 6 times as hot as the sun, and it could be the future of energy

How consumers rank the top delivery services in the US — and how they stack up against the growing threat of Amazon (AMZN, FDX, USD)

$
0
0

The transportation and logistics industry is undergoing a massive shift as a result of surging deliveries. Daily parcel volumes are higher than ever before — but so are customers’ expectations for cheap and fast fulfillment. 

UPS Leads the Pack with the Best Tracking Features

To keep up with mounting demand, retailers and their logistics partners have been racing to develop more efficient processes with experimental supply chain models like crowdsourced delivery — the Uber model in which customers use mobile apps to connect directly with local couriers for on-demand or same-day fulfillment.

And it’s not just startups like Deliv and Postmates getting in on the action. This year Amazon not only launched its own shipping service to deliver packages for other businesses (“Shipping with Amazon”) but also announced its “Delivery Service Partner” program, which provides capital incentives for people to launch their own delivery companies fulfilling orders on behalf of Amazon itself.

With emerging delivery models like these aggressively stealing away customers, the pressure is on for legacy players like FedEx, UPS, the USPS, and the thousands of businesses who depend on them every day, to respond. But it will take more than just material resources or a large fleet of vehicles to truly compete. These companies need to earn the trust of consumers.

Business Insider Intelligence, Business Insider’s premium research service, has obtained exclusive survey data to paint the 2018 delivery landscape and the trends of its major players. The findings comprise the team’s latest Enterprise Edge Report, The 2018 Delivery Trust Report, and give transportation, supply chain, and logistics companies the tools they’ll need to win back customers.

Enterprise Edge Reports are the very best research Business Insider Intelligence has to offer in terms of actionable recommendations and proprietary data, and they are only available to Enterprise clients.

In full, the study:

  • Uses proprietary consumer survey data to evaluate how the largest delivery companies in the US stack up on customer service, package tracking, package protection, and timeliness of delivery.
  • Assesses how at risk these providers are to new challengers entering the space.
  • Shares strategies on how delivery companies can achieve feature parity and, ideally, differentiation, in customer experience.

So, which delivery features do consumers care about?

First and foremost, speed. It makes sense that consumers value fast delivery, but did you know just how many of them prioritize this feature? According to a recent survey from Dropoff, it’s 99%. And with millions of packages delivered nationwide every single day, that’s a lot customers with high expectations.

But customers don’t just want their packages delivered quickly; they want to follow the journey from store to doorstep. Another one of the most important offerings delivery companies boast is real-time tracking, with nearly 90% of consumers noting it in the Dropoff survey.

Amazon package

If they can get it right, tracking is a twofold advantage for delivery companies; it entices consumers who want to know when their packages are coming, and it appeals to merchant partners who might be willing to switch delivery service providers for the added visibility and customer benefit.

And the field is still wide open for companies to differentiate on this feature. Among those who had a package delivered from UPS, FedEx, USPS, or DHL in the last year, nearly 30% of Business Insider Intelligence survey respondents couldn't actually say which company offered the best tracking features. Whether it means using mobile apps, SMS texting, or chatbots to communicate with customers, there’s plenty of opportunity for logistics companies to hone and become known for this feature.

Want to learn more?

This is just a snapshot of the Business Insider Intelligence 2018 Delivery Trust Report, which compiles the complete survey findings to dive deeper into the opportunities delivery companies have to engage and delight customers.

The multi-part report also presents actionable insights that transportation and logistics companies can use to fight back against Amazon’s continuous push into deliveries.

 

Join the conversation about this story »

27 fast-food menu items from US chains that you find in Japan

$
0
0

McDonald's Japan

  • Domino's Japan offers pies you've never dreamed of, including a lasagna pizza.
  • McDonald's McCafe sells macarons and elegant little desserts.
  • Wendy's in Japan serves pasta and soup in bread bowls.
  • KFC Japan biscuits look like donuts.

While Japan has its own great fast-food options, American travelers may also come across US fast-food brands like Domino's, McDonald's, Wendy's, and more. But the menus may look different to a US tourist.

Not everything served at fast-food restaurants in Japan is as unique as those Burger King burgers with black bunsbut there's definitely a wide variety of things you probably won't see anywhere else.

Check out some of the best fast-food options from American brands below.

The McDonald's Filet-O-Shrimp is a must-try.

The patty consists of big, plump shrimp surrounded by crispy, deep-fried breading.



If you love teriyaki sauce on everything, try a Teriyaki McBurger or Chicken Teriyaki Filet at McDonald's.

The Teriyaki McBurger features a pork patty smothered in sauce — and the Chicken Teriyaki Filet features a crispy fried chicken filet treated the same way.



This Gran Garlic Pepper burger would be a hit anywhere, but you can only get it at McDonald's locations in Japan.

Local tastes can be different everywhere, but the Gran Garlic Pepper burger features a peppery garlic sauce that would satisfy nearly everyone.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Salma Hayek posted a photo showing off her gray hair, and said she is 'proud' of not dyeing it

$
0
0

salma hayek

  • Yesterday, Salma Hayek posted a photo on Instagram showing off streaks of her gray hair. 
  • She captioned it saying she was "proud" of her natural look, and celebrities like Lenny Kravitz and Jessica Simpson flooded her with praise.
  • The 52-year-old star revealed in a 2017 New York Times interview that she doesn't dye her hair anymore because she doesn't have the "patience."

Salma Hayek looks great for her age. Even better, the 52-year-old movie star keeps it real.

The Oscar-nominated actress posted an au naturel photo to Instagram that shows off her makeup-free face, and reveals streaks of gray hair. 

Here's a look: 

#proud of my white hair. Orgullosa de mis canas. #hair

A post shared by Salma Hayek Pinault (@salmahayek) on Feb 3, 2019 at 1:29pm PST on

Hayek captioned the photo "proud of my white hair."

Stars like Lenny Kravitz and Jessica Simpson rushed to compliment Hayek. Simpson called her a "gorgeous lady," and Kravitz wrote, "You are stunning."

Back in 2017, Hayek — who has her own cosmetics line called Nuance— shared her beauty and health rituals with The New York Times, and revealed that she no longer dyes her hair

#nature #naturaleza

A post shared by Salma Hayek Pinault (@salmahayek) on Dec 30, 2018 at 8:56am PST on

"One of the reasons I don't dye my hair is because I don't have the patience to sit through it," Hayek said. "I don't want to spend what's left of my youth pretending I'm younger and then not enjoying life."

Visit INSIDER's homepage for more.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: An exercise scientist reveals exactly how long you need to work out to get in great shape

25 indispensable desk accessories we use to stay focused and comfortable at work

$
0
0

The Insider Picks team writes about stuff we think you'll like. Business Insider has affiliate partnerships, so we get a share of the revenue from your purchase.

Desk products 4_3

  • Staying focused at work can help you work smarter, not harder.
  • The right tools can amplify your attention or decrease distractions like clutter while you work.
  • I polled my coworkers to see what tools they keep on their desks to help them stay focused and comfortable in the office, and produce better, faster work. 

The catch-22 of a communal office space lit by fluorescent light bulbs is that, in order to be your most productive, you first need to feel somewhat at home there. Stiff chairs, back pain, clutter — they’re all distractions that contribute to a longer and less enjoyable workday. Staying focused can help you work smarter, not harder, and hopefully compounds into a better position at work, greater job satisfaction, and shorter days. 

The Insider Picks team tests and reviews hundreds of products — many of which are geared towards comfort and productivity. Below, you’ll find the 25 products we personally trust to keep us focused, productive, and comfortable at our desks all day.

