Quantcast
Channel: Business Insider
Viewing all 76301 articles
Browse latest View live

Salesforce billionaire Marc Benioff was hilarious at Silicon Valley's Game of Thrones premier

$
0
0

Marc Benioff iron throne

Silicon Valley was all aflutter Monday night when the titans of tech gathered at San Francisco's War Memorial Opera House. 

There were there to see HBO's US premier of Game of Thrones season 5, and rub elbows with the show's stars.

HBO chose San Francisco instead of say, LA, for a couple of reasons, the SF Chronicle's Benny Evangelista reports.

For one, just two weeks ago in this same town HBO announced it's new streaming service, HBO Now, along with a partnership making Apple TV its exclusive digital device partner for three months. (Shortly after, cable company Cablevision, said it has signed on to offer HBO Now, too.)

But more importantly, the Valley is swarming with Game of Throne fans, including some of the most powerful people in the tech industry. 

For instance, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, loves Games of Thrones so much that he paused negations with Instagram cofounder Kevin Systrom to watch the show with friends. That was during their whirlwind weekend negotiations in 2013 when Facebook bought Instagram for $1 billion. (Facebook also names a lot of the tech it invents in a Game of Thrones theme.)

So it's not surprising that Facebook live-streamed the Red Carpet entrance of all the stars and Valley big wigs at the event. The carpet, however, was, technically, black:

Major Valley players tweeted in excitement all through the event like this one from Cisco CTO Padmasree Warrior calling herself a "big fan."

 And she was also pretty happy to see Gwendoline Christie, the actress that plays GoT warrior Brienne.

But the best Valley titan tweets were from Marc Benioff, who was clearly delighted to be there.

Here he is in front of the Iron Throne.

 Here he is hamming it up with Biz Stone at the event, using Stone's new app Super.

And here is Marc Benioff cracking GoT jokes about having the same name as the director David Benioff, no relation.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The smartest people in the world share these common traits


These engineers are bringing the 90s back with light-up shoes for adults

$
0
0

Orphe is a smart shoe system that functions both as a customizable lighting system, a musical instrument and audio-visual controller. The sole of each shoe contains advanced motion sensors, around 100 full-color serially-controlled LEDs, and a wireless module.

The shoes come with iOS software that allows users to control the lights on the shoes. And the 9-axis sensors embedded in each sole pick up the movements of each shoe in real time. This data can then be used to wirelessly control various external devices. This allows the shoes to function as musical instruments and a video game controller.

For $270 you can reserve your own pair on the company's Indiegogo page.

To contribute to the campaign or to learn more about Orphe visit their Indiegogo page.

Video courtesy of no new folk studio Inc.

Follow BI Video: On Facebook

Join the conversation about this story »

A 28-year-old Disney animator describes the best and worst parts of her job

$
0
0

Daron NefcyDaron Nefcy spent a lot of time getting in trouble for doodling all over her schoolwork as a kid.

But it "really paid off," she excitedly tells Business Insider.

Nefcy is the creator, executive producer, and animator of a new show, "Star vs. The Forces of Evil," which Disney TV Animation is debuting later this month. 

The now 28-year-old, who studied Character Animation at the CalArts school in Los Angeles, recently spoke to Business Insider about how she got into the world of animation, what it's really like to work for Disney, and her best advice for aspiring artists.

This interview has been condensed and edited for clarity.

Business Insider: How and when did you decide you wanted to become an animation artist?

Daron Nefcy: I've always loved cartoons. I used to make my own comics in elementary school and decided in the fourth grade I wanted to make cartoons when I grew up. So all those years of getting into trouble for doodling all over my schoolwork really paid off!

BI: What kind of training have you gone through for this job? 

DN: I'm very lucky because I went from studying and graduating from a great animation-focused school, CalArts, right into a job at an animation studio.

At CalArts, we had to create our own student short film each year, which consisted of writing the story, storyboarding, pitching ideas, designing the characters, building an animatic, casting the roles, editing, sound mixing, and doing all of the hand drawn animation for the film. Before "Star," I got to work on some great shows at three different animation studios: Warner Brother's "MAD," Nickelodeon's "Robot and Monster" and Disney's "Wander Over Yonder."

Being able to work on a variety of different projects before my own really helped me learn how an animated TV show is run. While making the pilot for "Star," I also learned so much about the pilot process. When you're creating a pilot, you have a ton of time to make that one episode. But once it's in production, things move much quicker. 

BI: Tell me more about your current project, "Star vs. The Forces of Evil." 

DN: The show is about a princess from another dimension named Star Butterfly, who comes to Earth as a foreign exchange student. On Earth, she lives with a loving family, the Diaz's, who have a son her age named Marco. She and Marco become fast friends and go on all kinds of adventures together, in high school and the multiverse, fighting monsters along the way.  

BI: Can you explain the animation process?

DN: Well, it's a big process! One aspect that's cool about "Star" is that it's a storyboard-driven show, which means that each episode is mapped out visually by the artists, and they do hundreds of drawings per episode that illustrate exactly how the characters should be acting and how the staging should be, etc.

What's special about a board-driven show is that the board artists also do the writing. The writers on "Star" submit a two-page outline. Once that's approved, the board artists take the outline and basically turn it into a full script on paper (or drawings on a computer). It's a very hard process — the board artists need to be able to write dialogue, know story, draw, stage, act, and more. Basically they need to be incredibly talented.