A subtle vertical phone charger

Anker PowerWave 7.5 Fast Wireless Charging Stand, available at Amazon, $49.99

I use Anker’s PowerWave wireless charger to charge my iPhone at my desk every day. It holds my phone up vertically, so I can see when notifications pop up even when it’s charging. It’s a great, subtle-looking charger and it doesn’t cost much, so it’s a great addition to any desk, provided your phone charges wirelessly (most of the new ones do). — Malarie Gokey, Insider Picks Buying Guides editor



A stainless steel travel mug

Hydro Flask 12 oz Double Wall Travel Coffee Mug, available at Amazon, $29.95

I often end up running around to unexpected meetings and chats in the morning, and sometimes I'm forced to leave my coffee behind — or I just don't have time to drink it immediately. This insulated mug keeps it hot for hours, so even if a meeting runs long or I get so focused on something that I forget to drink it, it always seems to stay nice and steamy. — Sally Kaplan, Insider Picks editor



A posture belt for back pain

BetterBack Support Posture Belt, available at Amazon, $49.99

I swear by the BetterBack for helping me to maintain good posture at my desk and relieving both upper and lower back pain throughout the day. I have a few slipped discs in my spine, so I deal with pretty chronic discomfort. This is the only tool (not counting stretching and acupuncture) that has ever helped mitigate my pain, which helps me focus on my work instead of on my back. You can read my full review of the BetterBack here if you're interested. — Sally Kaplan, Insider Picks editor



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

These are the top five trends shaping the future of digital health

$
0
0

Digital Health

The healthcare industry is in a state of disruption. Digital solutions are becoming a necessary part of the new global standard of care for patients and regulation is being fast-tracked to catch up to digital health innovation.

These rapid changes will have ripple effects across the entire healthcare system, impacting incumbents and new entrants alike.

Based on our ongoing analysis, understanding of industry trends, and conversations with industry executives, Business Insider Intelligence, Business Insider’s premium research service, has put together The Top Five Trends Shaping The Future of Digital Health.

To get your copy of this free report, click here.

Join the conversation about this story »


This Girl Scout changed the words to Cardi B's 'Money' to boost her cookie sales, and her video's gone viral

$
0
0

girl scout cookies

  • Girl ScoutKiki Paschall recreated Cardi B's"Money" music video, changing the words to up her cookie sales. 
  • The video has now gone viral, and Paschall has sold over 1,000 boxes of cookies. 
  • Paschall's "Money" rendition has even been approved by Cardi B herself.

One Girl Scout is thinking outside the box when it comes to cookie sales

Kiki Paschall, a 10-year-old Girl Scout from California, posted a video of herself surrounded by cookie boxes, rapping to Cardi B's hit single "Money." But Paschall changed the lyrics to promote her cookies and up sales — and it worked.

"Been in this game since 2014, selling them cookies is my thing," Kiki rapped in her video. "Buy Thin Mints or even s'mores. Please open up when I knock on your door. Woo!"

She even changed the chorus to: "I got girls in my troop, cookies to my roof. Money!"

Take a look at the full music video below:

After the Girl Scouts posted the video to its official Twitter page, Paschall received over a million views, allowing her to sell over 1,000 boxes of cookies. 

Read more:The best Girl Scout cookies, ranked

Paschall had the help of her mother Shania Accius in writing and shooting the sweet video. 

"She's so excited," Accius told "Good Morning America.""I don't have a regular 9-to-5 so I can't sell cookies in the office. I said, 'you love doing it anyway so let's just make a music video.'"

Paschall and Accius even got the seal of approval from Cardi B herself who retweeted the video, writing, "I want all the cookieshhh."

Now that Paschall has sold out of her cookies, she's reveling in her 15 minutes of fame. 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Earth's north magnetic pole is on the move — here's what will happen when our poles flip

Insiders reveal why Starbucks' former CEO Howard Schultz is willing to ruin his life to run for president (SBUX)

$
0
0

Howard Schultz Buttons

  • Starbucks' former CEO Howard Schultz has met waves of backlash since announcing he is "seriously considering" running for president as a centrist independent. 
  • Coming from humble beginnings and achieving revolutionary success at Starbucks, Schultz is driven by a conviction that he is called to save the world, people who have worked with him say. 
  • According to some who spent time with Schultz at Starbucks and during his disastrous tenure with the Seattle SuperSonics, this conviction can be dangerous and verge on arrogance. 
  • "He has convinced himself he is our savior," said a former Starbucks employee who worked closely with Schultz for almost a decade. "He wants to be our gentle, gentle savior," the person continued, adding that Schultz thinks "he knows best for all of us." 

For years, rumors of presidential ambitions have followed Howard Schultz. From Starbucks baristas gossiping on Reddit to his penchant for spearheading progressive social projects, the longtime Starbucks leader's interest in politics is well known.

But, one question remained: Why would Schultz — a billionaire beloved by most people within the Starbucks community — want to ruin his life by running for president?

After three decades of leadership at Starbucks, Schultz is in a position where he can make millions of dollars doing whatever he wants. In 2018, Schultz's salary was just $1 at Starbucks, but he received more than $30 million in bonuses, stock, and options. He could have continued to lead Starbucks' social efforts as chairman or invest more time into the Schultz Family Foundation, which works with underserved youth and veterans. 

Instead, he decided to announce he was "seriously considering" running for president as an independent centrist. 

At the best of times, a presidential campaign is expensive and exhausting, with candidates surrendering privacy and independence. But by running as an independent, Schultz provoked instant fury from progressives — typically his supporters — because of concerns he would draw more votes away from Democrats than Republicans, thereby helping reelect President Donald Trump. 

Read more: Democrats are begging Howard Schultz not to run for office — and threatening a Starbucks boycott if he does

Schultz said in an interview on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" last Wednesday that he did not anticipate the degree of backlash. Even without it, however, a presidential run would be a major departure from his cushy role as Starbucks' chairman. Why, then, did he make the very public announcement and media blitz? 

Through more than a dozen interviews, as well as from Schultz's own recollections in his newest book, a picture emerges of Schultz as someone who has worked to improve workers' lives, engaging with social issues out of a sense of duty and — at times — a hunch that doing so would be the right business decision. The belief that he has been tasked with improving the world has massively shaped his career, from success at Starbucks to failure with the Seattle SuperSonics. 

Business Insider granted anonymity to two former Starbucks corporate workers as well as nine in-store employees to allow them to speak frankly without fear of professional repercussions. From these interviews, as well as from those with three other people who have worked with or know Schultz, a common narrative emerged. 

While Schultz has fought against inequality, he has also repeatedly overestimated his abilities, something these people called a dangerous result of the cocoon of admiration he developed at Starbucks.

Schultz's humble beginnings 

Howard Schultz was born in 1953 and raised in a housing project in Brooklyn, New York. His new book, "From the Ground Up," makes it clear that he still carries the weight of several traumatic childhood events, including his grandmother's verbal abuse, constant calls from bill collectors, and his mother's severe depression.

Schultz's father, Fred Schultz, is described as an angry and unapproachable parent who struggled to pay the bills. In his book, Schultz recalls an incident in which his father beat him so violently in the shower that Schultz did not attend school for a few days. 

In "From the Ground Up," Schultz ties his father's shortcomings to trauma stemming from his service in World War II and from economic abandonment by his employer. Fred Schultz was fired from his job as a truck driver without workers' compensation, severance, or health insurance after he broke his hip and ankle on the job. 

"I never shook off the indelible image of my father immobile on the couch after he slipped on the ice, helpless and abandoned by the company he was working for when the accident occurred," Schultz wrote. "Workers deserved a different relationship to the companies they helped to build, one based on trust, mutual care, and honesty." 

Schultz seems to have spent years coming to terms with his childhood, drawing from it a conviction that he needed to create a company — or a country — where his father could have succeeded. He was a bit less forthcoming, however, about how his later wealth may have affected his perspective. 

"I must say that writing about my own experience with money as a wealthy adult is less comfortable for me than writing about life as a child with my struggling father," Schultz wrote. "But like my father, it's part of who I am." 

Starbucks' core of progressivism 

Howard Schultz

Schultz attended Northern Michigan University on an athletic scholarship, taking on a series of odd jobs after graduation.

When Schultz discovered Starbucks — then a coffee roaster — in the early '80s, he became obsessed with the idea of turning the chain into an Italian espresso bar with European drinks and a strong sense of community. In 1986, Schultz acquired Starbucks, setting out to transform the 17-store chain into an international phenomenon that would fundamentally change how America understood coffee. 

From the beginning of his time at Starbucks, Schultz faced skepticism. Why would Americans want the experience of an Italian coffee shop? Why did Starbucks need to provide health insurance for part-time employees when few other companies did? And, what the hell was a latté?

Schultz pushed for his vision. And, over and over again, his controversial decisions were successful, says the Harvard Business School professor Nancy Koehn, who has studied Starbucks since the mid-1990s and done extensive interviews with Schultz.

"From the beginning, almost from the get-go of when he owned the company, he said, 'We're going to provide health insurance, we're going to provide stock options, we're going to provide career paths into management,'" Koehn said. "That was heresy at the time." 

Schultz's sticking to his convictions paid off. In 1992, Starbucks went public with fewer than 200 stores and a $250 million valuation. Starbucks hit 1,000 stores in 1996; it reached 10,000 in 2005. At the end of 2018, Starbucks had 29,324 stores around the world and a market cap of $85.6 billion. 

'Uncle Howard' 

howard schultz

Starbucks' success and its investment in employees helped make Schultz a beloved figure at the company, from corporate staff members to in-store baristas.

Koehn recalls witnessing Schultz walking into a meeting of Starbucks employees and having the room "erupt like a rock concert." One barista who has worked at the chain for 20 years told Business Insider that she cried when Schultz left Starbucks in 2018. Numerous workers affectionately referred to him as "Uncle Howard," and Schultz himself wrote in "From the Ground Up" that he loved Starbucks "almost as much as my family." 

One former executive who worked at Starbucks under Schultz's leadership for more than a decade told Business Insider that the former CEO was widely respected, well-liked, and trusted within the company. Schultz was "willing to make difficult decisions."

Typically, his decisions were proved to be the right ones. 

"There's a saying at Starbucks: We're not in the coffee business serving people, we're in the people business serving coffee," a Starbucks in-store worker who has been at the chain for roughly 13 years said.

"That mind-set really speaks to me and is largely why I have so much pride in the company," she continued, adding: "The focus has always been on human connection, from the very beginning."

The dark side of Starbucks' Schultz worship

Schultz, however, was far from perfect. According to two former corporate Starbucks employees who worked with Schultz for years starting in the late 1990s, the flipside of Schultz's empathy and intelligence is his difficulty responding to criticism.

"He has a truly unfortunate resemblance to Trump in that he cannot brook any sort of defiance," said the former Starbucks corporate worker who worked closely with Schultz in the early 2000s. "He demands loyalty. And he demands that his way be the way."

Privately, Schultz would implode when faced with criticism or questions, the two corporate workers independently told Business Insider. 

Both said Schultz was obsessed with control. One former corporate worker recalled Schultz micromanaging details down to the colors that should be used in reports. Once, Schultz took vocal offense to a young employee wearing an Intelligentsia Coffee shirt in the Starbucks office, the executive said. Another time, Schultz refused to stand next to Seattle's mayor at an event because of a perceived slight against Starbucks related to a single store's lease, the other corporate worker said. 

Schultz's personal reputation is deeply important to him, both said, adding that he is extremely sensitive to any perceived threats to it. At the same time, Schultz was willing to take massive risks at Starbucks, even when cautioned against them. 

"His impatience will, at times, make him impetuous," the former longtime executive said. "He can just have such a desire to win."

"He's a competitor," the person added. "So his nature is to always be pushing very hard." 

Read more: Howard Schultz reveals how he decided to launch Starbucks' 'embarrassing' and 'tone-deaf' 'Race Together' campaign despite internal concerns

A representative for Schultz did not respond to Business Insider's request for comment on or provide confirmation of these specific incidents. Starbucks also did not respond to a request for comment. 

Despite the missteps, Starbucks insiders trusted Schultz because he had earned that trust, leading the company to enormous economic success while providing benefits. He demanded loyalty, and most Starbucks insiders were happy to pledge their allegiance to Schultz. 

Outside Starbucks was another story. 

Schultz versus skeptics 

schultz sonics

Schultz's highest-profile professional failure was in leading the acquisition of the Seattle SuperSonics with a group of investors in 2001. Schultz had recently stepped down as Starbucks' CEO, assuming the role of chairman, and he said he viewed coming on as the largest investor in the team as a "public trust. " 

It was a disaster that ended with Schultz selling the Sonics to a group of Oklahoma businessmen led by Clay Bennett in 2006 — and with the team leaving Seattle altogether in 2008. 

"People who recognized me would shout expletives, sometimes cursing me out in front of my kids," Schultz writes in "From the Ground Up.""Selling the Sonics as I did is one of the biggest regrets of my professional life." 

Many Seattleites, including those who worked for the Sonics, continue to blame Schultz's missteps for the loss of the team. Jeremy Repanich, who worked in guest relations at the time and wrote a definitive feature on the period for Deadspin in 2012, is one of them. 

"He got in the ring, he tried to do it, he got really frustrated, and then he took his ball and went home," Repanich told Business Insider. 

According to Repanich, the then-Starbucks chairman's romantic notions of acquiring the team failed to live up to the expectations of Schultz or of Sonics fans. The city of Seattle and Schultz were unable to reach a deal to share the costs of building the new arena Schultz believed to be necessary, something Repanich blames, in part, on Schultz's failure to build coalitions or invest in lobbying. Accustomed to his position as a respected No. 1 at Starbucks, Schultz alienated players like star Gary Payton, to the detriment of the team. 

"He just was horrified that he couldn't control [players] and make them be the kind of people he wanted them to be," the corporate staffer who worked with Schultz in the early 2000s said. 

Schultz's thriftiness also had bizarre consequences, such as when the billionaire reportedly gave front-office employees Starbucks gift cards for $3.50 as a holiday present, a total so small the cards had to be custom made. Far from living up to his "Uncle Howard" reputation, Schultz's gift led to Sonics fans and employees — many of whom were initially thrilled about Schultz's acquisition — resenting the billionaire, according to Repanich. 

At Starbucks, Schultz was a widely respected leader with a massive amount of control. His romantic notion of what a coffee chain could be helped him create a revolutionary multibillion-dollar business. His focus on profitability paid off, and employees reaped the rewards. His success convinced him that he could take on any challenge and prove critics wrong. 

"When you're at Starbucks ... and you're the visionary, you're afforded a level of legitimacy to the decisions you make," Repanich said.

At the Sonics, Schultz was one of many powerful people with different agendas, from players to politicians. His romanticism of what owning a sports team would be like blinded him to reality, leaving him unprepared. Focusing on financials paralyzed the team.

Eventually, Schultz squandered away any legitimacy he had, sources say. He is only beginning to make amends a decade later, with his first formal apology to Sonics fans appearing in "From the Ground Up." 

"His reputation is most important to him, he's super sensitive about it," the former Starbucks executive said. "And yet, he would do something like the Sonics sale — whether he knew if they would move it or not, that was a giant decision and a huge risk — and yet, it bothers him that people still hold that against him." 