In the television animation business, there's almost always a collective effort between the creator, executive producer, art director, background designer, character designer, and board artist — all of whom are animators — to get the design of a show down in the form of a "template." That template is then sent out of the country for the technical animation to be completed.

"Star vs. The Forces of Evil"

BI: What's the hardest or most challenging part of being an animator? 

DN: There are a lot of moving pieces to running a show. I'd say one of the hardest parts about the job is letting things go. You want the show to be perfect but this is TV and with deadlines you need to learn to let things go, you can't work on them forever.  

In addition, storyboard artists have really become modern day animators now that most shows are technically animated out of the country. Our storyboard artists sometimes have up to 2,000 drawings for an 11-minute board and they have to do the writing as well within a six week time period, so meeting deadlines can sometimes be a challenge.

BI: What's the best part of the job? 

DN: It takes many creative individuals who have exceptional artistic skills across a wide-range of positions to make an animated TV series from scratch.

Daron NefcyBI: What might surprise people most about your job?

DN: It's difficult to take time off! That's for anyone who works in animation, and also probably anyone who works in film. The deadlines don't change, so if you can't be around for a week you need someone to do your job for you that week. And in a lot of cases no one can do your job for you.  

One season of an animated show from start to finish takes about one and a half to two and a half years.   

Most of the actual animation is not done in the US. At Disney, our team consists of board artists, character designers, background painters, prop designers, and editors (about 40 people in the US) who handle all of the pre-production work. Then, the actual animation is done out of the country. The first season of "Star" is being animated in Canada and the Philippines. 

BI: When do people most frequently ask you about your job?

DN: I think I've gotten to the point in my life where the only people I hang out with work in animation and film. When I meet new people and they ask where I work I just say "Disney" and they always assume it's in the park. They always say, "Oh, that's so fun! I always wanted to work at Disneyland!" I rarely correct them. Working at Disneyland is super cool! 

BI: What's it like working for Disney? Did you always dream of working there?

DN: I did love Disney as a kid, but I never dreamed of working here. It's neat! Most of the time I'm working, but they do have some fun events here like art shows and remote control car races. 

StarBI: What's the coolest thing you've had the opportunity to do in your career?

DN: It's probably working with the amazing voice talent. I got to work with people like Jeffery Tambor, Jenny Slate, and Michael C Hall! How cool is that? 

BI: What's your best piece of advice for an aspiring animator or creator? 

DN: Keep drawing, and make your own films and comics! It's so easy now — all the tools are on the computer. The only thing you need is your own imagination, a good idea, and commitment. Keep making projects. The first ones are never good but if you keep making new ones you'll learn and they'll get better. 

BI: Anything else you think people should know about your profession?

DN: Drawing and painting for yourself is fun. Drawing for a living is a job. It's a job I love, but people need to remember that anything you do for a living becomes work. I only say this because a lot of people assume that drawing/writing/creating is always fun and therefore isn't real work and shouldn't be paid like real work. When I first got out of school, I had a lot of people saying things to me like, "Draw some characters for my project, it'll be good for your portfolio!" or, "Draw a logo for free for this company. Come on — it'll only take you five minutes!" None of that is true; all artists need to be paid fairly and respected. 

Also, I just want to reiterate that making a TV show is a group effort. You need to be collaborative or it won't work. To make a short film you can do that on your own, but for a TV show you need a good team who believes in you and the show and all those people need to be working hard. It's not just about sitting in a dark cube creating something.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 7 smart questions to ask at the end of every job interview

Business Insider is hiring an experienced travel reporter

$
0
0

isola di buranoBusiness Insider is looking for a reporter to join our travel team.

This job is for the person who loves seeing the world, exploring new cultures, or just living vicariously through others' adventures.  

You'll be writing stories about the best travel destinations, trends, news, and tips, while simultaneously working on longer features and slideshows. You will also have the opportunity to write about your own experiences.  

The ideal candidate should be an excellent writer, have at least 1 to 3 years of experience in a newsroom, be comfortable working for a fast-paced digital news site, and be passionate about travel. Experience in the travel industry and a network of travel contacts is a huge plus, as is an interest in social media. Copy-editing skills, light HTML and Photoshop experience are also useful.

This is a full-time position that's based in our New York City office and does not necessarily include travel.

APPLY HERE with your resume and cover letter specifying why this role is perfect for you. Please include any links to clips in your cover letter.

Business Insider offers competitive compensation packages complete with benefits. 

SEE ALSO: The 14 Best Tech Companies To Work For

Join the conversation about this story »

Ellen Pao's lawyer: Kleiner Perkins was run 'like a boys club' and was against her all along

$
0
0

Alan Exelrod and Lynne Hermle, lawyers in the Ellen Pao v. Kleiner Perkins case

Today, the jury is hearing closing arguments in interim Reddit CEO Ellen Pao's gender discrimination lawsuit against her former employer and Silicon Valley venture capital powerhouse Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers. 

In his closing argument, Pao's attorney Alan Exelrod told the jury that "they ran Kleiner Perkins like a boys club," and that Pao was never given a real chance to succeed — calling out Kleiner Perkins' arguments about Pao's personality and personal life as mere distractions. 

"The evidence in this case compels the conclusion that men were judged by one standard, and women by another,” Exelrod said, according to a Re/code live blog.

Exelrod focused on Pao's successes at Kleiner Perkins, including the performance reviews from her stint at the firm, which were generally positive. Whether or not she was abrasive or hard to work with, or how many women KP employs, or how much she earned are immaterial to the case, he argued.

The only thing on trial here was whether or not she was held back from promotion regardless of whether or not she did her job well, he argued. Men like Amol Deshpande and Wen Hsieh with performance reviews similar or worse than Pao's got their promotions, Exelrod argued.

“Again what we’re talking about is performance, not distractions. This case should be about what Ms. Pao did for Kleiner Perkins," Exelrod said.

Pao urged the firm to invest in Twitter way back in 2008, which would have made Kleiner Perkins a lot of money. She also took RPX, one of her portfolio companies, to a successful IPO. She managed teams, Exelrod says, and was well-regarded by John Doerr, a senior partner at the firm.

But Exelrod singled out Kleiner Perkins senior partner Ted Schlein as his example of everything wrong with the firm, as indicated by the fact that he made the extraordinary claim on the stand that women don't have the right "genetic makeup" to be venture capitalists.

“Sometimes in the courtroom you get statements that express real attitudes," Exelrod said. 

Pao's side will complete their closing statements after a lunch break, then Kleiner Perkins will have the chance to give its side of the story in its own closing arguments this afternoon. 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Venture Capital Legend Reveals How To Spot The Next Tech Superstar

Google should be terrified right now (GOOG, FB)

$
0
0

Larry Page

Is Larry Page asleep at the wheel? Because it sure feels like it. 

Facebook is conducting an all-out assault on Google. It just launched embeddable videos and a new ad network. Those businesses will compete with YouTube and Google's DoubleClick display ad business. 

Facebook has become a juggernaut in video lately, and this will only bolster its position. With its incredible data on users, it will be an attractive destination for video ads and display ads, weakening Google's display business. 

Google looks like it is basically helpless to stop Facebook. It doesn't have an answer for Facebook. It tried and failed with Google+. Google doesn't own a "stream" like Facebook's News Feed, where it can stick high-quality brand advertising right into what people are reading and doing.

From the outside looking in, as Facebook gets stronger, it looks like Google is running in the wrong direction. It looks like CEO Larry Page has handed off responsibility for the company at a critical time. 

While Mark Zuckerberg zeros in on real opportunity like mobile ads in the Facebook app, video plays in the app, monetizing Instagram, and building platforms with WhatsApp and Facebook messenger, Larry Page is looking at more pie-in-the-sky stuff like robotics and self driving cars. 

Robots and self-driving cars are cool, and we should all be thankful that Google is will to experiment with them. However, it's not clear they'll ever be huge businesses.

It feels like Page is bored with the nuts and bolts of running an advertising-based internet company. He seems to think things like Instagram or Snapchat are too prosaic. He isn't going to dive into the display ad business, pushing Google's business to the next level. He'd rather work on changing the world.

Mark ZuckerbergZuckerberg, meanwhile, is still interested in pushing his company forward, even if it means working on smaller projects like video ads. 

To be clear, Google is not suddenly going to go kaput. It's not at risk of going out of business. It will continue to mint money. But, it's hard to see where big growth is going to come from.

Mobile is neutralizing the power of the search business. People are using apps more and more for their searches. 

YouTube is not the business people thought it would be. It did just $4 billion in revenue last year, and it's only breaking even.

Android is a fantastically successful mobile operating system, but Apple's iPhone has the most valuable users, and it's taking share from Android. Android has never developed into a real business and it's unclear if it ever will.

What is the future of Google's business? Larry Page has been a strong advocate for Google inventing the future through fantastic ideas like balloons that deliver internet, and contacts that measure glucose, and a startup that can prolong our lives. But are those ever going to become businesses? 

In Google's defense, the tech industry tends to move in quick cycles. Just two years ago, the world was in love with Google and thought it was going to be a trillion dollar company. Facebook three years ago was seen as a risky company. Apple was tanking three years ago. Today, that's all turned around. Facebook and Apple are the kings, and people are worried about Google.

So, it's entirely possible we're being overly harsh reactionaries. 

But, it feels different this time. Right now it feels like Google is directionless and Facebook has all the momentum. It feels like Google could turn into the next Microsoft — a company with brilliant people and brilliant ideas that fails to deliver, sending the stock sideways for a decade. 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This 9-year-old makes $1 million a year opening toys

Anti-immigration Minuteman Project leader supports Ted Cruz

$
0
0

Ted Cruz

Jim Gilchrist, founder and president of the Minuteman Project, which organizes armed vigilantes patrols along the southern U.S. border, is a supporter of presidential candidate Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas).

On Tuesday, Gilchrist applauded Cruz in a Facebook posting that declared, "I support Senator Ted Cruz for president." 

"He is the only candidate from any party that has come out of the 'politically correct' closet," Gilchrist wrote of Cruz. 

Gilchrist's organization, which has been labeled a "nativist extremist group" by the Southern Poverty Law Center mobilizes armed volunteers to run volunteer scout patrols along the U.S. border with Mexico to prevent the arrival of illegal immigrants. 

In his Facebook post, Gilchrist specifically praised Cruz's positions on immigration.