Schultz's political awakening

Howard Schultz

Five years after Schultz sold the Sonics, he developed a new obsession: politics.

While recovering from a surgery to fix a hairline fracture in 2011, Schultz was drawn into the around-the-clock cable news coverage of the debt-ceiling crisis. Schultz was exasperated by politicians' inability to compromise for the good of American people who were set to lose benefits and paychecks with the government shutdown. 

Schultz began to speak out, both internally at Starbucks and to the country as a whole. In December 2012, Washington, DC, area baristas wrote "Come Together" on cups to encourage bipartisan action. In October 2013, Starbucks provided customers with a chance to sign a petition to reopen the government. 

Starbucks' and Schultz's political activity only escalated from there. 

In 2013, Starbucks lobbied on behalf of same-sex marriage in Washington State, with Schultz speaking out to support marriage equality at Starbucks' annual shareholders' meeting. In 2014, the company announced a commitment to hire 10,000 veterans and military spouses by 2018. In 2015, the year of the doomed "Race Together" campaign, Schultz wrote a New York Times op-ed celebrating bipartisan leadership, in which he said he wasn't running for office "despite the encouragement of others."

Howard Schultz Timeline

According to those who have observed and worked with him, Schultz's dedication to social and political change is motivated by the same thing that drove him to provide benefits for employees: a genuine sense of duty.

"There's this real calling within him to have an impact that's larger than delivering to the stakeholders and Starbucks in a traditional way," Koehn said. 

Mike Haynie, the executive director of Syracuse University's Institute for Veterans and Military Families, said he has been impressed by Schultz's commitment to taking time to understand the realities of veterans' lives and by what he has perceived as a lack of a hidden agenda.

"There is only a handful of folks on this level who are as committed to this population as Howard and Sheri," Haynie told Business Insider, referring to Schultz and his wife, who is president of the Schultz Family Foundation. 

Haynie is incentivized to speak positively of his years working with Schultz, as the foundation recently donated $7.5 million to fund veterans' education and career preparation programs. 

However, even Schultz's critics say that the former CEO's efforts are rooted in a genuine desire to improve the world. For example, Repanich said he believes that Schultz's decision to acquire the Sonics was driven by a "naive" and perhaps arrogant notion that he could save the team. 

"He has convinced himself he is our savior," the former Starbucks corporate employee said. "He wants to be our gentle, gentle savior, and he [thinks] he knows best for all of us." 

The Trump tipping point

melania trump campaign

Even before 2011, Schultz was personally intrigued by politics.

Since the early '90s, Schultz and his wife have donated $193,000 to Democratic candidates and organizations, according to Open Secrets. According to the former Starbucks staffer, Schultz is close to the Clintons and is connected to other Democratic players. He was reportedly set to be Hillary Clinton's pick for secretary of labor if she won the 2016 election. 

After Trump's win, Schultz told Starbucks workers he was "stunned." In January 2017, Starbucks announced it planned to hire 10,000 refugees worldwide in the next five years in response to Trump's attempt at barring refugees from entering the US. 

"The world is screwed up. People are unsettled,"Schultz said during a meeting with Starbucks staff in Seattle in February 2017."There is a tremendous amount of pressure and anxiety in America."

"We have a president that is creating episodic chaos every single day and that is no doubt affecting consumer behavior," Schultz said in a video of the meeting obtained by Business Insider.

Schultz is a man who, when he sees something he thinks is wrong, takes action — even if that means overstepping the boundaries of what a CEO is expected to do, sources say. With the lack of civility on the 2016 campaign trail and Trump's election, Schultz said he was convinced that something was rotten in American politics. And, as he had done many times before on a wealth of different issues, he decided he needed to take action. 

In late 2016, Schultz announced plans to step down as CEO. In July 2018, he left the company altogether. Finally, his political career was set to take off. 

Schultz 2020

Howard Schultz Buttons

So, why is Schultz considering running for president? 

Essentially, because he wants to save America. And, he has experienced enough success at Starbucks that he genuinely — and perhaps arrogantly — believes he can. 

"I don't think this is primarily about the gas tank of an unsheathed ego at all," Koehn said. "I think ... he is very frustrated by what's going on in the country and he wants to do something. Again, he's gone from Starbucks as the landscape to the American electoral landscape as a possibility."

"I believe he does it genuinely with good intention," the Starbucks staffer from the early 2000s said. "But the intention is around making himself the hero. Like, he does think he is the only one who could solve our problems."

Schultz faced massive backlash the week after he announced he was considering running, with people slamming everything from his economic policies to his disconnect from the average American. The vast majority of Democratic strategists say that Schultz's run will mostly serve to draw votes away from a Democratic nominee, ultimately helping reelect Trump. Repanich dismissed Schultz's "West Wing-y" fantasies as reminiscent of the big promises he made to the SuperSonics.

Even some of the most loyal Schultz fans are not convinced. Many current and former Starbucks in-store workers are coming out against Schultz's plans to run as a centrist, including those who previously respected and trusted the former CEO. 

"Before he announced considering a run, I had as high an opinion of him as one could have of a billionaire," said one Santa Cruz, California-based Starbucks employee who says he is now considering quitting the company.

"It felt as though he was running Starbucks in a somewhat unique way, what with all the benefits and programs the corporation offers its partners, and because of this I felt that he perhaps at least had a finger on the pulse of everyday Americans' needs," he continued. "However, my opinion has changed considerably." 

Read more: Some Starbucks baristas are begging their former CEO not to run for president

Schultz rarely acts rashly or airs grievances publicly. 

"Here's a guy who spent years carefully curating his reputation. It is deeply, deeply important to him — how he's viewed," the former executive said. "In the course of three days, four days ... he's effectively seen that reputation dinged in many, many ways, in ways that I don't think he could have anticipated." 

"It's not who he thinks he is," he continued. "So, there's part of him that's probably saying, 'You know, wow I really miscalculated for the environment somehow.' And there's part of him that's saying, 'The environment is miscalculating me ... and I'm not getting the credit I deserve.'"

Now, the question may be if Schultz will escape the hell of his own making. Schultz has said he will only run if he has  "the conviction and the courage to believe I can win." He has shown a willingness throughout his career to pivot when times get tough or — in a less charitable framing — to surrender when things do not go his way.

At the same time, he has also learned that ignoring critics can yield incredible results. 

"I think he's going to mistake stubbornness for commitment to a heroic cause," the former corporate staffer said. 

"The longer he's in this, the more he tarnishes his own legacy," she added. "This is a self-inflicted wound."

If you have a Howard Schultz story to share or a perspective on his potential presidential campaign, reach out to ktaylor@businessinsider.com. 

SEE ALSO: Some Starbucks baristas are freaking out that Howard Schultz's political aspirations will make their job even harder

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A fish in Japan just sold for a record $3 million — here's why bluefin tuna is so expensive

This man's family vanished in China's most oppressed region. Last month he saw his son for the first time in 2 years, in a Chinese propaganda video.

$
0
0

uighur xinjiang abdurahman and son

  • China is waging an unprecedented crackdown on the Uighurs, a majority-Muslim ethnic group in the western region of Xinjiang.
  • Authorities are suspected to have detained up to 2 million people in the region, and send their children to state-run orphanages.
  • Abdurahman Tohti, a 30-year-old Uighur man living in Turkey, hasn't heard from his wife and kids since they disappeared after a visit to Xinjiang in 2016.
  • Last month he saw a video of his four-year-old son, Abduleziz, in what appeared to be a video taken inside a state-run Chinese orphanage.
  • He has taken the unusual step of discussing his missing family with INSIDER because he's "ready for any consequences ... I lost everything."
  • China justifies the orphanages as a way to lift children from poverty and stop them becoming terrorists. Beijing argues that its treatment of Uighurs is an anti-extremism strategy.