He said Cruz "earnestly promised to bring the nation back under the rule of law insofar as the reckless disregard of U.S. immigration law enforcement that has gone unchecked for four decades now."

In Congress, Cruz has been one of the most prominent opponents of President Barack Obama's push for immigration reform.

"The only way to stop the border crisis is to stop Obama's amnesty," he told Politico last summer. 

In an email to Business Insider on Wednesday, Gilchrist predicted Cruz would not engage in "pandering to the pro-amnesty-for-all fanatics."

He also clarified his Facebook post and said it was not a formal endorsement. 

"I have not officially endorsed anyone for president. I just boast of my support for what Senator Cruz appears to stand for. I still like Mike Huckabee or Scott Walker as contenders in this race as well," he said.

This isn't Gilchrist's first time weighing in on a presidential race. He sparked controversy among other Minuteman members in 2007 when he endorsed former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee (R) for president and praised Huckabee's "Secure America" plan to protect the U.S. border.

Gilchrist's organization has been plagued by infighting in recent years. The Minuteman Civil Defense Corps, which was founded by Gilchrist's former partner, was critical of his support for Huckabee. Though Huckabee's team touted Gilchrist's support, he later clarified that it wasn't an official endorsement from the organization and maintained he was speaking as an individual. 

Cruz's campaign did not respond to a request for comment on Gilchrist's expression of support for Cruz. 

View Gilchrist's full Facebook post, which included a link to a Huffington Post article criticizing Cruz, below:

jim gilchrist

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's how President Obama starts every morning

Here are the winners of the 2014 US Military Photographer Awards

$
0
0

military photo

A panel of judges in Fort Meade, Maryland have made their selections for the 2014 Military Photographer awards

The judges have handed out awards to military photographers for their amazing work in ten different categories including Sports, Pictorial, and Combat Documentation (Operational). The judges have also named the overall best military photographer for 2014. 

Air Force Staff Sgt. Vernon Young was selected as the Military Photographer of the year. His photos ranged from evocative portraits of Afghans to scenes of US forces training before deployment. 

"Recon Patrols" (First Place: Combat Documentation, Operational)

Soldiers assigned to Palehorse Troop, 4th Squadron, 2nd Calvary Regiment move over rough terrain during Operation Alamo Scout 13, Kandahar Province, Afghanistan, on Feb. 10, 2014. The operation was a joint effort between Palehorse troops and the Afghan National Army's 205th Corps Mobile Strike Force to conduct reconnaissance patrols in villages around Kandahar Airfield.



"Wounded Warrior" (Second Place: Combat Documentation, Operational)

Casualties airlifted by an Afghan Air Force C-130 Hercules from a Taliban attack on Camp Bastion, are offloaded on Dec. 1, 2014 at Kabul International Airport. The Afghan military successfully repelled the attack on the camp after receiving control of the base from coalition forces a month earlier.



"Afghan Gunner" (Third Place: Combat Documentation, Operational)

An Afghan Air Force (AAF) Mi-17 aerial gunner fires an M-240 machine gun while flying over a weapons range March 13, 2014, near Kabul, Afghanistan. US Air Force Airmen from the 438th Air Expeditionary Wing/NATO Air Training Command-Afghanistan flew a night-vision goggle training mission with an AAF aircrew to further increase the operational capability of the AAF.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Stocks are getting slammed

$
0
0

Screen Shot 2015 03 25 at 3.29.18 PM

Stocks are selling off. 

Near  3:30 pm ET, stocks were at their lows of the day with the Dow off more than 250 points as the biotech index was down more than 3% and having its worst day of the year

The Dow was down 254 points, the S&P 500 was down 25 points, and the Nasdaq was down 105 points.

The tech-heavy Nasdaq, which houses many of the biotech stocks leading the market lower, was down more than 2%.  

Oil prices were little changed, though the latest data from the EIA showed that oil inventories grew by more than 8 million barrels last week and continue to be at their highest level in more than 80 years. 

In economic data, durable goods orders disappointed, falling 1.4% against expectations for a 0.2% increase. 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Nationwide's Super Bowl commercial about dead children is about corporate profits ... in a way that we can all appreciate

China has created the world's first hydrogen fuel cell streetcar

$
0
0

China Hydrogen Tram Car

Chinese cities have become increasingly known more for pollution than for the new skyscrapers that have transformed skylines over the past two decades of development. 

This month, Chinese mass transit took a step toward alleviate the pollution problem. The world's first hydrogen-powered streetcar rolled off a production line at Qingdao Sifang Co. The tram will be able to reach speeds as high as 43 mph. Range will be 62 miles, after which the tram will take 3 minutes to refuel.

Hydrogen fuel cells generate electricity by creating a chemical reaction using hydrogen and oxygen. The only byproduct is water. This means that the 380-passenger, hydro-powered tram will be able to provide pollution-free public transportation in China's cities. 

The Sifang hydrogen tram is part of the Chinese government's plans to boost rail technology. According to Bloomberg, the plan calls for $32-billion in investment over a 5-year period. China would also construct an addition 1,200 miles of tram tracks during this time. 

Although hydrogen fuel cell technology has not been commonly employed in public transit. Carmakers such as General Motors, Honda, Hyundai, and Toyota have all invested in this alternative means of propulsion.

Critics of hydrogen fuel cells often point out that although the technology itself emits only water, hydrogen requires conventional means of power generation to produce.

In addition to the hydrogen tram, state-owned Sifang also intends to build traditional streetcars, including licensed Skoda models from the Czech Republic.

SEE ALSO: If James Bond needed a stylish SUV, it would look like this Aston Martin concept car

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This massive outdoor escalator in China is 10 stories high

Mark Cuban shares the most important lesson he learned in his 20s

$
0
0

young mark cuban

Shortly after Mark Cuban got his bachelor's degree from Indiana University in 1981, he moved in with some friends in Dallas and became a bartender.

After getting sick of making drinks, Cuban worked at a PC software business, where he built up a strong clientele but provoked his boss to fire him for disobeying an order.

He was left with no savings and no means to pay his bills; it was as good a time as any to venture out on his own, he figured, and so he started a software distribution company called MicroSolutions.

He partnered with an experienced executive, and soon they had a nice thing going — until their receptionist embezzled and ran away with $83,000 of the company's $85,000.

As Cuban explains in his book "How to Win at the Sport of Business," he didn't give up or seek revenge. Instead, he buckled down and spent countless hours learning about the software he sold so that he would outperform the competition. He eventually sold MicroSolutions in 1990 to H&R Block for $6 million, personally making around $2 million. It was his first big deal.

He tells Business Insider that the greatest lesson he learned in his 20s was that "with time and effort I could learn any new technology that was released."

Rather than a boast, it's a message to entrepreneurs that when you hit dire straits, your competition isn't going to slow down for you to catch up, but you can accelerate past them with the knowledge you acquire. And Cuban doesn't suggest you spend the money or go in debt for an MBA.

"I remember going into customer meetings or talking to people in the industry and tossing out tidbits about software or hardware," he writes. "Features that worked, bugs in the software. All things I had read. I expected the ongoing response of: 'Oh yeah, I read that too in such-and-such.' That's not what happened. They hadn't read it then, and they still haven't started reading it."

Cuban says that despite a minimal background in computers, he was outperforming so-called experts in the field simply because he put time and effort in. It's why, he writes, he still allocates a chunk of his day to reading whatever he can to gain an edge in the businesses he's involved in.

"Most people won't put in the time to get a knowledge advantage," he writes.

Cuban explains that college is the time you pay to learn, but "now that you have graduated, it's your chance to get paid to learn. And what if you aren't a recent college grad? The same logic applies. It is time to get paid to learn."

SEE ALSO: Mark Cuban's 3 fundamental rules for running a business

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Mark Cuban Explains How His Confidential Messaging App Cyber Dust Works

Here's how to have a successful career without ever being promoted

$
0
0

Woman Working in Home Office

We recently solicited readers to submit their most pressing career-related questions.

With help from Lynn Taylor, a national workplace expert and the author of "Tame Your Terrible Office Tyrant: How to Manage Childish Boss Behavior and Thrive in Your Job," we've answered the following: "Can I still be successful without moving up the corporate ladder and getting promoted frequently? I'm comfortable staying where I am, and want to know if that's detrimental to my ability to achieve professional success." 

The short answer is: yes, you can. 

Here's Taylor's full response:

This reader raises a very poignant question.

Many people in corporate America are conditioned to believe that without rising up the org chart and attaining fancier, more elaborate titles, they'll stagnate in their careers. But that can be a myth. If you excel at your work, find reward in it, and have a good rapport with your colleagues and boss, you may well have a great argument in staying where you are.  

A progressive boss will be open to understanding what makes you tick. After all, these are highly coveted aspects of any job. Promotions and titles are more outwardly focused. Success is highly personal and can only be defined by you 

I witness many situations in which employees aspire to the next level and title, but a "be careful what you wish for" scenario unfolds. A couple of classic examples are sales and creative professionals who get promoted to managerial positions, yet soon realize that they dislike the requisite administrative or operational duties. They ultimately miss applying their core passion of selling or applying their gift of creative skills. Others just wish for the glory days of their prior work culture. On occasion, employees return to their former positions, as both employee and employer see the bigger picture. 

climbing ladderThe key is whether you can infuse enough challenge in your job to make it feel rewarding over time, versus following a routine. In that same vein, weigh the importance of compensation.

If titles and promotions don't matter, but your salary does, then the expectation is that you'll contribute with an ever-increasing skill set and have the desire to grow with the company in some fashion. You may need to be flexible according to the needs of the firm through a slight modification in your current job description, for example.

Another consideration is just how you communicate your wishes to your boss. For example, if your manager is dropping hints about a higher or slightly different position and title, be prepared to explain how you feel you can contribute more significantly in your current role. You want to convey that you're dedicated; place high value on making a difference; and enjoy accepting greater challenge, versus appearing complacent. 

Everyone has a different "career currency"— how they value their work in the marketplace. For some, their career currency is salary and title, but for others, it's measured by work-life balance, applying their best skills, having a highly motivational boss, or managing a great team.

The best approach is to know your career currency and priorities, and to convey the benefits to your boss. People do their best work when they're content. To the extent you can demonstrate your ability to continuously deliver excellent results that match the goals of your employer, you stand a good chance of finding success as defined by you.

Readers: Want us to answer your questions related to your career or job search? Tweet Careers editor Jacquelyn Smith @JacquelynVSmith or email her at jsmith[at]businessinsider[dot]com, and we'll do our best to answer them.