Abdurahman Tohti hasn't seen or heard from his wife, his son, or his daughter for almost three years, for reasons entirely out of his control.

He and his family are Uighurs, the majority-Muslim ethnic minority based in Xinjiang, western China.

Authorities from Beijing, under the guise of counter-terrorism, have in recent years covered the entire region with facial recognition cameras and locked up to 2 million residents in prison-like camps.

Chinese authorities are reported to have physically tortured Uighurs, turned them into forced laborers, and compelled them to sing pro-Chinese songs in order to be fed. The region — known to Uighurs as East Turkestan — has been described as a "21st-century police state."

China has routinely denied inflicting physical or psychological damage on Uighurs in these camps. Instead it has referred to them as "re-education camps" or "free vocational training" that make life "colorful."

Tohti left his village of Besh Tugmen in Aksu prefecture, western Xinjiang, in March 2013 and settled in Istanbul, Turkey, that October after studying in Egypt for a few months.

xinjiang camp yingye'er

He married his wife, Peride Yasin, in Istanbul, Turkey, in February 2014. They had two children — a boy, Abduleziz,  and a girl, Nadire.

In August 2016, Yasin and the children traveled to Xinjiang to visit family. Tohti hasn't heard from any of them since.

He and his wife were meant to speak after she landed, but she mysteriously deleted him from WeChat — China's most popular messaging platform — almost immediately after she arrived in China, he told INSIDER.

INSIDER's conversation with Tohti was translated from the Uighur language to English by Alip Erkin, an Australia-based activist at Uyghur Bulletin. (Uyghur is an alternative spelling.)

Tohti later heard from people on the ground that his wife was arrested upon arrival, and sentenced to ten years in prison. He has never heard anything official about their fate, and said he is "completely in the dark."

Nadire, his youngest, was five months old.

abdurahman wife

Tohti still doesn't know his wife's charges, but thinks it could be to do with her spending time in Turkey, an act for which China has been known to punish Uighurs.

The Turkish government has long offered a space for Uighurs to seek refuge and stage protests against China. Beijing's response has been to threaten to tank economic relations between the two countries.

China's grip on Uighurs have worsened since Yasin disappeared, with authorities using increasingly flimsy reasons to lock the people up — including having a beard, wearing long skirts, or setting their clocks to two hours after Beijing time.

Read more:China is using flimsy excuses to lock up its Muslim minority on a huge scale — here are some of the bizarre reasons people are in jail

uighur protest turkey

A familiar sight

Since his family vanished, Tohti has been stuck in limbo in Istanbul, with no idea where his wife or children went.

His parents are still in Xinjiang, but they cut off contact to protect themselves from reprisal, telling him not to contact them, then changing their phone number.

Uighurs in Xinjiang are often punished for communicating with people in foreign countries.

Tohti also tried to call his parents-in-law in Xinjiang, but the only number he had for them was out of service.

Then about three weeks ago, while scrolling through Douyin — the Chinese version of popular video-sharing platform TikTok— he saw a familiar sight: Big, black eyes, and round, rosy cheeks.

It was his four-year-old son, Abduleziz.

In the video, Abduleziz can be found answering a series of questions posted by a man off-camera in Mandarin Chinese — What's your name? How old are you? What is the name of the fatherland? What is on the fatherland's flag? — and answering in a way that seems pre-rehearsed.

Abduleziz can be heard saying his own name around the 2-second mark.

The last time Abdurahman Tohti saw his son, he couldn't even speak Uighur yet — let alone Chinese, he told INSIDER.

Tohti and Erkin, the Uighur rights activist in Australia, both think the video was taken in a state orphanage.

"I wasn't expecting this," Tohti told INSIDER. "I was devastated seeing him being brainwashed in an orphanage."

It is difficult to know when or where exactly the video was recorded — the person who posted the video on Douyin, a Han Chinese man, simply identifies himself as "Person in Xinjiang."

He posts videos of himself with young Uighur children, with captions that suggest he is their schoolteacher.

But certain markers in the video of Abduleziz indicate that this was taken in a state-run orphanage, Erkin told INSIDER.

The formula of the rapid-fire questions — asked off-screen of a child's name and age, before moving onto questions about China — is similar to other videos that have emerged of what appeared to be orphanages.

Erkin added: "I would say [Abduleziz was in an] orphanage because he doesn't have both parents with him. Normal schools are only for those who have guardians."

As part of China's crackdown on Xinjiang it has sent Han Chinese people to the region to embed themselves into Uighurs' daily lives — even going as far as sending them to lodge in their homes.

abduleziz tohti

China has placed thousands of children in Xinjiang in de facto orphanages after detaining their parents, the Financial Times reported last year.

In such centers — sometimes referred to as "welfare centers" and "protection centers"— Uighur children are required to speak only in Mandarin, The Associated Press (AP) reported.

According to the AP, China denies the existence of the internment camps, and says the orphanages are to help disadvantaged children, and lift them out of poverty and away from extremism.

Xinjiang

'I lost everything'

Many Uighurs have spoken about Xinjiang's crackdown, but they tend to do so anonymously, out of fear that China will punish their relatives still in the region

Rushan Abbas, an activist living in Virginia, heard that her aunt and sister disappeared in Xinjiang six days after she publicly criticised China's human rights record.

But Tohti is speaking on the record, because he says he's "lost everything" already.

Xinjiang

He told INSIDER: "I don't fear any retaliation at this point of my life. I lost everything."

"I'm ready for any consequences," he said.

Tohti hopes that his story will inspire governments outside China to stand up to Beijing. Many countries in the Muslim world have largely avoided confronting Beijing in the past — likely fearing Beijing's economic retaliation, or exposing their own human rights record— but more and more are beginning to speak out.

Read more:A wall of silence around China's oppression of its Muslim minority is starting to crumble

International activists this week called on the UN Human Rights Council to dispatch an independent fact-finding mission into Xinjiang.

Michelle Bachelet, the UN's human rights chief, has appealed for access into the region for months, but Beijing has continually told her to back off.

Tohti said: "I hope the international community, especially influential countries, will help put and end to the atrocities in my home country and free millions of Uighurs and their separated children."

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: North Korea's leader Kim Jong Un is 35 — here's how he became one of the world's scariest dictators

A photographer asked teenagers to edit their photos until they thought they looked 'social media ready,' and the results are shocking

$
0
0

rankin before after

  • A new photo series shows the lengths some people go to to edit their photos for Instagram.
  • The project, by renowned photographer Rankin, asked 15 British teenagers to take five minutes editing their appearances to make them "social media-ready."
  • Most of them made their noses narrower, slimmed their faces, edited out their freckles, enlarged their eyes and lips, and added makeup.
  • Rankin says the project highlights that "we are living in a world of FOMO, sadness, increased anxiety, and Snapchat dysmorphia."

A photo series has shown the lengths some young people go to to edit their appearance before posting pictures on social media platforms like Instagram — and the results are pretty shocking.

The project, entitled Selfie Harm, saw renowned British photographer Rankin photograph 15 British teens aged 13-19.

The teens were then asked to spend five minutes editing the photo until they thought it looked "social media-ready."

The shots show not only how simple it is to change your appearance in a few minutes (thanks to the plethora of apps available nowadays), but also the pressure young people are under to look a certain way.

Read more: 33 Instagram accounts to follow in 2019 that will actually make you feel good about your body

Scroll down to see the images before and after by using the slider on each photo.