SEE ALSO: 3 Ways To Get Promoted Quickly

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: How To Respond To 8 Illegal Interview Questions

This 27-year-old failed on Shark Tank — now she’s part of Silicon Valley’s hottest startup farm

$
0
0

Lumi CEO Jesse GenetWalking into ABC’s “Shark Tank” last September, Lumi CEO Jesse Genet asked for $250,000 for 5% of her company.

Lumi was a 3-year old startup selling photo printing kits online. It would allow users to print any type of logos or graphics — using natural sunlight — on things like a t-shirt, a wall, or even a car. It only had about $1 million in annual sales, but Genet valued her company at $5 million.

The “Sharks,” or the show’s panel of investors, weren’t too nice about it.

“I like you, but I don’t like the valuation — it’s a very rich valuation,” Laurie Greiner, the star QVC host told her.

Kevin O’Leary, the sharp-tongued dealmaker, was more direct: “That’s 50 times your free cash flow — It’s ridiculous.”

Under O’Leary’s estimation, Lumi’s $1 million sales would only translate to about $100,000 in after-tax profit, and he was only willing to value the company at $500,000. The sharks instead made a loan offer at a much lower valuation.

Genet left without a deal.

“[The comments] were dicey, but I can handle that,” Genet told Business Insider. “[Shark Tank] helped us realize what was really big about our business and what was not scalable.”

But that didn’t stop her from seeking other fund-raising opportunities. Shortly after recording the show (her episode aired in February), Genet applied for Y Combinator, the preeminent startup incubator in Silicon Valley.

YC liked her story: She once had to track down the person who owned the proprietary technology behind her product for two years to buy it out for $50,000, and had raised over $270,000 on Kickstarter to get it off the ground. Lumi was already selling in over 1,500 retailers like Urban Outfitters and Michael’s at that point.

So in December, Lumi joined YC, and during the three months there, it expanded its product line, revamped its website, and grew its overall revenue. Genet says it now has $2.5 million in sales, with customers from all 50 states and 20 countries worldwide. On Tuesday, Genet was on stage, presenting her product in front of thousands of potential investors at YC’s biannual Demo Day.

“What you just watched at our new YC presentation is a whole new set of products that we didn’t show the sharks,” Genet tells us.

Lumi is small compared to the outsized billion-dollar valuations of recent startups in the valley. But there are always one or two YC alums every year that go on to become the next big thing, such as Dropbox or Airbnb, and Lumi may well get there one day. But Genet thinks it’s still a long-term process.

“One key thing is not to rush your own business,” Genet says. “I’ve been working on these ideas since high school. Even if you’re not making a ton of money, that experience of just living the company day-in and day-out, getting that feedback and experience, is something you can never replace. You’ll have an authentic story to tell and a much better success.”

Here's Lumi on "Shark Tank":

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This is what happens to your brain and body when you check your phone before bed

2 words will decide the fate of a key air pollution rule

$
0
0

coal plant

A seemingly divided Supreme Court weighed the Obama administration's first-ever regulations aimed at reducing power plant emissions of mercury and other hazardous air pollutants that contribute to respiratory illnesses, birth defects and developmental problems in children.

The rule, known as Mercury and Air Toxic Standards (MATS), was the first federal limit on the amount of these types of toxic air pollutants.

The justices heard arguments Wednesday in a challenge brought by industry groups and Republican-led states arguing the EPA should have considered costs, which could reach $9.6 billion a year, when limiting emissions.

But the benefits are much greater, $37 billion to $90 billion annually, the EPA said. The savings stem from the prevention of up to 11,000 deaths, 4,700 nonfatal heart attacks and 540,000 lost days of work, the EPA said. Mercury accumulates in fish and is especially dangerous to pregnant or breastfeeding women, and young children, because of concern that too much could harm a developing brain.

The dispute stems from a sentence at the heart of the Clean Air Act: "The Administrator shall regulate electric utility steam generating units under this section, if the Administrator finds such regulation is appropriate and necessary after considering the results of the study required by this subparagraph."

The petitioners —which include Michigan and 20 other states as well as organizations like the National Mining Association — think the EPA misinterpreted the words "appropriate and necessary." 

In their most recent petition to the court, they state the EPA "treats the word 'appropriate' as meaningless and ignores a factor — costs — that Congress intended [the] EPA to consider." The EPA also "unreasonably fail[ed] to give 'appropriate' any meaning beyond that already ascribed to 'necessary.'"

EPA MATS map

Several conservative justices questioned whether EPA should have taken costs into account when it first decided to regulate hazardous air pollutants from power plants, or whether health risks are the only consideration under the Clean Air Act. The EPA did factor in costs at a later stage when it wrote standards that are expected to reduce the toxic emissions by 90 percent.

Justice Antonin Scalia was critical of the agency's reading of the provisions of the anti-air pollution law at issue in the case throughout 90 minutes of arguments. "It's a silly way to read them," Scalia said.

The court's four liberal justices appeared more comfortable with EPA's position, leaving Justice Anthony Kennedy as the possible decisive vote.

Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr. said EPA followed the same process in deciding whether to regulate other sources of emissions, including from motor vehicles.