Many of the girls made their noses narrower, slimmed their faces, and edited out their freckles.

Some enlarged their eyes and lips, and added makeup too.

"People are mimicking their idols," Rankin said, "and all for social media likes."

"This is just another reason why we are living in a world of FOMO, sadness, increased anxiety, and Snapchat dysmorphia," he continued.

"It's time to acknowledge the damaging effects that social media has on people's self-image."

Although the young women said they preferred their unedited pictures, not one left their appearance untouched.

"I found it disturbing how big even the small changes are," Rankin added. "It's so simple, almost like creating a cartoon character of yourself.

"What's even scarier is there's little or no debate happening around this. Something like Photoshop, which is a much more complex and inaccessible program, is actually part of a huge social ethical discussion.

"These filters are something very new and, in my opinion, a lot more dangerous. It’s almost like giving a teenager access to a Photoshop expert."

The photos are part of an exhibition called Visual Diet, a project by M&C Saatchi, Rankin, and the MTArt Agency team designed to explore how the images we consume affect our mental health.

The website reads: "In the age of the influencer, we're increasingly force-fed thousands of images every day.

"Hyper-retouched, sexually gratuitous bite-sized images are served up fast and fleeting. They often leave us feeling hollow and inadequate.

"These are the empty calories. The visual calories we gorge on because they're there. Our appetite for this type of content is insatiable. It is visual sugar and we are addicted.

"Consuming too much of this content seriously harms your mental health."

Visit INSIDER's homepage for more.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This Sephora makeup class helps individuals impacted by cancer learn different makeup techniques

Trump didn't bother to tell his top general in the Middle East that he was going to pull troops out of Syria

$
0
0

Donald Trump

  • President Donald Trump made the decision to withdraw troops from Syria without consulting his combatant commander in the region, the top US general in the Middle East revealed Tuesday.
  • "I was not consulted," Gen. Joseph Votel, the head of US Central Command, told the Senate Armed Services Committee.
  • The president's decision to withdraw troops from Syria shocked top US officials and allies and was reportedly the final straw for former Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis, who has since resigned from his post; Trump has claimed he forced Mattis out.

President Donald Trump did not consult his top general in the Middle East before he decided to withdraw US troops from Syria.

"I was not aware of the specific announcement," Gen. Joseph Votel, the Army officer who as head of US Central Command oversees the wars in Syria and Afghanistan, told the Senate Armed Services Committee Tuesday. "Certainly we are aware that he had expressed a desire and intent in the past to depart."

"We were not, I was not consulted," he added.

The president declared victory over the Islamic State in a video message on Dec. 19.

"We have won against ISIS," Trump said, "We've beaten them, and we've beaten them badly. We've taken back the land. And, now it's time for our troops to come back home." An estimated 2,000 US troops are currently serving in Syria.

Apparently such a major decision didn't warrant a consult with or even courtesy call to the combatant commander, the commander who leads all military operations in the region. Even the president of Turkey has warned Trump that a rapid pull-out could be disastrous.

Last week, senior US intelligence officials testified before Senate Intelligence Committee, warning that ISIS "will exploit any reduction in [counterterrorism] pressure to strengthen its clandestine presence and accelerate rebuilding key capabilities."

This week, the Pentagon, citing CENTCOM, reported that ISIS "could likely resurge in Syria within six to twelve months and regain limited territory" if pressure is not maintained.

Votel explained Tuesday that while the caliphate is crumbling, "the fight against ISIS and violent extremists is not over and our mission has not changed." He stressed that all that has been won on the battlefield can only be secured by "maintaining a vigilant offensive" against ISIS.

Trump has repeatedly disregarded the observations and advice of the US intelligence community and his senior military leaders. His decision to withdraw from Syria was reportedly the final straw for former Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis.

"I think I would've been a good general," Trump said early last month.

Read More:Trump says he would have made a 'good general' while trashing Mattis' service and claiming he really fired him

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Inside the Coast Guard's 8-week boot camp where recruits go through extreme physical tests and brutal 'smoke sessions'

IUD and implant insertions jumped 22% after Trump's election in 2016, and it may not be a coincidence

$
0
0

MIRENA IUD

  • A new study found that insertions of IUDs and implants increased by about 22% after President Trump's election in November 2016.
  • The study looked at more than 3 million women enrolled in commercial insurance and compared insertion rates in November 2015 and November 2016. 
  • Both methods provide highly effective, reversible birth control for three to 10 years, depending on which type you choose. 

In the days after President Donald Trump's election in November 2016, some women on social media started encouraging others to get intrauterine devices, or IUDs.

The concern seemed to stem from fears that affordable birth control access would be threatened if, once in office, President Trump followed through on a campaign promise to repeal the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The IUD, a no-maintenance method that lasts three to 10 years depending on brand, offered the chance to get long-lasting, effective contraception.

"Get your IUD," Twitter user @grimalkinrn wrote in a tweet on November 9, 2016. "Get your birth control that will outlast Trump."

Now, new research suggests that people really did flock to doctor's offices for IUD insertions in the wake of the election, TIME reported. 

The research letter, published Monday in JAMA Internal Medicine, studied more than 3 million women ages 18 to 45 who were enrolled in commercial insurance plans. It looked at the number of insertions of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), a category that includes IUDs and the arm implant, in the 30 days before and after November 8, 2016, and November 8, 2015. 

They found that, compared to the year before, LARC insertions increased by nearly 22% in the month after the election. 

If that increase was projected to apply to the 33 million 18-to 45-year-old US women with employer health insurance, it would "correspond to approximately 700 additional insertions per day in association with the 2016 election," the authors wrote. 

birth control implant insertion

The New York Times noted that, because the study didn't evaluate patients' motivation to get IUDs or implants, it's not possible to know for sure if they were spurred by the election.

Read more: 4 ways to get birth control that's affordable  — or even free

The research has some other limitations, too, the authors wrote. They covered only a short period, so they can't determine if the higher rate of LARC insertions lasted beyond that 30-day post-election stretch. They also studied only women with commercial insurance, meaning the results may not be the same for women with no insurance or public health insurance. 

The authors concluded that the findings "could reflect a response to fears of losing contraceptive coverage because of President Trump's opposition to the ACA or an association of the 2016 election with reproductive intentions or LARC awareness."

normal pain bleeding after IUD insertion

TIME reporter Jamie Ducharme also noted that some other sources suggest IUD insertions surged following the election. In January 2017, for example, Planned Parenthood's then-president Cecile Richards said in an interview that demand for IUD insertions was up 900%. A 2017 analysis from AthenaHealth also found that IUD-related doctor's visits rose 19% between October and December 2016, though a follow-up analysis from the same company published in June 2017 found that LARC demand had returned to pre-election levels.

It seems some doctors observed this trend, too. 

"My slots would be booked with women wanting to get IUDs," Dr. Aparna Sridhar, an associate professor in obstetrics and gynecology at the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, told the New York Times on Monday. "They would specifically state that they are getting an IUD because of the political changes they are witnessing."

IUDs and implants are both more than 99% effective in preventing pregnancy. The implant, a matchstick-sized rod that a doctor inserts into the arm, lasts for three years. IUDs are also inserted by a doctor, and there are five options to choose from. ParaGard, the copper IUD, lasts 10 years, while the four hormonal IUDs (Skyla, Liletta, Kyleena, and Mirena) last three to five years. 

Visit INSIDER's homepage for more.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This is a spa just for pregnant women

5 surprisingly helpful uses for Alexa right now

$
0
0

amazon alexa

  • Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos said that the Alexa smart assistant was kept "very busy" over the holidays.
  • There's a lot you can do with Alexa to keep her busy and working for you, beside the obvious. Here are 5 ideas. 

 

As Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos said last week during the company's fourth quater earnings: "Alexa was very busy during her holiday season."

She has also been busy since then too, as the Echo Dot smart speaker was the #1 most sold product on Amazon in all of 2018.

With 80,000 Alexa skills (a skill is the Alexa equivalent of a smartphone app), there is so much you can do with her.

Here are 5 ideas:

1. Whisper to Alexa when you don’t want to wake someone

Why? So you don’t wake up the [insert husband / wife / friend / roommate / baby / cat / you get the point]. It’s also pretty cool that Alexa can whisper.

How? Say anything to Alexa in a whisper like “Alexa, set alarm for 6:30am,” and she will whisper back at a lower volume.

Set-up (less than 30 seconds): Enable whispered responses by opening your Alexa app, tapping the hamburger icon in the upper left corner > Settings > Alexa Account > Alexa Voice Responses and toggle “Whispered Responses” on.

Pro Tip: While you don’t have to be right next to your Echo smart speaker for Alexa to understand your whispered commands, if you have any background noise or you’re really far away (a distance where you’d normally be shouting a command so she could hear you), Alexa probably won’t understand you.



2. Turn your regular lights into smart lights with a smart plug

Why? Because turning lights on and off with your voice is magical. And setting up an Alexa smart plug with your current lights is so much easier than setting up smart lights. The smart plug is essentially a voice-activated on/off switch that you control by talking to Alexa.

How?“Alexa, turn on living room light”

Set-up (easy): The Amazon Smart Plug (which is normally $25 but currently on sale for $15) is the easiest smart plug to set up (you pretty much just have to plug it in and open the Alexa app), but there are some cheaper options that also work with Alexa from Gosund, Teckin, Etekcity and others.

Pro Tip: The one downside of a smart plug versus smart lights is that, since it’s really just a smart on/off switch, you miss out on the ability to set different lighting scenes like dimming your lights (although there is a simple (partial) workaround to dim your lights with an Alexa smart plug).



3. Upgrade your wake-up routine with lights and music

Why? Imagine a world in which you can wake up peacefully as your lights gradually come on to coax you out of bed while your favorite morning music plays softly. Once you live in that world, you’ll never want to go back.

How? If you set up an Alexa wake-up routine that kicks off at a certain time, all you have to do is sit back and let it happen. Here is my wake-up routine…

  • 6:35am: Alexa turns on my bedroom smart lights dimmed at the lowest level
  • 6:40am: She turns them on slightly brighter
  • 6:45am: Alexa plays my Otis Redding Pandora station — this usually gets me up out of bed
  • 7am: The lights come on at full brightness — so if I'm not up, I now have no choice but to get up

This is ten times better than waking up to a loud beeping alarm clock and hitting the snooze button, which is how I used to get up. It also means I no longer have to sleep with my phone on my night table for a dependable alarm clock.

Set-up (it’s a lot easier than you might think): Open your Alexa app, tap the hamburger icon in the upper left corner > Routines and tap the + icon in the upper right corner. This will take you to the “New Routine” tab where you can follow these instructions on how to set up Alexa routines to choose a trigger (could be a specific time or a voice command like “Alexa, good morning”) and the things you want to happen in response to the trigger (could be the lights coming on, music playing, weather and traffic updates or even Alexa telling you a joke).

Pro Tip: I also have a routine that turns the bedroom lights off at 9am. I love that I no longer have to remember to turn the lights off when I leave the house because Alexa just does it for me.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

France fires nuclear-capable missile in a rare show as Russia and US feud over arms treaty

$
0
0

Charles de gaulle dassault rafale

  • France fired off a nuclear-capable missile from a fighter jet after a treaty between the US and Russia that formed the cornerstone of European nuclear security collapsed.
  • France has been flexing its military muscles and asserting its independence since feuding with President Donald Trump over defense issues. 
  • France fired the missile from a fighter jet in a exercise that tested every element of an actual nuclear strike.

France, one of Europe's two nuclear powers, fired off a nuclear-capable missile from a fighter jet while the US and Russia feud over the death of a nuclear treaty that saw Europe purged of most of its weapons of mass destruction during the hair-triggered days of the Cold War. 

France tested all phases of a nuclear strike with an 11-hour-long mission that saw a Rafale fighter jet refuel and actually fire an unarmed missile capable of carrying a nuclear warhead, Reuters quoted France's military as saying.

"These real strikes are scheduled in the life of the weapons' system," French air force spokesman Colonel Cyrille Duvivier said. "They are carried out at fairly regular intervals, but remain rare because the real missile, without its warhead, is fired."

Read more:We ranked the world's nuclear arsenals — here's why China's came out on top

France also operates a fleet of ballistic missile submarines that can fire off some of its 280 some nuclear warheads, but the subs move in secrecy and don't provide the same messaging effect as more visible fighter jets. 

France's nuclear test run comes as the US and Russia fell out of the Intermediate Nuclear Forces treaty, which banned both countries from building nuclear missiels that fly between 300 and 3,200 miles. 

In 1987, this treaty saw Europe and Russia remove an entire class of nuclear warheads from the continent in one of the most successful acts of arms control ever. 

The US has accused Russia of having violated the treaty for years, and with all NATO's backing, the US finally decided to exit the treaty.

Read more: NATO is on Trump's side as Democrats attack him for pulling out of the nuke deal with Russia

But while France as part of NATO sided with the US, France has increasingly sought to distance itself from the US in foreign policy and military affairs, and increasing the visibility of its nuclear arsenal is one way to assert independence. 

France flexes its nuclear might against Russia, but also the US

trump macron

French President Emmanuel Macron, during a spat with President Donald Trump, pushed the idea of creating a European army, which got backing from Germany. Experts, however, point out that this idea is largely redundant under NATO and unlikely to ever take shape.

Nonetheless, Trump took direct offense to Macron's idea and mocked him over it on Twitter

"We Europeans cannot remain spectators of our own security," French Armed Forces Minister Florence Parly said on Tuesday at a conference in Portugal.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Inside the Coast Guard's 8-week boot camp where recruits go through extreme physical tests and brutal 'smoke sessions'

America's infrastructure is decaying — here's a look at how terrible things have gotten

$
0
0

Oroville Damn

  • There's speculation President Donald Trump will discuss infrastructure in his State of the Union address on Tuesday.
  • America's infrastructure is desperately in need of investment, according to the American Society of Civil Engineers. The ASCE estimates the US needs to spend some $4.5 trillion by 2025 to fix the country's roads, bridges, dams, and other infrastructure. 
  • Trump reportedly"hates" major parts of the infrastructure plan he unveiled in 2018, which proposed $200 billion in federal funding designed to finance new projects and repairs while incentivizing private investment.

President Donald Trump is expected to discuss infrastructure in his State of the Union address on Tuesday, but how exactly he plans to do so is unclear.

The Washington Post reports that White House press secretary Sarah Sanders told CNN on Tuesday that infrastructure could be an area of compromise for Democrats and Republicans, but according to The Wall Street Journal, Trump Administration officials pushed for the removal of a call for Congress to pass Trump’s infrastructure plan from an early draft of his State of the Union address.

Trump reportedly "hates" major parts of the infrastructure plan he unveiled in 2018, which proposed $200 billion in federal funding designed to finance new projects and repairs while incentivizing private investment.

Read more: Uber and Lyft are having a terrible effect on public transportation, new research shows

No matter what Trump says about infrastructure during his State of the Union address, one thing is clear: America's infrastructure is in dire need of repairs.

According to the American Society of Civil Engineers' 2017 Infrastructure Report Card, which is published every four years, US infrastructure gets a D+ grade. It got the same grade in 2013.