The case is the latest in a string of attacks against the Obama administration's actions to rein in pollution from coal-burning power plants that harms health and contributes to global warming. The administration is seeking to use the Clean Air Act for the first time to control mercury and carbon pollution from the nation's power plants.

But numerous states have already filed challenges to a proposed rule to curb the pollution linked to global warming from the nation's coal-burning power plants. And Congress is working on a bill that would allow states to opt out of any rules clamping down on heat-trapping carbon dioxide.

The legal and political challenges ahead could undermine US efforts to inspire other countries to control their emissions, as they head into negotiations in Paris on a new international treaty later this year.

A disproportionate share of the 600 affected power plants, most of which burn coal, are in the South and upper Midwest. Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette, representing 21 states at the Supreme Court, said the law requires the EPA to take account of costs before deciding whether to step in. The states and industry groups also said the agency overstated the benefits of reducing mercury emissions.

coal plantShuttering older plants or installing pollution-control equipment also will reduce emissions of particulate matter, such as dust, dirt and other fragments associated with a variety of respiratory ailments. The administration said it properly took those benefits into account, but the challengers argued that they are not relevant to the case.

Chief Justice John Roberts called the inclusion of those other benefits an "end run" around more stringent procedures EPA would have to follow to try to reduce emissions of particulate matter.

Several utilities that already have installed the equipment or that primarily rely on natural gas and nuclear power to make electricity said the EPA rules are economically practical. Moreover, they said that until the rules take effect their competitors who haven't yet complied with the rules have an unfair advantage. Another 16 states and several large cities also are backing the administration.

Congress first ordered the EPA to study the release of mercury among 180 toxic substances in 1990. The agency initially decided to go ahead with the limits on power plant emissions in 2000, the final year of the Clinton administration.

After President George W. Bush took office in 2001, the EPA tried to undo its earlier decision, but the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington blocked that attempt. When Barack Obama became president in 2009, the agency again decided to move forward. It issued final rules in 2012, and the appeals court upheld them last year.

A decision is expected by the end of June.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Animated map of what Earth would look like if all the ice melted

The hidden ingredients in your favorite chain pizzas

$
0
0

About 1 in 8 Americans consumes pizza on any given day. 

Vani Hari, the author and blogger who goes by Food Babe, conducted an investigation to see what ingredients were in pizza from popular chain restaurants like Domino's, Pizza Hut, and Papa John's. 

Hari looked for ingredient lists online. When she couldn't find them, she followed up with the companies. 

While most of the chains complied, Little Caesars, California Pizza Kitchen (CPK), and Mellow Mushroom all refused to give Hari more details, saying that revealing ingredients could give competitors an advantage. 

Here's the chart showing additives in chain pizza. 

 pizza food babe

Hari writes her most disturbing finding was what she calls "hidden MSG."

Monosodium glutamate, or MSG, is a controversial flavor enhancer. Critics of the ingredient say it is linked to headaches, obesity, fatigue, and Alzheimer's disease. However, there's no conclusive scientific evidence that it's dangerous. 

"Instead of letting you know that they are putting MSG in your food, they are using an FDA loophole to sneak processed free glutamic acid into your food, which has the same effect as MSG – all without warning you," Hari writes. 

pizza hut

Another writer who tried to identify the "better ingredients" in Papa John's pizza says she was shut down by the company.

Melanie Warner from US News And World Report was curious about the ingredients Papa John's has advertised for so long. 

While packaged product companies have to disclose ingredients, restaurants don't, Warner writes

Still, chains like Taco Bell, McDonald's, and Subway voluntarily provide the information. 

Warner went to her local Boulder Papa John's and asked an employee for more information about the ingredients. He directed her to the company's website, but ingredients aren't listed online either. 

Finally, Warner left messages with various company representatives but says no one got back to her.  

She did gain some insight from a worker named Charlie, however, who told her that the company's "never frozen" mantra is bogus: 

"We get deliveries in every three days, so nothing that's in the fridge is more than a few days old. And we form the dough here. It doesn't come ready to go, though it is made in a central facility and then frozen," he told Warner.

SEE ALSO: How millennials' dining habits are different from their parents

Follow Us: On Facebook

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Animated map of what Earth would look like if all the ice melted


Watch a member of Congress do 'the worst parking job' ever

$
0
0

car dc

Eleanor Holmes Norton, Washington D.C.'s nonvoting member of Congress, apparently had quite the experience while parking her car on Wednesday.

Roll Call's gossip blog "Heard on the Hill"obtained footage of Norton struggling to get her car into a parking spot near some Capitol office space, widely missing the lines separating her space from the others. 

One anonymous observer claimed she hit the red car next to hers several times.  

"Unbelievable. No note or anything!" another anonymous observer says while filming the phenomenon. "And if she leaves it like that, it's the worst parking job I've ever witnessed." 

However, Norton's office told Roll Call that no damage was done and insisted she actually did leave her number behind.

"After the Congresswoman parked her car, we assessed the cars on either side to see if there was any damage. We could not find any," a Norton aide told the outlet. "But we left a note with a business card so the congresswoman could be contacted in case we missed any."

Watch below:

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 6 Crazy Things Revealed In HBO's Explosive New Scientology Documentary 'Going Clear'

Google's magic Internet balloons made a joke cameo at today's Facebook event

$
0
0

The WiFi and cell reception at today's Facebook F8 conference keynote was absolutely atrocious, given that the venue — San Francisco's Fort Mason Center — is basically a concrete bunker with nice lighting. 

So some joker took the time to name one of the WiFi networks, or perhaps a personal Mi-Fi network, after Google Loon, the search company's initiative to bring Internet access to developing countries that don't have it.

At least we assume it's a joke — as far as we saw, Google didn't have any balloons floating overhead. Plus, given all the shots Facebook took at Google today, we can't imagine the search giant is feeling particularly friendly to Facebook right now.

Google Loon SSID

Facebook has its own initiative to bring the Internet to the billions of people who don't have access today, called Internet.org. Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg has been making the rounds touting Internet.org lately, and Zuckerberg recently told an interviewer that he'd be happy to work with Google on the project.

 

RECAP: Here's everything Facebook announced today

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: We Asked Kids What They Think About Facebook, And Mark Zuckerberg Should Be Worried

There's only one 'bubble' in this chart — but the current boom will turn to bust

$
0
0

The argument continues to rage about whether the tech sector is in a "bubble."

The answer is clear:

It isn't.

"Bubbles" are rare, extreme events in which investment activity and valuations temporarily deviate wildly from historical trends — and then crash back down to the trend line in a colossal collapse.

"Booms," meanwhile, are far more common. They also see ever-increasing investment activity and valuations, and they also end in mean-reversion ("busts.") But the magnitude of the dime-a-dozen boom-bust cycle is nothing like the peak and valley that you experience in a bubble.

The chart below clearly illustrates this.

It shows private investment in tech startups year-by-year since 1990:

blodget current boom

As you can see, there is one clear and glaring anomaly over this 25-year period: The late 1990s. In hindsight, that was clearly a "bubble," though it actually wasn't so obvious at the time.

The rest of the period is composed of standard cyclicality — booms and busts. These cycles normally last about 10 years. We're about 7 years into the latest one. At some point soon (this year, next year, the following year?) we'll enter the bust.

SEE ALSO:
* BLODGET: This boom will end in a bust
* DEAR SILICON VALLEY: Here's your wake-up call...

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 14 things you didn't know your iPhone headphones could do

Two police officers who shot an unarmed man in the face won a $4 million lawsuit against the LAPD

$
0
0

Screen Shot 2015 03 25 at 11.42.21 AM

Two Los Angeles police officers who say they were given desk jobs and passed up for promotions after shooting an unarmed autistic man in the face in 2010 have successfully sued the LAPD for discrimination and retaliation, the LA Times has reported.

Officers Allan Corrales, 35, and George Diego, 34, were awarded $4 million after successfully arguing that they were discriminated against within the department because they are Latino and the man they shot, 27-year-old Steven Washington, was black.

Washington's mother received only $950,000 in a settlement from the city after filing a wrongful death lawsuit back in 2012.

The officers claimed they faced retaliation from the department simply for doing their jobs. 

Charlie Beck

LAPD Chief Charlie Beck testified that he had prohibited the officers from returning to the field because he had "no confidence in their ability to perform the duties of a field officer," not because of their race.

Corrales and Diego were on gang patrol in an unmarked police car when they came across Washington walking alone in the Koreatown neighborhood of LA a little after midnight in March 2010. After turning around and seeing the car, Washington allegedly gave the officers a "dead stare" and appeared to reach for a "dark object" in his waistband, ignoring commands to put his hands up.

The officers claim they were acting in self-defense when they opened fire. But in 2011, a civilian commission ruled that the officers were not justified in the shooting, AP reported. Washington was unarmed, and the dark object they saw was probably his black cellphone. He was also autistic, which made him fear strangers, Washington's family said.

Chief Charlie Beck has had to deal with dozens of use-of-force cases since he took over as the head of the LAPD in November 2009. The department is investigating the August 2014 shooting death of a mentally ill, unarmed black man in South L.A.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 14 things you didn't know your iPhone headphones could do

Ex-POW Bergdahl charged with desertion: US officials

$
0
0

US Army handout photo shows Private First Class Bowe Bergdahl, before his capture by the Taliban in Afghanistan

Washington (AFP) - The US soldier who was held by insurgents for five years after disappearing from his post in Afghanistan has been charged with desertion and "misbehavior before the enemy", officials said Wednesday.

Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl, 28, was released in May last year in a swap for five Taliban detainees held at the US-run prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

The only American in uniform to be held by insurgents in the Afghanistan war, Bergdahl was held in captivity at the hands of Taliban-linked Haqqani insurgents after he went missing from his post in eastern Afghanistan near the Pakistani border in June 2009.

Army authorities plan to hold a news conference to discuss the charges against the former prisoner of war. 

The desertion charge carries a potential death sentence, though legal experts say execution would be highly unlikely and a plea agreement could be reached before any trial goes ahead.

Some soldiers who served at the same eastern base have alleged that he walked out of his unit willingly, putting other troops at risk as they searched for him.

Their account has sparked outrage in some circles over the prisoner swap.

Bergdahl is being defended by a prominent lawyer and expert on military justice, Eugene Fidell, who teaches at Yale Law School.

Fidell, while declining to discuss the case in depth publicly, has said that Bergdahl was proud to wear the US uniform and has been made a scapegoat by people opposed to closing down the controversial prison camp in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

Join the conversation about this story »

Viewing all 76301 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>