The ASCE estimates the US needs to spend some $4.5 trillion by 2025 to improve the state of the country's roads, bridges, dams, airports, schools, and more.

The report breaks down the state of infrastructure in 16 different categories. Here's a look at each category's final grade, according to the organization.

SEE ALSO: These are the world's most valuable passports in 2019

Aviation: D

Airports and air traffic control systems are in serious need of an update, the report found. 

With some two million people per day coming through US airports, congestion is becoming a major problem. In fact, the report estimates that 24 out of the top 30 airports in the US could soon hit "Thanksgiving-peak traffic volume" one day a week. 



Bridges: C+

US bridges are aging. 

Out of the 614,387 bridges in the US, more than 200,000 are more than 50 years old. 

The report estimates it would cost some $123 billion just to fix the bridges in the US. 



Dams: D

According to the report, there were some 15,500 high-hazard dams in the US in 2016. 



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Tesla is going to need to raise more money in 2019, Morgan Stanley says (TSLA)

$
0
0

Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla

  • Tesla last week reported another profitable quarter and said it would achieve a profit for "all quarters going forward."
  • The electric-car maker also said it has sufficient cash on hand make its biggest debt payment in March 2019, the largest in its history. 
  • Morgan Stanley thinks Tesla will need to raise $2.5 billion of equity capital in the third quarter of 2019 and that its full-year free cash flow will be negative. 
  • Watch Tesla trade live.

Tesla is not full self-sufficient enough to fund its growth ambitions, Morgan Stanley says. 

Last week, after reporting a profitable quarter —  marking the first time it has achieved two consecutive profitable quarters— Tesla said it would be profitable in "all quarters going forward." The electric-car maker also said it has sufficient cash on hand to pay for $920 million worth of convertible bonds set to mature in March 2019 — the biggest debt payment in its history.

While Tesla is confident about its profitability and its ability to generate cash, Morgan Stanley says the company will still need more capital. 

"We forecast Tesla 1Q19 free cash flow to be negative $600 million driven by a sequential decline in profit and working capital leakage," said Adam Jonas, an analyst at Morgan Stanley. He pushed out his forecast of a $2.5 billion equity capital raise to the third quarter of the year. 

Jonas sees Tesla's full-year 2019 free cash flow as negative $246 million, up from his previous estimate of negative $809 million, saying he made the adjustment in large part due to a materially lower forecast for capital expenditures this year. 

Tesla had $3.69 billion cash and cash equivalents on hand as of December 31, according to its newly released balance sheet. The company said its cash position improved by $1.45 billion in the second half of 2018.

Jonas noted that Tesla's unstable executive group added risks for the company to achieve self-financing. The electric-car maker said during last week's earnings release that CFO Deepak Ahuja would retire from the company for a second time.

"We do not believe investors will assume the company is fully self-sufficient without a more sustained period of execution," Jonas said. 

He reiterated his "equal-weight" rating and $283 price target — 11% below where shares were trading Tuesday. He added that believes Tesla is "fully-valued." 

Tesla was up 5% so far this year.

Now read:

Tesla

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Japanese lifestyle guru Marie Kondo explains how to organize your home once and never again

Rewards-related offerings are the leading driver of consumers' credit card choices — but they can be pricey for issuers

$
0
0

This is a preview of a research report from Business Insider Intelligence, Business Insider's premium research service. To learn more about Business Insider Intelligence, click here.

5b478d977b67141e008b48b5 1334 1001

The average US consumer holds about three nonretail credit cards with a balance over $6,000, according to Experian. As confidence rises, spending is hitting prerecession levels. For banks, that should be a good thing, since credit cards are profitable. But the push to attract a particularly interested and engaged customer base through sign-up bonuses and lucrative rewards offerings has led banks into a rat race, with surging expenses and rising delinquencies that are hurting returns.

To make credit cards as valuable as they could be, and to bring returns back up, issuers need to direct their efforts not just toward becoming one of consumers’ three cards, but also toward becoming their favorite card. Rewards are more important than ever — three of the top four primary card determinants cited by respondents to a Business Insider Intelligence survey were rewards-related — so abandoning them isn’t effective.

Instead, issuers need to be more resourceful with their rewards offerings, focusing on areas that encourage habit formation, promote high-volume spending, and help to offset some of the rewards costs while building engagement and loyalty.

In this report, Business Insider Intelligence sizes the US consumer credit card market, explains why return on assets (ROA) is on the decline, highlights the importance of rewards in attracting customers, and lays out three next-generation rewards strategies that are popular among certain demographics, which issuers can implement to return their card business to profitability. To drive this analysis, we conducted a survey centered on users’ card preferences to over 700 US members of our proprietary panel in May 2018.

Here are some key takeaways from the report: 

  • Competition driven by consumer card appetite in the US is hurting issuer returns. Consumer confidence and regulatory policy that favors credit cards should be a boon to issuers. But the competition has surged expenses to unattainable levels and increased delinquencies, which are causing returns to trend down.
  • Consumers still value rewards above all when it comes to cards. Two-thirds of respondents to our survey cited rewards-related offerings as the leading driver of primary card status, but they can be pricey for issuers.
  • Using resources strategically and offering rewards types that encourage high-volume spending and drive engagement through habit formation, like flexible offerings, rewards for e-commerce, and local bonuses, could be the path to success in the future.

In full, the report:

  • Identifies the factors that are causing high credit appetite to hurt issuer returns.
  • Explains the value of top-of-wallet status, and evaluates the factors that drive it based on proprietary consumer data.
  • Defines three popular next-generation rewards options that issuers can use to drive up spending and engagement without breaking the bank.
  • Issues recommendations about how to offer these rewards and what demographic groups could be most receptive to them.

Join the conversation about this story »

From the "Rachel" to the silky blowout, here's Jennifer Aniston's famous hair evolution

$
0
0

jennifer aniston

  • Jennifer Aniston's hair has been a longtime topic of discussion and adoration. 
  • The actress has rocked many styles throughout her decades-long career in television and film.
  • Her tresses first made waves in 1995 after she rocked the "Rachel" haircut on NBC'S "Friends,"influencing hairstyles for the remainder of the '90s and beyond.

For as long as Jennifer Aniston has been famous, people have been talking about her hair, impossibly silky, perfectly highlighted, and super versatile.

She first turned heads with the "Rachel," the famous, angular haircut she rocked on the early seasons of "Friends." Since then, Aniston's hair has been under a microscope, with everyone eagerly awaiting what she (and longtime hair stylist Chris McMillan) will come up with next.

From the "Rachel" to a razor cut bob to blowouts galore, here's the complete evolution of Jennifer Aniston's picture-perfect hair. 

1990: When Jennifer Aniston was just starting out as an actress, she rocked her natural, dark brown color and wispy bangs.

Aniston was 21 in 1990, and she had just scored a lead role on the short-lived "Ferris Bueller" sitcom, which ran from 1990-1991. She rocked her natural hair at the time: chestnut brown, voluminous, with a '90s wispy bang.



1992: Aniston went even darker brown shortly before landing her role on "Friends."

Aniston went even darker brown in 1992, just two years shy of her life-changing turn as Rachel in "Friends." During this period, she had minor roles in films like "Leprechaun" and TV shows like "The Edge," but hadn't yet had a breakthrough



1994: She rocked a shorter length and beach waves during the first season of "Friends."

Rachel Green as we know and love her was almost played by actress Courteney Cox (who went on to play Monica). But, as fate had it, Jennifer Aniston got the part — and our decades-long obsession with the star commenced. The first season of "Friends" began in 1994, and Aniston was working a shorter, lighter, and wavier 'do at the time.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider
Viewing all 76301 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>